Cargando…

Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication

OBJECTIVES: We expect physicians to be lifelong learners. Participation in clinical practice is an important potential source of that learning. To support physicians in this process, a better understanding of how they learn in clinical practice is necessary. This study investigates how physicians re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sehlbach, Carolin, Teunissen, Pim W., Driessen, Erik W., Mitchell, Sharon, Rohde, Gernot G. U., Smeenk, Frank W. J. M., Govaerts, Marjan J. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14148
_version_ 1783583203710205952
author Sehlbach, Carolin
Teunissen, Pim W.
Driessen, Erik W.
Mitchell, Sharon
Rohde, Gernot G. U.
Smeenk, Frank W. J. M.
Govaerts, Marjan J. B.
author_facet Sehlbach, Carolin
Teunissen, Pim W.
Driessen, Erik W.
Mitchell, Sharon
Rohde, Gernot G. U.
Smeenk, Frank W. J. M.
Govaerts, Marjan J. B.
author_sort Sehlbach, Carolin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We expect physicians to be lifelong learners. Participation in clinical practice is an important potential source of that learning. To support physicians in this process, a better understanding of how they learn in clinical practice is necessary. This study investigates how physicians recognise and use informal feedback from interactions with patients in outpatient settings as learning cues to adjust their communication behaviours in daily practice. METHODS: To understand physicians’ use of informal feedback, we combined non‐participant observations with semi‐structured interviews. We enrolled 10 respiratory physicians and observed 100 physician‐patient interactions at two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively according to the principles of constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: Following stages of open, axial and selective coding, we were able to conceptualise how physicians use cues to reflect on and adjust their communication. In addition to vast variations within and across patient encounters, we observed recurring adjustments in physicians’ communication behaviours in response to specific informal feedback cues. Physicians recognised and used these cues to self‐monitor communication performance. They had established ‘communication repertoires’ based on multiple patient interactions, which many saw as learning opportunities contributing to the development of expertise. Our findings, however, show differences in physicians’ individual levels of sensitivity in recognising and using learning opportunities in daily practice, which were further influenced by contextual, personal and interpersonal factors. Whereas some described themselves as having little inclination to change, others used critical incidents to fine‐tune their communication repertoires, and yet others constantly reshaped them, seeking learning opportunities in their daily work. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in how physicians use learning cues from daily practice. To enhance learning in and from daily practice, we propose turning workplace learning into a collaborative effort with the aim of increasing awareness and the use of informal performance‐relevant feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74969152020-09-25 Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication Sehlbach, Carolin Teunissen, Pim W. Driessen, Erik W. Mitchell, Sharon Rohde, Gernot G. U. Smeenk, Frank W. J. M. Govaerts, Marjan J. B. Med Educ Workplace Learning OBJECTIVES: We expect physicians to be lifelong learners. Participation in clinical practice is an important potential source of that learning. To support physicians in this process, a better understanding of how they learn in clinical practice is necessary. This study investigates how physicians recognise and use informal feedback from interactions with patients in outpatient settings as learning cues to adjust their communication behaviours in daily practice. METHODS: To understand physicians’ use of informal feedback, we combined non‐participant observations with semi‐structured interviews. We enrolled 10 respiratory physicians and observed 100 physician‐patient interactions at two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively according to the principles of constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: Following stages of open, axial and selective coding, we were able to conceptualise how physicians use cues to reflect on and adjust their communication. In addition to vast variations within and across patient encounters, we observed recurring adjustments in physicians’ communication behaviours in response to specific informal feedback cues. Physicians recognised and used these cues to self‐monitor communication performance. They had established ‘communication repertoires’ based on multiple patient interactions, which many saw as learning opportunities contributing to the development of expertise. Our findings, however, show differences in physicians’ individual levels of sensitivity in recognising and using learning opportunities in daily practice, which were further influenced by contextual, personal and interpersonal factors. Whereas some described themselves as having little inclination to change, others used critical incidents to fine‐tune their communication repertoires, and yet others constantly reshaped them, seeking learning opportunities in their daily work. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in how physicians use learning cues from daily practice. To enhance learning in and from daily practice, we propose turning workplace learning into a collaborative effort with the aim of increasing awareness and the use of informal performance‐relevant feedback. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-20 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7496915/ /pubmed/32150761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14148 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Workplace Learning
Sehlbach, Carolin
Teunissen, Pim W.
Driessen, Erik W.
Mitchell, Sharon
Rohde, Gernot G. U.
Smeenk, Frank W. J. M.
Govaerts, Marjan J. B.
Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
title Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
title_full Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
title_fullStr Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
title_full_unstemmed Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
title_short Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
title_sort learning in the workplace: use of informal feedback cues in doctor‐patient communication
topic Workplace Learning
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14148
work_keys_str_mv AT sehlbachcarolin learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication
AT teunissenpimw learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication
AT driessenerikw learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication
AT mitchellsharon learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication
AT rohdegernotgu learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication
AT smeenkfrankwjm learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication
AT govaertsmarjanjb learningintheworkplaceuseofinformalfeedbackcuesindoctorpatientcommunication