Cargando…
The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the gut microbiome and fibre fermentation capacity. METHODS: Faecal samples from 13 healthy volunteers were fermented in batch cultures with food additives (maltodextrin, carboxymeth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8 |
_version_ | 1783583987640303616 |
---|---|
author | Gerasimidis, Konstantinos Bryden, Katie Chen, Xiufen Papachristou, Eleftheria Verney, Anais Roig, Marine Hansen, Richard Nichols, Ben Papadopoulou, Rodanthi Parrett, Alison |
author_facet | Gerasimidis, Konstantinos Bryden, Katie Chen, Xiufen Papachristou, Eleftheria Verney, Anais Roig, Marine Hansen, Richard Nichols, Ben Papadopoulou, Rodanthi Parrett, Alison |
author_sort | Gerasimidis, Konstantinos |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the gut microbiome and fibre fermentation capacity. METHODS: Faecal samples from 13 healthy volunteers were fermented in batch cultures with food additives (maltodextrin, carboxymethyl cellulose, polysorbate-80, carrageenan-kappa, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate, sodium sulphite, titanium dioxide), sweeteners (aspartame-based sweetener, sucralose, stevia) and domestic hygiene products (toothpaste and dishwashing detergent). Short-chain fatty acid production was measured with gas chromatography. Microbiome composition was characterised with 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: Acetic acid increased in the presence of maltodextrin and the aspartame-based sweetener and decreased with dishwashing detergent or sodium sulphite. Propionic acid increased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 and butyrate decreased dramatically with cinnamaldehyde and dishwashing detergent. Branched-chain fatty acids decreased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate and dishwashing detergent. Microbiome Shannon α-diversity increased with stevia and decreased with dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde. Sucralose, cinnamaldehyde, titanium dioxide, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent shifted microbiome community structure; the effects were most profound with dishwashing detergent (R(2) = 43.9%, p = 0.008) followed by cinnamaldehyde (R(2) = 12.8%, p = 0.016). Addition of dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde increased the abundance of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) belonging to Escherichia/Shigella and Klebsiella and decreased members of Firmicutes, including OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Addition of sucralose and carrageenan-kappa also increased the abundance of Escherichia/Shigella and sucralose, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 did likewise to Bilophila. Polysorbate-80 decreased the abundance of OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Similar effects were observed with the concentration of major bacterial groups using qPCR. In addition, maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener and sodium benzoate promoted the growth of Bifidobacterium whereas sodium sulphite, carrageenan-kappa, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent had an inhibitory effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study improves understanding of how additives might affect the gut microbiota composition and its fibre metabolic activity with many possible implications for human health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7501109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75011092020-10-01 The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity Gerasimidis, Konstantinos Bryden, Katie Chen, Xiufen Papachristou, Eleftheria Verney, Anais Roig, Marine Hansen, Richard Nichols, Ben Papadopoulou, Rodanthi Parrett, Alison Eur J Nutr Original Contribution PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the gut microbiome and fibre fermentation capacity. METHODS: Faecal samples from 13 healthy volunteers were fermented in batch cultures with food additives (maltodextrin, carboxymethyl cellulose, polysorbate-80, carrageenan-kappa, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate, sodium sulphite, titanium dioxide), sweeteners (aspartame-based sweetener, sucralose, stevia) and domestic hygiene products (toothpaste and dishwashing detergent). Short-chain fatty acid production was measured with gas chromatography. Microbiome composition was characterised with 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: Acetic acid increased in the presence of maltodextrin and the aspartame-based sweetener and decreased with dishwashing detergent or sodium sulphite. Propionic acid increased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 and butyrate decreased dramatically with cinnamaldehyde and dishwashing detergent. Branched-chain fatty acids decreased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate and dishwashing detergent. Microbiome Shannon α-diversity increased with stevia and decreased with dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde. Sucralose, cinnamaldehyde, titanium dioxide, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent shifted microbiome community structure; the effects were most profound with dishwashing detergent (R(2) = 43.9%, p = 0.008) followed by cinnamaldehyde (R(2) = 12.8%, p = 0.016). Addition of dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde increased the abundance of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) belonging to Escherichia/Shigella and Klebsiella and decreased members of Firmicutes, including OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Addition of sucralose and carrageenan-kappa also increased the abundance of Escherichia/Shigella and sucralose, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 did likewise to Bilophila. Polysorbate-80 decreased the abundance of OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Similar effects were observed with the concentration of major bacterial groups using qPCR. In addition, maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener and sodium benzoate promoted the growth of Bifidobacterium whereas sodium sulphite, carrageenan-kappa, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent had an inhibitory effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study improves understanding of how additives might affect the gut microbiota composition and its fibre metabolic activity with many possible implications for human health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7501109/ /pubmed/31853641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Gerasimidis, Konstantinos Bryden, Katie Chen, Xiufen Papachristou, Eleftheria Verney, Anais Roig, Marine Hansen, Richard Nichols, Ben Papadopoulou, Rodanthi Parrett, Alison The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
title | The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
title_full | The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
title_fullStr | The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
title_short | The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
title_sort | impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerasimidiskonstantinos theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT brydenkatie theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT chenxiufen theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT papachristoueleftheria theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT verneyanais theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT roigmarine theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT hansenrichard theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT nicholsben theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT papadopoulourodanthi theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT parrettalison theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT gerasimidiskonstantinos impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT brydenkatie impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT chenxiufen impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT papachristoueleftheria impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT verneyanais impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT roigmarine impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT hansenrichard impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT nicholsben impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT papadopoulourodanthi impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity AT parrettalison impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity |