Cargando…

The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the gut microbiome and fibre fermentation capacity. METHODS: Faecal samples from 13 healthy volunteers were fermented in batch cultures with food additives (maltodextrin, carboxymeth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerasimidis, Konstantinos, Bryden, Katie, Chen, Xiufen, Papachristou, Eleftheria, Verney, Anais, Roig, Marine, Hansen, Richard, Nichols, Ben, Papadopoulou, Rodanthi, Parrett, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8
_version_ 1783583987640303616
author Gerasimidis, Konstantinos
Bryden, Katie
Chen, Xiufen
Papachristou, Eleftheria
Verney, Anais
Roig, Marine
Hansen, Richard
Nichols, Ben
Papadopoulou, Rodanthi
Parrett, Alison
author_facet Gerasimidis, Konstantinos
Bryden, Katie
Chen, Xiufen
Papachristou, Eleftheria
Verney, Anais
Roig, Marine
Hansen, Richard
Nichols, Ben
Papadopoulou, Rodanthi
Parrett, Alison
author_sort Gerasimidis, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the gut microbiome and fibre fermentation capacity. METHODS: Faecal samples from 13 healthy volunteers were fermented in batch cultures with food additives (maltodextrin, carboxymethyl cellulose, polysorbate-80, carrageenan-kappa, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate, sodium sulphite, titanium dioxide), sweeteners (aspartame-based sweetener, sucralose, stevia) and domestic hygiene products (toothpaste and dishwashing detergent). Short-chain fatty acid production was measured with gas chromatography. Microbiome composition was characterised with 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: Acetic acid increased in the presence of maltodextrin and the aspartame-based sweetener and decreased with dishwashing detergent or sodium sulphite. Propionic acid increased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 and butyrate decreased dramatically with cinnamaldehyde and dishwashing detergent. Branched-chain fatty acids decreased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate and dishwashing detergent. Microbiome Shannon α-diversity increased with stevia and decreased with dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde. Sucralose, cinnamaldehyde, titanium dioxide, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent shifted microbiome community structure; the effects were most profound with dishwashing detergent (R(2) = 43.9%, p = 0.008) followed by cinnamaldehyde (R(2) = 12.8%, p = 0.016). Addition of dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde increased the abundance of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) belonging to Escherichia/Shigella and Klebsiella and decreased members of Firmicutes, including OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Addition of sucralose and carrageenan-kappa also increased the abundance of Escherichia/Shigella and sucralose, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 did likewise to Bilophila. Polysorbate-80 decreased the abundance of OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Similar effects were observed with the concentration of major bacterial groups using qPCR. In addition, maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener and sodium benzoate promoted the growth of Bifidobacterium whereas sodium sulphite, carrageenan-kappa, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent had an inhibitory effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study improves understanding of how additives might affect the gut microbiota composition and its fibre metabolic activity with many possible implications for human health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7501109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75011092020-10-01 The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity Gerasimidis, Konstantinos Bryden, Katie Chen, Xiufen Papachristou, Eleftheria Verney, Anais Roig, Marine Hansen, Richard Nichols, Ben Papadopoulou, Rodanthi Parrett, Alison Eur J Nutr Original Contribution PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the gut microbiome and fibre fermentation capacity. METHODS: Faecal samples from 13 healthy volunteers were fermented in batch cultures with food additives (maltodextrin, carboxymethyl cellulose, polysorbate-80, carrageenan-kappa, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate, sodium sulphite, titanium dioxide), sweeteners (aspartame-based sweetener, sucralose, stevia) and domestic hygiene products (toothpaste and dishwashing detergent). Short-chain fatty acid production was measured with gas chromatography. Microbiome composition was characterised with 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: Acetic acid increased in the presence of maltodextrin and the aspartame-based sweetener and decreased with dishwashing detergent or sodium sulphite. Propionic acid increased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 and butyrate decreased dramatically with cinnamaldehyde and dishwashing detergent. Branched-chain fatty acids decreased with maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener, cinnamaldehyde, sodium benzoate and dishwashing detergent. Microbiome Shannon α-diversity increased with stevia and decreased with dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde. Sucralose, cinnamaldehyde, titanium dioxide, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent shifted microbiome community structure; the effects were most profound with dishwashing detergent (R(2) = 43.9%, p = 0.008) followed by cinnamaldehyde (R(2) = 12.8%, p = 0.016). Addition of dishwashing detergent and cinnamaldehyde increased the abundance of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) belonging to Escherichia/Shigella and Klebsiella and decreased members of Firmicutes, including OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Addition of sucralose and carrageenan-kappa also increased the abundance of Escherichia/Shigella and sucralose, sodium sulphite and polysorbate-80 did likewise to Bilophila. Polysorbate-80 decreased the abundance of OTUs of Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum. Similar effects were observed with the concentration of major bacterial groups using qPCR. In addition, maltodextrin, aspartame-based sweetener and sodium benzoate promoted the growth of Bifidobacterium whereas sodium sulphite, carrageenan-kappa, polysorbate-80 and dishwashing detergent had an inhibitory effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study improves understanding of how additives might affect the gut microbiota composition and its fibre metabolic activity with many possible implications for human health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7501109/ /pubmed/31853641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Gerasimidis, Konstantinos
Bryden, Katie
Chen, Xiufen
Papachristou, Eleftheria
Verney, Anais
Roig, Marine
Hansen, Richard
Nichols, Ben
Papadopoulou, Rodanthi
Parrett, Alison
The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
title The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
title_full The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
title_fullStr The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
title_full_unstemmed The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
title_short The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
title_sort impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02161-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gerasimidiskonstantinos theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT brydenkatie theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT chenxiufen theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT papachristoueleftheria theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT verneyanais theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT roigmarine theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT hansenrichard theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT nicholsben theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT papadopoulourodanthi theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT parrettalison theimpactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT gerasimidiskonstantinos impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT brydenkatie impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT chenxiufen impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT papachristoueleftheria impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT verneyanais impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT roigmarine impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT hansenrichard impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT nicholsben impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT papadopoulourodanthi impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity
AT parrettalison impactoffoodadditivesartificialsweetenersanddomestichygieneproductsonthehumangutmicrobiomeanditsfibrefermentationcapacity