Cargando…
The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients leaving the emergency department (ED) have poor recall and understanding of their discharge information. The teach-back method is an easy technique that can be used to check, and if necessary correct, inaccurate recall. In our study, we ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-00306-9 |
_version_ | 1783586349521043456 |
---|---|
author | Mahajan, Mandhkani Hogewoning, Janine Alida Zewald, Jeroen Joseph Antonius Kerkmeer, Margreet Feitsma, Mathilde van Rijssel, Daphne Annika |
author_facet | Mahajan, Mandhkani Hogewoning, Janine Alida Zewald, Jeroen Joseph Antonius Kerkmeer, Margreet Feitsma, Mathilde van Rijssel, Daphne Annika |
author_sort | Mahajan, Mandhkani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients leaving the emergency department (ED) have poor recall and understanding of their discharge information. The teach-back method is an easy technique that can be used to check, and if necessary correct, inaccurate recall. In our study, we aimed to determine the direct and short-term impact of teach-back as well as feasibility for routine use in the ED. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in an urban, non-academic ED was performed which included adult patients who were discharged from the ED with a new medical problem. The control group with the standard discharge was compared to the intervention group using the teach-back method. Recall and comprehension scores were assessed immediately after discharge and 2–4 days afterward by phone, using four standardized questions concerning their diagnosis, treatment, follow-up care, and return precautions. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study, 239 in the control group, and 244 in the intervention group. Patients receiving teach-back had higher scores on all domains immediately after discharge and on three domains after 2–4 days (6.3% versus 4.5%). After teach-back, the proportion of patients that left the ED with a comprehension deficit declined from 49 to 11.9%. Deficits were most common for return precautions in both groups (41.3% versus 8.1%). Teach-back conversation took 1:39 min, versus an average of 3:11 min for a regular discharge interview. CONCLUSION: Teach-back is an efficient and non-time-consuming method to improve patients’ immediate and short-term recall and comprehension of discharge information in the ED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7513274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75132742020-09-25 The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study Mahajan, Mandhkani Hogewoning, Janine Alida Zewald, Jeroen Joseph Antonius Kerkmeer, Margreet Feitsma, Mathilde van Rijssel, Daphne Annika Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients leaving the emergency department (ED) have poor recall and understanding of their discharge information. The teach-back method is an easy technique that can be used to check, and if necessary correct, inaccurate recall. In our study, we aimed to determine the direct and short-term impact of teach-back as well as feasibility for routine use in the ED. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in an urban, non-academic ED was performed which included adult patients who were discharged from the ED with a new medical problem. The control group with the standard discharge was compared to the intervention group using the teach-back method. Recall and comprehension scores were assessed immediately after discharge and 2–4 days afterward by phone, using four standardized questions concerning their diagnosis, treatment, follow-up care, and return precautions. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study, 239 in the control group, and 244 in the intervention group. Patients receiving teach-back had higher scores on all domains immediately after discharge and on three domains after 2–4 days (6.3% versus 4.5%). After teach-back, the proportion of patients that left the ED with a comprehension deficit declined from 49 to 11.9%. Deficits were most common for return precautions in both groups (41.3% versus 8.1%). Teach-back conversation took 1:39 min, versus an average of 3:11 min for a regular discharge interview. CONCLUSION: Teach-back is an efficient and non-time-consuming method to improve patients’ immediate and short-term recall and comprehension of discharge information in the ED. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7513274/ /pubmed/32972361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-00306-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mahajan, Mandhkani Hogewoning, Janine Alida Zewald, Jeroen Joseph Antonius Kerkmeer, Margreet Feitsma, Mathilde van Rijssel, Daphne Annika The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study |
title | The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study |
title_full | The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study |
title_fullStr | The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study |
title_short | The impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the Emergency Teach-Back (EM-TeBa) study |
title_sort | impact of teach-back on patient recall and understanding of discharge information in the emergency department: the emergency teach-back (em-teba) study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7513274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-00306-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahajanmandhkani theimpactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT hogewoningjaninealida theimpactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT zewaldjeroenjosephantonius theimpactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT kerkmeermargreet theimpactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT feitsmamathilde theimpactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT vanrijsseldaphneannika theimpactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT mahajanmandhkani impactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT hogewoningjaninealida impactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT zewaldjeroenjosephantonius impactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT kerkmeermargreet impactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT feitsmamathilde impactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy AT vanrijsseldaphneannika impactofteachbackonpatientrecallandunderstandingofdischargeinformationintheemergencydepartmenttheemergencyteachbackemtebastudy |