Cargando…

A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design

BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a key feature of many medical education systems, helping to ensure that programs teach and assess learners according to applicable standards, provide optimal learning environments, and produce professionals who are competent to practise in challenging and evolving health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taber, Sarah, Akdemir, Nesibe, Gorman, Lisa, van Zanten, Marta, Frank, Jason R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32981517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02122-4
_version_ 1783587877914935296
author Taber, Sarah
Akdemir, Nesibe
Gorman, Lisa
van Zanten, Marta
Frank, Jason R.
author_facet Taber, Sarah
Akdemir, Nesibe
Gorman, Lisa
van Zanten, Marta
Frank, Jason R.
author_sort Taber, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a key feature of many medical education systems, helping to ensure that programs teach and assess learners according to applicable standards, provide optimal learning environments, and produce professionals who are competent to practise in challenging and evolving health care systems. Although most medical education accreditation systems apply similar standards domains and process elements, there can be substantial variation among accreditation systems at the level of design and implementation. A discussion group at the 2013 World Summit on Outcomes-Based Accreditation examined best practices in health professional education accreditation systems and identified that the literature examining the effectiveness of different approaches to accreditation is scant. Although some frameworks for accreditation design do exist, they are often specific to one phase of the medical education continuum. MAIN TEXT: This paper attempts to define a framework for the operational design of medical education accreditation that articulates design options as well as their contextual and practical implications. It assumes there is no single set of best practices in accreditation system development but, rather, an underlying set of design decisions. A “fit for purpose” approach aims to ensure that a system, policy, or program is designed and operationalized in a manner best suited to local needs and contexts. This approach is aligned with emerging models for education and international development that espouse decentralization. CONCLUSION: The framework highlights that, rather than a single best practice, variation among accreditation systems is appropriate provided that is it tailored to the needs of local contexts. Our framework is intended to provide guidance to administrators, policy-makers, and educators regarding different approaches to medical education accreditation and their applicability and appropriateness in local contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7520946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75209462020-09-30 A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design Taber, Sarah Akdemir, Nesibe Gorman, Lisa van Zanten, Marta Frank, Jason R. BMC Med Educ Review BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a key feature of many medical education systems, helping to ensure that programs teach and assess learners according to applicable standards, provide optimal learning environments, and produce professionals who are competent to practise in challenging and evolving health care systems. Although most medical education accreditation systems apply similar standards domains and process elements, there can be substantial variation among accreditation systems at the level of design and implementation. A discussion group at the 2013 World Summit on Outcomes-Based Accreditation examined best practices in health professional education accreditation systems and identified that the literature examining the effectiveness of different approaches to accreditation is scant. Although some frameworks for accreditation design do exist, they are often specific to one phase of the medical education continuum. MAIN TEXT: This paper attempts to define a framework for the operational design of medical education accreditation that articulates design options as well as their contextual and practical implications. It assumes there is no single set of best practices in accreditation system development but, rather, an underlying set of design decisions. A “fit for purpose” approach aims to ensure that a system, policy, or program is designed and operationalized in a manner best suited to local needs and contexts. This approach is aligned with emerging models for education and international development that espouse decentralization. CONCLUSION: The framework highlights that, rather than a single best practice, variation among accreditation systems is appropriate provided that is it tailored to the needs of local contexts. Our framework is intended to provide guidance to administrators, policy-makers, and educators regarding different approaches to medical education accreditation and their applicability and appropriateness in local contexts. BioMed Central 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7520946/ /pubmed/32981517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02122-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Taber, Sarah
Akdemir, Nesibe
Gorman, Lisa
van Zanten, Marta
Frank, Jason R.
A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
title A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
title_full A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
title_fullStr A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
title_full_unstemmed A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
title_short A “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
title_sort “fit for purpose” framework for medical education accreditation system design
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7520946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32981517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02122-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tabersarah afitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT akdemirnesibe afitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT gormanlisa afitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT vanzantenmarta afitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT frankjasonr afitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT tabersarah fitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT akdemirnesibe fitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT gormanlisa fitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT vanzantenmarta fitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign
AT frankjasonr fitforpurposeframeworkformedicaleducationaccreditationsystemdesign