Cargando…

An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics

Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhongqi, Chan, Pik K., Richardson, Jason, Shah, Bhavana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062
_version_ 1783589781313159168
author Zhang, Zhongqi
Chan, Pik K.
Richardson, Jason
Shah, Bhavana
author_facet Zhang, Zhongqi
Chan, Pik K.
Richardson, Jason
Shah, Bhavana
author_sort Zhang, Zhongqi
collection PubMed
description Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM developed so far have been based on high-resolution mass spectrometers, due to their superb resolving power to distinguish analyte signals from interferences. Lower-resolution instruments, if demonstrated suitable, may further promote the adoption of the technology due to their low cost, small footprint, and ease of use. In this work, we compared the performance of a high-resolution instrument with a few low-resolution quadrupole-type instruments in quantifying a diverse set of quality attributes in a monoclonal antibody product. Different modes of operation for the quadrupole instruments, including scan mode, selected-ion monitoring and multiple-reaction monitoring, were evaluated. The high-resolution instrument has superb performance, with a quantitation limit of 0.002%. Single-quadrupole instruments in scan mode, on the other hand, provide a quantitation limit of about 1%, which may be fit-for-purpose for many routine MAM applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7531562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75315622020-10-13 An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics Zhang, Zhongqi Chan, Pik K. Richardson, Jason Shah, Bhavana MAbs Report Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM developed so far have been based on high-resolution mass spectrometers, due to their superb resolving power to distinguish analyte signals from interferences. Lower-resolution instruments, if demonstrated suitable, may further promote the adoption of the technology due to their low cost, small footprint, and ease of use. In this work, we compared the performance of a high-resolution instrument with a few low-resolution quadrupole-type instruments in quantifying a diverse set of quality attributes in a monoclonal antibody product. Different modes of operation for the quadrupole instruments, including scan mode, selected-ion monitoring and multiple-reaction monitoring, were evaluated. The high-resolution instrument has superb performance, with a quantitation limit of 0.002%. Single-quadrupole instruments in scan mode, on the other hand, provide a quantitation limit of about 1%, which may be fit-for-purpose for many routine MAM applications. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7531562/ /pubmed/32643531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062 Text en © 2020 Amgen Inc. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Report
Zhang, Zhongqi
Chan, Pik K.
Richardson, Jason
Shah, Bhavana
An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
title An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
title_full An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
title_fullStr An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
title_short An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
title_sort evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhongqi anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT chanpikk anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT richardsonjason anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT shahbhavana anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT zhangzhongqi evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT chanpikk evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT richardsonjason evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics
AT shahbhavana evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics