Cargando…
An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics
Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062 |
_version_ | 1783589781313159168 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zhongqi Chan, Pik K. Richardson, Jason Shah, Bhavana |
author_facet | Zhang, Zhongqi Chan, Pik K. Richardson, Jason Shah, Bhavana |
author_sort | Zhang, Zhongqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM developed so far have been based on high-resolution mass spectrometers, due to their superb resolving power to distinguish analyte signals from interferences. Lower-resolution instruments, if demonstrated suitable, may further promote the adoption of the technology due to their low cost, small footprint, and ease of use. In this work, we compared the performance of a high-resolution instrument with a few low-resolution quadrupole-type instruments in quantifying a diverse set of quality attributes in a monoclonal antibody product. Different modes of operation for the quadrupole instruments, including scan mode, selected-ion monitoring and multiple-reaction monitoring, were evaluated. The high-resolution instrument has superb performance, with a quantitation limit of 0.002%. Single-quadrupole instruments in scan mode, on the other hand, provide a quantitation limit of about 1%, which may be fit-for-purpose for many routine MAM applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7531562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75315622020-10-13 An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics Zhang, Zhongqi Chan, Pik K. Richardson, Jason Shah, Bhavana MAbs Report Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM developed so far have been based on high-resolution mass spectrometers, due to their superb resolving power to distinguish analyte signals from interferences. Lower-resolution instruments, if demonstrated suitable, may further promote the adoption of the technology due to their low cost, small footprint, and ease of use. In this work, we compared the performance of a high-resolution instrument with a few low-resolution quadrupole-type instruments in quantifying a diverse set of quality attributes in a monoclonal antibody product. Different modes of operation for the quadrupole instruments, including scan mode, selected-ion monitoring and multiple-reaction monitoring, were evaluated. The high-resolution instrument has superb performance, with a quantitation limit of 0.002%. Single-quadrupole instruments in scan mode, on the other hand, provide a quantitation limit of about 1%, which may be fit-for-purpose for many routine MAM applications. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7531562/ /pubmed/32643531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062 Text en © 2020 Amgen Inc. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Report Zhang, Zhongqi Chan, Pik K. Richardson, Jason Shah, Bhavana An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
title | An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
title_full | An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
title_short | An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
title_sort | evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzhongqi anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT chanpikk anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT richardsonjason anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT shahbhavana anevaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT zhangzhongqi evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT chanpikk evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT richardsonjason evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics AT shahbhavana evaluationofinstrumenttypesformassspectrometrybasedmultiattributeanalysisofbiotherapeutics |