Cargando…

Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Sedentary time poses a risk to health. Substituting physical activity for inactivity is obvious but this requires a behavior change. Interventions advocated to decrease uninterrupted physical inactivity (defined as Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METS) less than 1.5) are important. One suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sackner, Marvin A., Lopez, Jose R., Banderas, Veronica, Adams, Jose A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00278-3
_version_ 1783589886757961728
author Sackner, Marvin A.
Lopez, Jose R.
Banderas, Veronica
Adams, Jose A.
author_facet Sackner, Marvin A.
Lopez, Jose R.
Banderas, Veronica
Adams, Jose A.
author_sort Sackner, Marvin A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sedentary time poses a risk to health. Substituting physical activity for inactivity is obvious but this requires a behavior change. Interventions advocated to decrease uninterrupted physical inactivity (defined as Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METS) less than 1.5) are important. One such intervention is accomplished with the Gentle Jogger (GJ), a low risk motorized wellness device which produces effortless, rapid motion of the lower extremities simulating locomotion or fidgeting. GJ produces health benefits in type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and high blood pressure. The purpose of this trial was to ascertain whether GJ increases METS above 1.5 to explain its effectiveness despite sedentary behavior or whether tapping is responsible. METHODS: A randomized single-arm trial was conducted. Subjects were randomized to begin the study in either the supine or seated postures and on the same day crossed over with the starting posture reversed. Oxygen consumption was measured at rest and during GJ. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects were studied (15 women and 11 men) with a mean age of 44 ± 15 years and BMI 27.9 ± 5.0, 19 were overweight or obese, and 7 had normal BMI. GJ increased oxygen consumption and METS 15% in the seated posture and 13% in the supine posture. No individual receiving GJ achieved METS exceeding 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: In a moderately obese population, GJ in seated or supine posture did not exceed 1.5 METS. The values are comparable to those reported for sit-stand interventions and cannot explain the health benefits of GJ. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03602365. Registered on July 26, 2018
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7532252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75322522020-10-19 Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial Sackner, Marvin A. Lopez, Jose R. Banderas, Veronica Adams, Jose A. Sports Med Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Sedentary time poses a risk to health. Substituting physical activity for inactivity is obvious but this requires a behavior change. Interventions advocated to decrease uninterrupted physical inactivity (defined as Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METS) less than 1.5) are important. One such intervention is accomplished with the Gentle Jogger (GJ), a low risk motorized wellness device which produces effortless, rapid motion of the lower extremities simulating locomotion or fidgeting. GJ produces health benefits in type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and high blood pressure. The purpose of this trial was to ascertain whether GJ increases METS above 1.5 to explain its effectiveness despite sedentary behavior or whether tapping is responsible. METHODS: A randomized single-arm trial was conducted. Subjects were randomized to begin the study in either the supine or seated postures and on the same day crossed over with the starting posture reversed. Oxygen consumption was measured at rest and during GJ. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects were studied (15 women and 11 men) with a mean age of 44 ± 15 years and BMI 27.9 ± 5.0, 19 were overweight or obese, and 7 had normal BMI. GJ increased oxygen consumption and METS 15% in the seated posture and 13% in the supine posture. No individual receiving GJ achieved METS exceeding 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: In a moderately obese population, GJ in seated or supine posture did not exceed 1.5 METS. The values are comparable to those reported for sit-stand interventions and cannot explain the health benefits of GJ. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03602365. Registered on July 26, 2018 Springer International Publishing 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7532252/ /pubmed/33006749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00278-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sackner, Marvin A.
Lopez, Jose R.
Banderas, Veronica
Adams, Jose A.
Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial
title Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial
title_full Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial
title_short Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial
title_sort can physical activity while sedentary produce health benefits? a single-arm randomized trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00278-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sacknermarvina canphysicalactivitywhilesedentaryproducehealthbenefitsasinglearmrandomizedtrial
AT lopezjoser canphysicalactivitywhilesedentaryproducehealthbenefitsasinglearmrandomizedtrial
AT banderasveronica canphysicalactivitywhilesedentaryproducehealthbenefitsasinglearmrandomizedtrial
AT adamsjosea canphysicalactivitywhilesedentaryproducehealthbenefitsasinglearmrandomizedtrial