Cargando…

Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters

BACKGROUND: Identity provides a useful conceptual lens for understanding educational inequalities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). In this paper, we examine how paying attention to physical and digital ‘materiality’ enriches our understanding of identity work, by going bey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godec, Spela, Patel, Uma, Archer, Louise, Dawson, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w
_version_ 1783590504253882368
author Godec, Spela
Patel, Uma
Archer, Louise
Dawson, Emily
author_facet Godec, Spela
Patel, Uma
Archer, Louise
Dawson, Emily
author_sort Godec, Spela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identity provides a useful conceptual lens for understanding educational inequalities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). In this paper, we examine how paying attention to physical and digital ‘materiality’ enriches our understanding of identity work, by going beyond the spoken, written and embodied dimensions of identity performances that currently dominate the area of STEM identity scholarship. We draw on a multimodal ethnographic study with 36 young people aged 11–14 carried out over the course of one year at four UK-based informal STEM learning settings. Data collection included a series of interviews, observations and youth-created portfolios focused on STEM experiences. Illustrative case studies of two young men who took part in a community-based digital arts centre are discussed in detail through the theoretical lenses of Judith Butler’s identity performativity and Karen Barad’s intra-action. RESULTS: We argue that physical and digital materiality mattered for the performances of ‘tech identity’ in that (i) the focus on the material changed our understanding of tech identity performances; (ii) digital spaces supported identity performances alongside, with and beyond physical bodies, and drew attention to new forms of identity recognition; (iii) identity performances across spaces were unpredictable and contained by the limits of material possibilities; and (iv) particular identity performances associated with technology were aligned with dominant enactments of masculinity and might thus be less accessible to some young people. CONCLUSION: We conclude the paper by suggesting that accounting for materiality in STEM identity research not only guides researchers in going beyond what participants say and are observed doing (and thus engendering richer insights), but also offers more equitable ways of enacting research. Further, we argue that more needs to be done to support the translation of identity resources across spaces, such as between experiences within informal and online spaces, on the one hand, and formal education, on the other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7536158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75361582020-10-19 Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters Godec, Spela Patel, Uma Archer, Louise Dawson, Emily Int J STEM Educ Research BACKGROUND: Identity provides a useful conceptual lens for understanding educational inequalities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). In this paper, we examine how paying attention to physical and digital ‘materiality’ enriches our understanding of identity work, by going beyond the spoken, written and embodied dimensions of identity performances that currently dominate the area of STEM identity scholarship. We draw on a multimodal ethnographic study with 36 young people aged 11–14 carried out over the course of one year at four UK-based informal STEM learning settings. Data collection included a series of interviews, observations and youth-created portfolios focused on STEM experiences. Illustrative case studies of two young men who took part in a community-based digital arts centre are discussed in detail through the theoretical lenses of Judith Butler’s identity performativity and Karen Barad’s intra-action. RESULTS: We argue that physical and digital materiality mattered for the performances of ‘tech identity’ in that (i) the focus on the material changed our understanding of tech identity performances; (ii) digital spaces supported identity performances alongside, with and beyond physical bodies, and drew attention to new forms of identity recognition; (iii) identity performances across spaces were unpredictable and contained by the limits of material possibilities; and (iv) particular identity performances associated with technology were aligned with dominant enactments of masculinity and might thus be less accessible to some young people. CONCLUSION: We conclude the paper by suggesting that accounting for materiality in STEM identity research not only guides researchers in going beyond what participants say and are observed doing (and thus engendering richer insights), but also offers more equitable ways of enacting research. Further, we argue that more needs to be done to support the translation of identity resources across spaces, such as between experiences within informal and online spaces, on the one hand, and formal education, on the other. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7536158/ /pubmed/33088672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Godec, Spela
Patel, Uma
Archer, Louise
Dawson, Emily
Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
title Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
title_full Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
title_fullStr Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
title_full_unstemmed Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
title_short Young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
title_sort young people’s tech identity performances: why materiality matters
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w
work_keys_str_mv AT godecspela youngpeoplestechidentityperformanceswhymaterialitymatters
AT pateluma youngpeoplestechidentityperformanceswhymaterialitymatters
AT archerlouise youngpeoplestechidentityperformanceswhymaterialitymatters
AT dawsonemily youngpeoplestechidentityperformanceswhymaterialitymatters