Cargando…
Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels that generate transient currents by binding agonists and switching rapidly between closed- and open-channel conformations. Upon sustained exposure to ACh, the cell response diminishes slowly because of desensitization, a process...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rockefeller University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202012639 |
_version_ | 1783590656356122624 |
---|---|
author | Auerbach, Anthony |
author_facet | Auerbach, Anthony |
author_sort | Auerbach, Anthony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels that generate transient currents by binding agonists and switching rapidly between closed- and open-channel conformations. Upon sustained exposure to ACh, the cell response diminishes slowly because of desensitization, a process that shuts the channel even with agonists still bound. In liganded receptors, the main desensitization pathway is from the open-channel conformation, but after agonists dissociate the main recovery pathway is to the closed-channel conformation. In this Viewpoint, I discuss two mechanisms that can explain the selection of different pathways, a question that has puzzled the community for 60 yr. The first is based on a discrete-state model (the “prism”), in which closed, open, and desensitized conformational states interconnect directly. This model predicts that 5% of unliganded AChRs are desensitized. Different pathways are taken with versus without agonists because ligands have different energy properties (φ values) at the transition states of the desensitization and recovery reactions. The second is a potential energy surface model (the “monkey saddle”), in which the states connect indirectly at a shared transition state region. Different pathways are taken because agonists shift the position of the gating transition state relative to the point where gating and desensitization conformational trajectories intersect. Understanding desensitization pathways appears to be a problem of kinetics rather than of thermodynamics. Other aspects of the two mechanisms are considered, as are experiments that may someday distinguish them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7537344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75373442021-04-05 Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization Auerbach, Anthony J Gen Physiol Viewpoint Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels that generate transient currents by binding agonists and switching rapidly between closed- and open-channel conformations. Upon sustained exposure to ACh, the cell response diminishes slowly because of desensitization, a process that shuts the channel even with agonists still bound. In liganded receptors, the main desensitization pathway is from the open-channel conformation, but after agonists dissociate the main recovery pathway is to the closed-channel conformation. In this Viewpoint, I discuss two mechanisms that can explain the selection of different pathways, a question that has puzzled the community for 60 yr. The first is based on a discrete-state model (the “prism”), in which closed, open, and desensitized conformational states interconnect directly. This model predicts that 5% of unliganded AChRs are desensitized. Different pathways are taken with versus without agonists because ligands have different energy properties (φ values) at the transition states of the desensitization and recovery reactions. The second is a potential energy surface model (the “monkey saddle”), in which the states connect indirectly at a shared transition state region. Different pathways are taken because agonists shift the position of the gating transition state relative to the point where gating and desensitization conformational trajectories intersect. Understanding desensitization pathways appears to be a problem of kinetics rather than of thermodynamics. Other aspects of the two mechanisms are considered, as are experiments that may someday distinguish them. Rockefeller University Press 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7537344/ /pubmed/32910188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202012639 Text en © 2020 Auerbach http://www.rupress.org/terms/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Auerbach, Anthony Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
title | Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
title_full | Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
title_fullStr | Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
title_full_unstemmed | Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
title_short | Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
title_sort | pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202012639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT auerbachanthony pathwaysfornicotinicreceptordesensitization |