Cargando…

Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing

[Image: see text] Immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation is a key post-translational modification in regulating IgG function. It is therefore a prominent target for biomarker discovery and a critical quality attribute of antibody-based biopharmaceuticals. A common approach for IgG glycosylation analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amez-Martín, Manuela, Wuhrer, Manfred, Falck, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00656
_version_ 1783591029499232256
author Amez-Martín, Manuela
Wuhrer, Manfred
Falck, David
author_facet Amez-Martín, Manuela
Wuhrer, Manfred
Falck, David
author_sort Amez-Martín, Manuela
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation is a key post-translational modification in regulating IgG function. It is therefore a prominent target for biomarker discovery and a critical quality attribute of antibody-based biopharmaceuticals. A common approach for IgG glycosylation analysis is the measurement of tryptic glycopeptides. Glycosylation stability during sample processing is a key prerequisite for an accurate and robust analysis yet has hitherto hardly been studied. Especially, acid hydrolysis of sialic acids may be a source for instability. Therefore, we investigated acid denaturation, centrifugal vacuum concentration, and glycopeptide storage regarding changes in the IgG glycosylation profile. Intravenous IgG was analyzed employing imaginable deviations from a reference method and stress conditions. All glycosylation features —sialylation, galactosylation, bisection, and fucosylation—remained unchanged for most conditions. Only with prolonged exposure to acidic conditions at 37 °C, sialylation decreased significantly and subtle changes occurred for galactosylation. Consequently, provided that long or intense heating in acidic solutions is avoided, sample preparation for bottom-up glycoproteomics does not introduce conceivable biases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7539295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75392952020-10-07 Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing Amez-Martín, Manuela Wuhrer, Manfred Falck, David J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation is a key post-translational modification in regulating IgG function. It is therefore a prominent target for biomarker discovery and a critical quality attribute of antibody-based biopharmaceuticals. A common approach for IgG glycosylation analysis is the measurement of tryptic glycopeptides. Glycosylation stability during sample processing is a key prerequisite for an accurate and robust analysis yet has hitherto hardly been studied. Especially, acid hydrolysis of sialic acids may be a source for instability. Therefore, we investigated acid denaturation, centrifugal vacuum concentration, and glycopeptide storage regarding changes in the IgG glycosylation profile. Intravenous IgG was analyzed employing imaginable deviations from a reference method and stress conditions. All glycosylation features —sialylation, galactosylation, bisection, and fucosylation—remained unchanged for most conditions. Only with prolonged exposure to acidic conditions at 37 °C, sialylation decreased significantly and subtle changes occurred for galactosylation. Consequently, provided that long or intense heating in acidic solutions is avoided, sample preparation for bottom-up glycoproteomics does not introduce conceivable biases. American Chemical Society 2020-09-18 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7539295/ /pubmed/32945168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00656 Text en This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Amez-Martín, Manuela
Wuhrer, Manfred
Falck, David
Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing
title Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing
title_full Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing
title_fullStr Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing
title_full_unstemmed Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing
title_short Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing
title_sort immunoglobulin g glycoprofiles are unaffected by common bottom-up sample processing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00656
work_keys_str_mv AT amezmartinmanuela immunoglobulingglycoprofilesareunaffectedbycommonbottomupsampleprocessing
AT wuhrermanfred immunoglobulingglycoprofilesareunaffectedbycommonbottomupsampleprocessing
AT falckdavid immunoglobulingglycoprofilesareunaffectedbycommonbottomupsampleprocessing