Cargando…

Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel

BACKGROUND: Disease severity is important when considering genes for inclusion on reproductive expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels. We applied a validated and previously published algorithm that classifies diseases into four severity categories (mild, moderate, severe, and profound) to 176 genes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arjunan, Aishwarya, Bellerose, Holly, Torres, Raul, Ben‐Shachar, Rotem, Hoffman, Jodi D., Angle, Brad, Slotnick, Robert Nathan, Simpson, Brittany N., Lewis, Andrea M., Magoulas, Pilar L., Bontempo, Kelly, Schulze, Jeanine, Tarpinian, Jennifer, Bucher, Jessica A., Dineen, Richard, Goetsch, Allison, Lazarin, Gabriel A., Johansen Taber, Katherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5762
_version_ 1783591137435451392
author Arjunan, Aishwarya
Bellerose, Holly
Torres, Raul
Ben‐Shachar, Rotem
Hoffman, Jodi D.
Angle, Brad
Slotnick, Robert Nathan
Simpson, Brittany N.
Lewis, Andrea M.
Magoulas, Pilar L.
Bontempo, Kelly
Schulze, Jeanine
Tarpinian, Jennifer
Bucher, Jessica A.
Dineen, Richard
Goetsch, Allison
Lazarin, Gabriel A.
Johansen Taber, Katherine
author_facet Arjunan, Aishwarya
Bellerose, Holly
Torres, Raul
Ben‐Shachar, Rotem
Hoffman, Jodi D.
Angle, Brad
Slotnick, Robert Nathan
Simpson, Brittany N.
Lewis, Andrea M.
Magoulas, Pilar L.
Bontempo, Kelly
Schulze, Jeanine
Tarpinian, Jennifer
Bucher, Jessica A.
Dineen, Richard
Goetsch, Allison
Lazarin, Gabriel A.
Johansen Taber, Katherine
author_sort Arjunan, Aishwarya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disease severity is important when considering genes for inclusion on reproductive expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels. We applied a validated and previously published algorithm that classifies diseases into four severity categories (mild, moderate, severe, and profound) to 176 genes screened by ECS. Disease traits defining severity categories in the algorithm were then mapped to four severity‐related ECS panel design criteria cited by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). METHODS: Eight genetic counselors (GCs) and four medical geneticists (MDs) applied the severity algorithm to subsets of 176 genes. MDs and GCs then determined by group consensus how each of these disease traits mapped to ACOG severity criteria, enabling determination of the number of ACOG severity criteria met by each gene. RESULTS: Upon consensus GC and MD application of the severity algorithm, 68 (39%) genes were classified as profound, 71 (40%) as severe, 36 (20%) as moderate, and one (1%) as mild. After mapping of disease traits to ACOG severity criteria, 170 out of 176 genes (96.6%) were found to meet at least one of the four criteria, 129 genes (73.3%) met at least two, 73 genes (41.5%) met at least three, and 17 genes (9.7%) met all four. CONCLUSION: This study classified the severity of a large set of Mendelian genes by collaborative clinical expert application of a trait‐based algorithm. Further, it operationalized difficult to interpret ACOG severity criteria via mapping of disease traits, thereby promoting consistency of ACOG criteria interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7540025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75400252020-10-09 Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel Arjunan, Aishwarya Bellerose, Holly Torres, Raul Ben‐Shachar, Rotem Hoffman, Jodi D. Angle, Brad Slotnick, Robert Nathan Simpson, Brittany N. Lewis, Andrea M. Magoulas, Pilar L. Bontempo, Kelly Schulze, Jeanine Tarpinian, Jennifer Bucher, Jessica A. Dineen, Richard Goetsch, Allison Lazarin, Gabriel A. Johansen Taber, Katherine Prenat Diagn Original Articles BACKGROUND: Disease severity is important when considering genes for inclusion on reproductive expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels. We applied a validated and previously published algorithm that classifies diseases into four severity categories (mild, moderate, severe, and profound) to 176 genes screened by ECS. Disease traits defining severity categories in the algorithm were then mapped to four severity‐related ECS panel design criteria cited by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). METHODS: Eight genetic counselors (GCs) and four medical geneticists (MDs) applied the severity algorithm to subsets of 176 genes. MDs and GCs then determined by group consensus how each of these disease traits mapped to ACOG severity criteria, enabling determination of the number of ACOG severity criteria met by each gene. RESULTS: Upon consensus GC and MD application of the severity algorithm, 68 (39%) genes were classified as profound, 71 (40%) as severe, 36 (20%) as moderate, and one (1%) as mild. After mapping of disease traits to ACOG severity criteria, 170 out of 176 genes (96.6%) were found to meet at least one of the four criteria, 129 genes (73.3%) met at least two, 73 genes (41.5%) met at least three, and 17 genes (9.7%) met all four. CONCLUSION: This study classified the severity of a large set of Mendelian genes by collaborative clinical expert application of a trait‐based algorithm. Further, it operationalized difficult to interpret ACOG severity criteria via mapping of disease traits, thereby promoting consistency of ACOG criteria interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-06-16 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7540025/ /pubmed/32474937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5762 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Arjunan, Aishwarya
Bellerose, Holly
Torres, Raul
Ben‐Shachar, Rotem
Hoffman, Jodi D.
Angle, Brad
Slotnick, Robert Nathan
Simpson, Brittany N.
Lewis, Andrea M.
Magoulas, Pilar L.
Bontempo, Kelly
Schulze, Jeanine
Tarpinian, Jennifer
Bucher, Jessica A.
Dineen, Richard
Goetsch, Allison
Lazarin, Gabriel A.
Johansen Taber, Katherine
Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
title Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
title_full Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
title_fullStr Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
title_short Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
title_sort evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5762
work_keys_str_mv AT arjunanaishwarya evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT belleroseholly evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT torresraul evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT benshacharrotem evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT hoffmanjodid evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT anglebrad evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT slotnickrobertnathan evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT simpsonbrittanyn evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT lewisandream evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT magoulaspilarl evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT bontempokelly evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT schulzejeanine evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT tarpinianjennifer evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT bucherjessicaa evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT dineenrichard evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT goetschallison evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT lazaringabriela evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel
AT johansentaberkatherine evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel