Cargando…
Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel
BACKGROUND: Disease severity is important when considering genes for inclusion on reproductive expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels. We applied a validated and previously published algorithm that classifies diseases into four severity categories (mild, moderate, severe, and profound) to 176 genes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5762 |
_version_ | 1783591137435451392 |
---|---|
author | Arjunan, Aishwarya Bellerose, Holly Torres, Raul Ben‐Shachar, Rotem Hoffman, Jodi D. Angle, Brad Slotnick, Robert Nathan Simpson, Brittany N. Lewis, Andrea M. Magoulas, Pilar L. Bontempo, Kelly Schulze, Jeanine Tarpinian, Jennifer Bucher, Jessica A. Dineen, Richard Goetsch, Allison Lazarin, Gabriel A. Johansen Taber, Katherine |
author_facet | Arjunan, Aishwarya Bellerose, Holly Torres, Raul Ben‐Shachar, Rotem Hoffman, Jodi D. Angle, Brad Slotnick, Robert Nathan Simpson, Brittany N. Lewis, Andrea M. Magoulas, Pilar L. Bontempo, Kelly Schulze, Jeanine Tarpinian, Jennifer Bucher, Jessica A. Dineen, Richard Goetsch, Allison Lazarin, Gabriel A. Johansen Taber, Katherine |
author_sort | Arjunan, Aishwarya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Disease severity is important when considering genes for inclusion on reproductive expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels. We applied a validated and previously published algorithm that classifies diseases into four severity categories (mild, moderate, severe, and profound) to 176 genes screened by ECS. Disease traits defining severity categories in the algorithm were then mapped to four severity‐related ECS panel design criteria cited by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). METHODS: Eight genetic counselors (GCs) and four medical geneticists (MDs) applied the severity algorithm to subsets of 176 genes. MDs and GCs then determined by group consensus how each of these disease traits mapped to ACOG severity criteria, enabling determination of the number of ACOG severity criteria met by each gene. RESULTS: Upon consensus GC and MD application of the severity algorithm, 68 (39%) genes were classified as profound, 71 (40%) as severe, 36 (20%) as moderate, and one (1%) as mild. After mapping of disease traits to ACOG severity criteria, 170 out of 176 genes (96.6%) were found to meet at least one of the four criteria, 129 genes (73.3%) met at least two, 73 genes (41.5%) met at least three, and 17 genes (9.7%) met all four. CONCLUSION: This study classified the severity of a large set of Mendelian genes by collaborative clinical expert application of a trait‐based algorithm. Further, it operationalized difficult to interpret ACOG severity criteria via mapping of disease traits, thereby promoting consistency of ACOG criteria interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7540025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75400252020-10-09 Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel Arjunan, Aishwarya Bellerose, Holly Torres, Raul Ben‐Shachar, Rotem Hoffman, Jodi D. Angle, Brad Slotnick, Robert Nathan Simpson, Brittany N. Lewis, Andrea M. Magoulas, Pilar L. Bontempo, Kelly Schulze, Jeanine Tarpinian, Jennifer Bucher, Jessica A. Dineen, Richard Goetsch, Allison Lazarin, Gabriel A. Johansen Taber, Katherine Prenat Diagn Original Articles BACKGROUND: Disease severity is important when considering genes for inclusion on reproductive expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels. We applied a validated and previously published algorithm that classifies diseases into four severity categories (mild, moderate, severe, and profound) to 176 genes screened by ECS. Disease traits defining severity categories in the algorithm were then mapped to four severity‐related ECS panel design criteria cited by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). METHODS: Eight genetic counselors (GCs) and four medical geneticists (MDs) applied the severity algorithm to subsets of 176 genes. MDs and GCs then determined by group consensus how each of these disease traits mapped to ACOG severity criteria, enabling determination of the number of ACOG severity criteria met by each gene. RESULTS: Upon consensus GC and MD application of the severity algorithm, 68 (39%) genes were classified as profound, 71 (40%) as severe, 36 (20%) as moderate, and one (1%) as mild. After mapping of disease traits to ACOG severity criteria, 170 out of 176 genes (96.6%) were found to meet at least one of the four criteria, 129 genes (73.3%) met at least two, 73 genes (41.5%) met at least three, and 17 genes (9.7%) met all four. CONCLUSION: This study classified the severity of a large set of Mendelian genes by collaborative clinical expert application of a trait‐based algorithm. Further, it operationalized difficult to interpret ACOG severity criteria via mapping of disease traits, thereby promoting consistency of ACOG criteria interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-06-16 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7540025/ /pubmed/32474937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5762 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Arjunan, Aishwarya Bellerose, Holly Torres, Raul Ben‐Shachar, Rotem Hoffman, Jodi D. Angle, Brad Slotnick, Robert Nathan Simpson, Brittany N. Lewis, Andrea M. Magoulas, Pilar L. Bontempo, Kelly Schulze, Jeanine Tarpinian, Jennifer Bucher, Jessica A. Dineen, Richard Goetsch, Allison Lazarin, Gabriel A. Johansen Taber, Katherine Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
title | Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
title_full | Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
title_short | Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
title_sort | evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arjunanaishwarya evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT belleroseholly evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT torresraul evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT benshacharrotem evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT hoffmanjodid evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT anglebrad evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT slotnickrobertnathan evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT simpsonbrittanyn evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT lewisandream evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT magoulaspilarl evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT bontempokelly evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT schulzejeanine evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT tarpinianjennifer evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT bucherjessicaa evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT dineenrichard evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT goetschallison evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT lazaringabriela evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel AT johansentaberkatherine evaluationandclassificationofseverityfor176genesonanexpandedcarrierscreeningpanel |