Cargando…
Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices
BACKGROUND: As part of a five year plan (2019–2023), the Informed Health Choices Project, is developing and evaluating resources for helping secondary school students learn to think critically about health claims and choices. We will bring together key stakeholders; such as secondary school teachers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239985 |
_version_ | 1783592851781713920 |
---|---|
author | Nsangi, Allen Oxman, Andrew David Oxman, Matt Rosenbaum, Sarah E. Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Mugisha, Michael Chelagat, Faith Kaseje, Margaret Nyirazinyoye, Leaticia Chalmers, Iain Sewankambo, Nelson Kaulukusi |
author_facet | Nsangi, Allen Oxman, Andrew David Oxman, Matt Rosenbaum, Sarah E. Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Mugisha, Michael Chelagat, Faith Kaseje, Margaret Nyirazinyoye, Leaticia Chalmers, Iain Sewankambo, Nelson Kaulukusi |
author_sort | Nsangi, Allen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As part of a five year plan (2019–2023), the Informed Health Choices Project, is developing and evaluating resources for helping secondary school students learn to think critically about health claims and choices. We will bring together key stakeholders; such as secondary school teachers and students, our main target for the IHC secondary school resources, school administrators, policy makers, curriculum development specialists and parents, to enable us gain insight about the context. OBJECTIVES: 1. To ensure that stakeholders are effectively and appropriately engaged in the design, evaluation and dissemination of the learning resources. 2. To evaluate the extent to which stakeholders were successfully engaged. METHODS: Using a multi-stage stratified sampling method, we will identify a representative sample of secondary schools with varied characteristics that might modify the effects of the learning resources such as, the school location (rural, semi-urban or urban), ownership (private, public) and ICT facilities (under resourced, highly resourced). A sample of schools will be randomly selected from the schools in each stratum. We will aim to recruit a diverse sample of students and secondary school teachers from those schools. Other stakeholders will be purposively selected to ensure a diverse range of experience and expertise. RESULTS: Together with the teacher and student networks and the advisory panels, we will establish measurable success criteria that reflect the objectives of engaging stakeholders at the start of the project and evaluate the extent to which those criteria were met at the end of the project. CONCLUSION: We aim for an increase in research uptake, improve quality and appropriateness of research results, accountability and social justice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7549807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75498072020-10-20 Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices Nsangi, Allen Oxman, Andrew David Oxman, Matt Rosenbaum, Sarah E. Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Mugisha, Michael Chelagat, Faith Kaseje, Margaret Nyirazinyoye, Leaticia Chalmers, Iain Sewankambo, Nelson Kaulukusi PLoS One Registered Report Protocol BACKGROUND: As part of a five year plan (2019–2023), the Informed Health Choices Project, is developing and evaluating resources for helping secondary school students learn to think critically about health claims and choices. We will bring together key stakeholders; such as secondary school teachers and students, our main target for the IHC secondary school resources, school administrators, policy makers, curriculum development specialists and parents, to enable us gain insight about the context. OBJECTIVES: 1. To ensure that stakeholders are effectively and appropriately engaged in the design, evaluation and dissemination of the learning resources. 2. To evaluate the extent to which stakeholders were successfully engaged. METHODS: Using a multi-stage stratified sampling method, we will identify a representative sample of secondary schools with varied characteristics that might modify the effects of the learning resources such as, the school location (rural, semi-urban or urban), ownership (private, public) and ICT facilities (under resourced, highly resourced). A sample of schools will be randomly selected from the schools in each stratum. We will aim to recruit a diverse sample of students and secondary school teachers from those schools. Other stakeholders will be purposively selected to ensure a diverse range of experience and expertise. RESULTS: Together with the teacher and student networks and the advisory panels, we will establish measurable success criteria that reflect the objectives of engaging stakeholders at the start of the project and evaluate the extent to which those criteria were met at the end of the project. CONCLUSION: We aim for an increase in research uptake, improve quality and appropriateness of research results, accountability and social justice. Public Library of Science 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7549807/ /pubmed/33045009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239985 Text en © 2020 Nsangi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Registered Report Protocol Nsangi, Allen Oxman, Andrew David Oxman, Matt Rosenbaum, Sarah E. Semakula, Daniel Ssenyonga, Ronald Mugisha, Michael Chelagat, Faith Kaseje, Margaret Nyirazinyoye, Leaticia Chalmers, Iain Sewankambo, Nelson Kaulukusi Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
title | Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
title_full | Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
title_fullStr | Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
title_short | Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
title_sort | protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the informed health choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices |
topic | Registered Report Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nsangiallen protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT oxmanandrewdavid protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT oxmanmatt protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT rosenbaumsarahe protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT semakuladaniel protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT ssenyongaronald protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT mugishamichael protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT chelagatfaith protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT kasejemargaret protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT nyirazinyoyeleaticia protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT chalmersiain protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices AT sewankambonelsonkaulukusi protocolforassessingstakeholderengagementinthedevelopmentandevaluationoftheinformedhealthchoicesresourcesteachingsecondaryschoolstudentstothinkcriticallyabouthealthclaimsandchoices |