Cargando…

Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors

The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isaacs, Darren, Mikasi, Sello Given, Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel, Ikomey, George Mondinde, Shityakov, Sergey, Cloete, Ruben, Jacobs, Graeme Brendon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12090936
_version_ 1783593313345994752
author Isaacs, Darren
Mikasi, Sello Given
Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel
Ikomey, George Mondinde
Shityakov, Sergey
Cloete, Ruben
Jacobs, Graeme Brendon
author_facet Isaacs, Darren
Mikasi, Sello Given
Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel
Ikomey, George Mondinde
Shityakov, Sergey
Cloete, Ruben
Jacobs, Graeme Brendon
author_sort Isaacs, Darren
collection PubMed
description The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) having been approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Due to high HIV-1 diversity, it is not well understood how specific naturally occurring polymorphisms (NOPs) in IN may affect the structure/function and binding affinity of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We applied computational methods of molecular modelling and docking to analyze the effect of NOPs on the full-length IN structure and INSTI binding. We identified 13 NOPs within the Cameroonian-derived CRF02_AG IN sequences and further identified 17 NOPs within HIV-1C South African sequences. The NOPs in the IN structures did not show any differences in INSTI binding affinity. However, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Ki and EC50 values for DTG and BIC as strong inhibitors of HIV-1 IN subtypes. All INSTIs are clinically effective against diverse HIV-1 strains from INSTI treatment-naïve populations. This study supports the use of second-generation INSTIs such as DTG and BIC as part of first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens, due to a stronger genetic barrier to the emergence of drug resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7552036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75520362020-10-14 Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors Isaacs, Darren Mikasi, Sello Given Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Ikomey, George Mondinde Shityakov, Sergey Cloete, Ruben Jacobs, Graeme Brendon Viruses Article The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) having been approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Due to high HIV-1 diversity, it is not well understood how specific naturally occurring polymorphisms (NOPs) in IN may affect the structure/function and binding affinity of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We applied computational methods of molecular modelling and docking to analyze the effect of NOPs on the full-length IN structure and INSTI binding. We identified 13 NOPs within the Cameroonian-derived CRF02_AG IN sequences and further identified 17 NOPs within HIV-1C South African sequences. The NOPs in the IN structures did not show any differences in INSTI binding affinity. However, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Ki and EC50 values for DTG and BIC as strong inhibitors of HIV-1 IN subtypes. All INSTIs are clinically effective against diverse HIV-1 strains from INSTI treatment-naïve populations. This study supports the use of second-generation INSTIs such as DTG and BIC as part of first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens, due to a stronger genetic barrier to the emergence of drug resistance. MDPI 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7552036/ /pubmed/32858802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12090936 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Isaacs, Darren
Mikasi, Sello Given
Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel
Ikomey, George Mondinde
Shityakov, Sergey
Cloete, Ruben
Jacobs, Graeme Brendon
Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
title Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
title_full Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
title_fullStr Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
title_short Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
title_sort structural comparison of diverse hiv-1 subtypes using molecular modelling and docking analyses of integrase inhibitors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12090936
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacsdarren structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors
AT mikasisellogiven structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors
AT obasaadetayoemmanuel structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors
AT ikomeygeorgemondinde structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors
AT shityakovsergey structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors
AT cloeteruben structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors
AT jacobsgraemebrendon structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors