Cargando…
Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors
The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12090936 |
_version_ | 1783593313345994752 |
---|---|
author | Isaacs, Darren Mikasi, Sello Given Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Ikomey, George Mondinde Shityakov, Sergey Cloete, Ruben Jacobs, Graeme Brendon |
author_facet | Isaacs, Darren Mikasi, Sello Given Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Ikomey, George Mondinde Shityakov, Sergey Cloete, Ruben Jacobs, Graeme Brendon |
author_sort | Isaacs, Darren |
collection | PubMed |
description | The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) having been approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Due to high HIV-1 diversity, it is not well understood how specific naturally occurring polymorphisms (NOPs) in IN may affect the structure/function and binding affinity of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We applied computational methods of molecular modelling and docking to analyze the effect of NOPs on the full-length IN structure and INSTI binding. We identified 13 NOPs within the Cameroonian-derived CRF02_AG IN sequences and further identified 17 NOPs within HIV-1C South African sequences. The NOPs in the IN structures did not show any differences in INSTI binding affinity. However, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Ki and EC50 values for DTG and BIC as strong inhibitors of HIV-1 IN subtypes. All INSTIs are clinically effective against diverse HIV-1 strains from INSTI treatment-naïve populations. This study supports the use of second-generation INSTIs such as DTG and BIC as part of first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens, due to a stronger genetic barrier to the emergence of drug resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7552036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75520362020-10-14 Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors Isaacs, Darren Mikasi, Sello Given Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Ikomey, George Mondinde Shityakov, Sergey Cloete, Ruben Jacobs, Graeme Brendon Viruses Article The process of viral integration into the host genome is an essential step of the HIV-1 life cycle. The viral integrase (IN) enzyme catalyzes integration. IN is an ideal therapeutic enzyme targeted by several drugs; raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) having been approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Due to high HIV-1 diversity, it is not well understood how specific naturally occurring polymorphisms (NOPs) in IN may affect the structure/function and binding affinity of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We applied computational methods of molecular modelling and docking to analyze the effect of NOPs on the full-length IN structure and INSTI binding. We identified 13 NOPs within the Cameroonian-derived CRF02_AG IN sequences and further identified 17 NOPs within HIV-1C South African sequences. The NOPs in the IN structures did not show any differences in INSTI binding affinity. However, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Ki and EC50 values for DTG and BIC as strong inhibitors of HIV-1 IN subtypes. All INSTIs are clinically effective against diverse HIV-1 strains from INSTI treatment-naïve populations. This study supports the use of second-generation INSTIs such as DTG and BIC as part of first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens, due to a stronger genetic barrier to the emergence of drug resistance. MDPI 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7552036/ /pubmed/32858802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12090936 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Isaacs, Darren Mikasi, Sello Given Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Ikomey, George Mondinde Shityakov, Sergey Cloete, Ruben Jacobs, Graeme Brendon Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors |
title | Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors |
title_full | Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors |
title_fullStr | Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors |
title_full_unstemmed | Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors |
title_short | Structural Comparison of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes using Molecular Modelling and Docking Analyses of Integrase Inhibitors |
title_sort | structural comparison of diverse hiv-1 subtypes using molecular modelling and docking analyses of integrase inhibitors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12090936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isaacsdarren structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors AT mikasisellogiven structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors AT obasaadetayoemmanuel structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors AT ikomeygeorgemondinde structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors AT shityakovsergey structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors AT cloeteruben structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors AT jacobsgraemebrendon structuralcomparisonofdiversehiv1subtypesusingmolecularmodellinganddockinganalysesofintegraseinhibitors |