Cargando…

Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Boar taint is an unpleasant smell and taste of fat of uncastrated male pigs. Growing welfare concerns are pushing towards a ban on the common practice of castrating male piglets as a means to prevent boar taint. This pushes the pork industry to apply alternative strategies to prevent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heyrman, Evert, Janssens, Steven, Buys, Nadine, Vanhaecke, Lynn, Millet, Sam, Tuyttens, Frank A. M., Wauters, Jella, Aluwé, Marijke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10091684
_version_ 1783593471713476608
author Heyrman, Evert
Janssens, Steven
Buys, Nadine
Vanhaecke, Lynn
Millet, Sam
Tuyttens, Frank A. M.
Wauters, Jella
Aluwé, Marijke
author_facet Heyrman, Evert
Janssens, Steven
Buys, Nadine
Vanhaecke, Lynn
Millet, Sam
Tuyttens, Frank A. M.
Wauters, Jella
Aluwé, Marijke
author_sort Heyrman, Evert
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Boar taint is an unpleasant smell and taste of fat of uncastrated male pigs. Growing welfare concerns are pushing towards a ban on the common practice of castrating male piglets as a means to prevent boar taint. This pushes the pork industry to apply alternative strategies to prevent the consumption of tainted of meat. Detecting boar taint is an important aspect of solving this problem, both as a control strategy in slaughterhouses and in boar taint research. This study provides a training protocol and scoring method as well as recommendations for evaluating boar taint. ABSTRACT: Trained expert panels are used routinely in boar taint research, with varying protocols for training of panelists and scoring methods. We describe a standardized process for training and scoring, to contribute to standardize the olfactory detection of boar taint. Three experiments are described in which we (1) evaluate the importance of training and the effect of the previous sample, (2) determine detection thresholds on strips and in fat for our panel, and (3) test priming panelists before boar taint evaluation. For the final evaluation of boar taint, we propose a consistent three-person evaluation scoring on a 0–4 scale using a final mean score of 0.5 as the cut-off for boar taint. This gave an optimal sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.56 compared to chemical cut-offs. Even limited training proved useful, but priming assessors with strips did not improve the evaluation of fat samples. Detection thresholds were higher in fat compared to strips, except for indole. We recommend panelists to always smell a non-tainted control sample after a tainted one as a ‘reset’ mechanism, before continuing. For longitudinal studies, we additionally advise to set up an expert panel with a fixed number of assessors performing each evaluation in duplicate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7552758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75527582020-10-19 Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint Heyrman, Evert Janssens, Steven Buys, Nadine Vanhaecke, Lynn Millet, Sam Tuyttens, Frank A. M. Wauters, Jella Aluwé, Marijke Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Boar taint is an unpleasant smell and taste of fat of uncastrated male pigs. Growing welfare concerns are pushing towards a ban on the common practice of castrating male piglets as a means to prevent boar taint. This pushes the pork industry to apply alternative strategies to prevent the consumption of tainted of meat. Detecting boar taint is an important aspect of solving this problem, both as a control strategy in slaughterhouses and in boar taint research. This study provides a training protocol and scoring method as well as recommendations for evaluating boar taint. ABSTRACT: Trained expert panels are used routinely in boar taint research, with varying protocols for training of panelists and scoring methods. We describe a standardized process for training and scoring, to contribute to standardize the olfactory detection of boar taint. Three experiments are described in which we (1) evaluate the importance of training and the effect of the previous sample, (2) determine detection thresholds on strips and in fat for our panel, and (3) test priming panelists before boar taint evaluation. For the final evaluation of boar taint, we propose a consistent three-person evaluation scoring on a 0–4 scale using a final mean score of 0.5 as the cut-off for boar taint. This gave an optimal sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.56 compared to chemical cut-offs. Even limited training proved useful, but priming assessors with strips did not improve the evaluation of fat samples. Detection thresholds were higher in fat compared to strips, except for indole. We recommend panelists to always smell a non-tainted control sample after a tainted one as a ‘reset’ mechanism, before continuing. For longitudinal studies, we additionally advise to set up an expert panel with a fixed number of assessors performing each evaluation in duplicate. MDPI 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7552758/ /pubmed/32957708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10091684 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heyrman, Evert
Janssens, Steven
Buys, Nadine
Vanhaecke, Lynn
Millet, Sam
Tuyttens, Frank A. M.
Wauters, Jella
Aluwé, Marijke
Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
title Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
title_full Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
title_fullStr Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
title_full_unstemmed Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
title_short Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
title_sort developing and understanding olfactory evaluation of boar taint
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10091684
work_keys_str_mv AT heyrmanevert developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT janssenssteven developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT buysnadine developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT vanhaeckelynn developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT milletsam developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT tuyttensfrankam developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT wautersjella developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint
AT aluwemarijke developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint