Cargando…
Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Boar taint is an unpleasant smell and taste of fat of uncastrated male pigs. Growing welfare concerns are pushing towards a ban on the common practice of castrating male piglets as a means to prevent boar taint. This pushes the pork industry to apply alternative strategies to prevent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10091684 |
_version_ | 1783593471713476608 |
---|---|
author | Heyrman, Evert Janssens, Steven Buys, Nadine Vanhaecke, Lynn Millet, Sam Tuyttens, Frank A. M. Wauters, Jella Aluwé, Marijke |
author_facet | Heyrman, Evert Janssens, Steven Buys, Nadine Vanhaecke, Lynn Millet, Sam Tuyttens, Frank A. M. Wauters, Jella Aluwé, Marijke |
author_sort | Heyrman, Evert |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Boar taint is an unpleasant smell and taste of fat of uncastrated male pigs. Growing welfare concerns are pushing towards a ban on the common practice of castrating male piglets as a means to prevent boar taint. This pushes the pork industry to apply alternative strategies to prevent the consumption of tainted of meat. Detecting boar taint is an important aspect of solving this problem, both as a control strategy in slaughterhouses and in boar taint research. This study provides a training protocol and scoring method as well as recommendations for evaluating boar taint. ABSTRACT: Trained expert panels are used routinely in boar taint research, with varying protocols for training of panelists and scoring methods. We describe a standardized process for training and scoring, to contribute to standardize the olfactory detection of boar taint. Three experiments are described in which we (1) evaluate the importance of training and the effect of the previous sample, (2) determine detection thresholds on strips and in fat for our panel, and (3) test priming panelists before boar taint evaluation. For the final evaluation of boar taint, we propose a consistent three-person evaluation scoring on a 0–4 scale using a final mean score of 0.5 as the cut-off for boar taint. This gave an optimal sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.56 compared to chemical cut-offs. Even limited training proved useful, but priming assessors with strips did not improve the evaluation of fat samples. Detection thresholds were higher in fat compared to strips, except for indole. We recommend panelists to always smell a non-tainted control sample after a tainted one as a ‘reset’ mechanism, before continuing. For longitudinal studies, we additionally advise to set up an expert panel with a fixed number of assessors performing each evaluation in duplicate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7552758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75527582020-10-19 Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint Heyrman, Evert Janssens, Steven Buys, Nadine Vanhaecke, Lynn Millet, Sam Tuyttens, Frank A. M. Wauters, Jella Aluwé, Marijke Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Boar taint is an unpleasant smell and taste of fat of uncastrated male pigs. Growing welfare concerns are pushing towards a ban on the common practice of castrating male piglets as a means to prevent boar taint. This pushes the pork industry to apply alternative strategies to prevent the consumption of tainted of meat. Detecting boar taint is an important aspect of solving this problem, both as a control strategy in slaughterhouses and in boar taint research. This study provides a training protocol and scoring method as well as recommendations for evaluating boar taint. ABSTRACT: Trained expert panels are used routinely in boar taint research, with varying protocols for training of panelists and scoring methods. We describe a standardized process for training and scoring, to contribute to standardize the olfactory detection of boar taint. Three experiments are described in which we (1) evaluate the importance of training and the effect of the previous sample, (2) determine detection thresholds on strips and in fat for our panel, and (3) test priming panelists before boar taint evaluation. For the final evaluation of boar taint, we propose a consistent three-person evaluation scoring on a 0–4 scale using a final mean score of 0.5 as the cut-off for boar taint. This gave an optimal sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.56 compared to chemical cut-offs. Even limited training proved useful, but priming assessors with strips did not improve the evaluation of fat samples. Detection thresholds were higher in fat compared to strips, except for indole. We recommend panelists to always smell a non-tainted control sample after a tainted one as a ‘reset’ mechanism, before continuing. For longitudinal studies, we additionally advise to set up an expert panel with a fixed number of assessors performing each evaluation in duplicate. MDPI 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7552758/ /pubmed/32957708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10091684 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Heyrman, Evert Janssens, Steven Buys, Nadine Vanhaecke, Lynn Millet, Sam Tuyttens, Frank A. M. Wauters, Jella Aluwé, Marijke Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint |
title | Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint |
title_full | Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint |
title_fullStr | Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint |
title_short | Developing and Understanding Olfactory Evaluation of Boar Taint |
title_sort | developing and understanding olfactory evaluation of boar taint |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10091684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heyrmanevert developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT janssenssteven developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT buysnadine developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT vanhaeckelynn developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT milletsam developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT tuyttensfrankam developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT wautersjella developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint AT aluwemarijke developingandunderstandingolfactoryevaluationofboartaint |