Cargando…

Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the energy matrix values of the nonstarch polysaccharide- (NSP-) degrading enzymes, bioemulsifier (LYSOFORTE(®)), guanidinoacetic acid (CreAMINO(®)), or their combinations could be summed. The effects of these additives on the growth perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metwally, Abdallah E., Abdel-Wareth, Ahmed A. A., Saleh, Ahmed A., Amer, Shimaa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02600-3
_version_ 1783594801425285120
author Metwally, Abdallah E.
Abdel-Wareth, Ahmed A. A.
Saleh, Ahmed A.
Amer, Shimaa A.
author_facet Metwally, Abdallah E.
Abdel-Wareth, Ahmed A. A.
Saleh, Ahmed A.
Amer, Shimaa A.
author_sort Metwally, Abdallah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the energy matrix values of the nonstarch polysaccharide- (NSP-) degrading enzymes, bioemulsifier (LYSOFORTE(®)), guanidinoacetic acid (CreAMINO(®)), or their combinations could be summed. The effects of these additives on the growth performance, carcass traits, and economic value of the broiler chicken diets were evaluated. A total of 525-one-day-old Ross chicks with an initial body weight of 42.96 ± 0.87 g were haphazardly allocated into seven groups with five replicates. The seven experimental treatments are as follows: (1) basal diet with no additives (breeder recommendation), which is the control group, (2) basal diet minus 100 kcal/kg supplemented with 0.02% NSP-degrading enzymes (NSP), (3) basal diet minus 50 kcal/kg supplemented with 0.025% emulsifier (LYSOFORTE(®)), (4) basal diet minus 50 kcal/kg supplemented with 0.06% guanidinoacetic acid (CreAMINO(®)), (5) basal diet minus 150 kcal/kg supplemented with a mixture of NSP and LYSOFORTE(®) (NSPL), (6) basal diet minus 100 kcal/kg supplemented with a mixture of NSP and CreAMINO(®) (NSPC), and (7) basal diet minus 200 kcal/kg supplemented with a mixture of NSP, LYSO, and CreAMINO(®) (NSPLC). The experiment lasted for 35 days. RESULTS: It was found that the final body weight, body weight gain, and relative growth rate were significantly higher in birds fed diets supplemented with NSPL, NSPC, CreAMINO, and LYSO with the reduced energy matrix value. The overall feed conversion ratio was significantly improved due to the supplementation of NSPC, CreAMINO, NSPL, and LYSO with the reduced energy matrix value compared to the control group. Moreover, no significant effect on the carcass criteria was observed by the different treatments. As a result of the dietary supplementation with NSPL, NSPC, CreAMINO(®), and LYSO with the reduced energy matrix value, the net profit, total return, economic efficiency, and performance index were increased and the cost of feed per kg of body weight gain was decreased. CONCLUSION: The energy matrix value of NSPL, NSPC, CreAMINO(®), and LYSOFORTE could be established in the diets of broiler chickens to improve the growth performance and economic efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75591762020-10-15 Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed? Metwally, Abdallah E. Abdel-Wareth, Ahmed A. A. Saleh, Ahmed A. Amer, Shimaa A. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the energy matrix values of the nonstarch polysaccharide- (NSP-) degrading enzymes, bioemulsifier (LYSOFORTE(®)), guanidinoacetic acid (CreAMINO(®)), or their combinations could be summed. The effects of these additives on the growth performance, carcass traits, and economic value of the broiler chicken diets were evaluated. A total of 525-one-day-old Ross chicks with an initial body weight of 42.96 ± 0.87 g were haphazardly allocated into seven groups with five replicates. The seven experimental treatments are as follows: (1) basal diet with no additives (breeder recommendation), which is the control group, (2) basal diet minus 100 kcal/kg supplemented with 0.02% NSP-degrading enzymes (NSP), (3) basal diet minus 50 kcal/kg supplemented with 0.025% emulsifier (LYSOFORTE(®)), (4) basal diet minus 50 kcal/kg supplemented with 0.06% guanidinoacetic acid (CreAMINO(®)), (5) basal diet minus 150 kcal/kg supplemented with a mixture of NSP and LYSOFORTE(®) (NSPL), (6) basal diet minus 100 kcal/kg supplemented with a mixture of NSP and CreAMINO(®) (NSPC), and (7) basal diet minus 200 kcal/kg supplemented with a mixture of NSP, LYSO, and CreAMINO(®) (NSPLC). The experiment lasted for 35 days. RESULTS: It was found that the final body weight, body weight gain, and relative growth rate were significantly higher in birds fed diets supplemented with NSPL, NSPC, CreAMINO, and LYSO with the reduced energy matrix value. The overall feed conversion ratio was significantly improved due to the supplementation of NSPC, CreAMINO, NSPL, and LYSO with the reduced energy matrix value compared to the control group. Moreover, no significant effect on the carcass criteria was observed by the different treatments. As a result of the dietary supplementation with NSPL, NSPC, CreAMINO(®), and LYSO with the reduced energy matrix value, the net profit, total return, economic efficiency, and performance index were increased and the cost of feed per kg of body weight gain was decreased. CONCLUSION: The energy matrix value of NSPL, NSPC, CreAMINO(®), and LYSOFORTE could be established in the diets of broiler chickens to improve the growth performance and economic efficiency. BioMed Central 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7559176/ /pubmed/33059686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02600-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Metwally, Abdallah E.
Abdel-Wareth, Ahmed A. A.
Saleh, Ahmed A.
Amer, Shimaa A.
Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
title Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
title_full Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
title_fullStr Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
title_full_unstemmed Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
title_short Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
title_sort are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02600-3
work_keys_str_mv AT metwallyabdallahe aretheenergymatrixvaluesofthedifferentfeedadditivesinbroilerchickendietscouldbesummed
AT abdelwarethahmedaa aretheenergymatrixvaluesofthedifferentfeedadditivesinbroilerchickendietscouldbesummed
AT salehahmeda aretheenergymatrixvaluesofthedifferentfeedadditivesinbroilerchickendietscouldbesummed
AT amershimaaa aretheenergymatrixvaluesofthedifferentfeedadditivesinbroilerchickendietscouldbesummed