Cargando…

Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions

Use of dual sgRNAs is a common CRISPR/Cas9-based strategy for the creation of genetic deletions. The ease of screening combined with a rather high rate of success makes this approach a reliable genome engineering procedure. Recently, a number of studies using CRISPR/Cas9 have revealed unwanted large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blayney, Joseph, Foster, Evangeline M., Jagielowicz, Marta, Kreuzer, Mira, Morotti, Matteo, Reglinski, Katharina, Xiao, Julie Huiyuan, Hublitz, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030053
_version_ 1783595966037753856
author Blayney, Joseph
Foster, Evangeline M.
Jagielowicz, Marta
Kreuzer, Mira
Morotti, Matteo
Reglinski, Katharina
Xiao, Julie Huiyuan
Hublitz, Philip
author_facet Blayney, Joseph
Foster, Evangeline M.
Jagielowicz, Marta
Kreuzer, Mira
Morotti, Matteo
Reglinski, Katharina
Xiao, Julie Huiyuan
Hublitz, Philip
author_sort Blayney, Joseph
collection PubMed
description Use of dual sgRNAs is a common CRISPR/Cas9-based strategy for the creation of genetic deletions. The ease of screening combined with a rather high rate of success makes this approach a reliable genome engineering procedure. Recently, a number of studies using CRISPR/Cas9 have revealed unwanted large-scale rearrangements, duplications, inversions or larger-than-expected deletions. Strict quality control measures are required to validate the model system, and this crucially depends on knowing which potential experimental outcomes to expect. Using the dual sgRNA deletion approach, our team discovered high levels of excision, inversion and re-insertion at the site of targeting. We detected those at a variety of genomic loci and in several immortalized cell lines, demonstrating that inverted re-insertions are a common by-product with an overall frequency between 3% and 20%. Our findings imply an inherent danger in the misinterpretation of screening data when using only a single PCR screening. While amplification of the region of interest might classify clones as wild type (WT) based on amplicon size, secondary analyses can discover heterozygous (HET) clones among presumptive WTs, and events deemed as HET clones could potentially be full KO. As such, screening for inverted re-insertions helps in decreasing the number of clones required to obtain a full KO. With this technical note, we want to raise awareness of this phenomenon and suggest implementing a standard secondary PCR while screening for deletions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7565582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75655822020-10-26 Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions Blayney, Joseph Foster, Evangeline M. Jagielowicz, Marta Kreuzer, Mira Morotti, Matteo Reglinski, Katharina Xiao, Julie Huiyuan Hublitz, Philip Methods Protoc Technical Note Use of dual sgRNAs is a common CRISPR/Cas9-based strategy for the creation of genetic deletions. The ease of screening combined with a rather high rate of success makes this approach a reliable genome engineering procedure. Recently, a number of studies using CRISPR/Cas9 have revealed unwanted large-scale rearrangements, duplications, inversions or larger-than-expected deletions. Strict quality control measures are required to validate the model system, and this crucially depends on knowing which potential experimental outcomes to expect. Using the dual sgRNA deletion approach, our team discovered high levels of excision, inversion and re-insertion at the site of targeting. We detected those at a variety of genomic loci and in several immortalized cell lines, demonstrating that inverted re-insertions are a common by-product with an overall frequency between 3% and 20%. Our findings imply an inherent danger in the misinterpretation of screening data when using only a single PCR screening. While amplification of the region of interest might classify clones as wild type (WT) based on amplicon size, secondary analyses can discover heterozygous (HET) clones among presumptive WTs, and events deemed as HET clones could potentially be full KO. As such, screening for inverted re-insertions helps in decreasing the number of clones required to obtain a full KO. With this technical note, we want to raise awareness of this phenomenon and suggest implementing a standard secondary PCR while screening for deletions. MDPI 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7565582/ /pubmed/32751356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030053 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Blayney, Joseph
Foster, Evangeline M.
Jagielowicz, Marta
Kreuzer, Mira
Morotti, Matteo
Reglinski, Katharina
Xiao, Julie Huiyuan
Hublitz, Philip
Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions
title Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions
title_full Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions
title_fullStr Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions
title_full_unstemmed Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions
title_short Unexpectedly High Levels of Inverted Re-Insertions Using Paired sgRNAs for Genomic Deletions
title_sort unexpectedly high levels of inverted re-insertions using paired sgrnas for genomic deletions
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030053
work_keys_str_mv AT blayneyjoseph unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT fosterevangelinem unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT jagielowiczmarta unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT kreuzermira unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT morottimatteo unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT reglinskikatharina unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT xiaojuliehuiyuan unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions
AT hublitzphilip unexpectedlyhighlevelsofinvertedreinsertionsusingpairedsgrnasforgenomicdeletions