Cargando…

Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training

BACKGROUND: Little is known about contrast training and post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in a same day concurrent training model. The aim of the current study was to examine the use of two short duration (1-min and 4-min) recovery periods on drop jump performance in same day concurrent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritchie, Dean, Keogh, Justin W.L., Reaburn, Peter, Bartlett, Jonathan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083124
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10031
_version_ 1783596189847912448
author Ritchie, Dean
Keogh, Justin W.L.
Reaburn, Peter
Bartlett, Jonathan D.
author_facet Ritchie, Dean
Keogh, Justin W.L.
Reaburn, Peter
Bartlett, Jonathan D.
author_sort Ritchie, Dean
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about contrast training and post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in a same day concurrent training model. The aim of the current study was to examine the use of two short duration (1-min and 4-min) recovery periods on drop jump performance in same day concurrently trained athletes. METHODS: Ten professional Australian Rules footballers (age, 20.6 ± 1.9 yr; height, 184.8 ± 6.9 cm; body mass, 85.8 ± 8.4 kg) completed two resistance training sessions with different PAPE recovery durations; 1-min and 4-min, 1 h following a field-based endurance session. Baseline (pre) drop jumps were compared to post-test maximal drop jumps, performed after each set of three squats (where each participant was encouraged to lift as heavy as they could), to determine changes between 1-min and 4-min recovery periods. Data were analysed by fitting a mixed model (significance was set at P ≤ 0.05). Corrected Hedges’ g standardised effect sizes ±95% confidence limits were calculated using group means ± SDs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between baseline and experimental sets 1, 2 and 3 for reactive strength index (RSI), flight time, and total and relative impulse for either recovery duration. However, for contact time, 1-min baseline was significantly different from set 2 (mean difference; 95% CI [0.029; 0.000–0.057 s], P = 0.047, ES; 95% CI [−0.27; −1.20 to 0.66]). For RSI and flight time, 1-min was significantly higher than 4-min (RSI: 0.367; 0.091 to 0.642, P = 0.010, ES; 95% CI [0.52; −0.37 to 1.42]; flight time: 0.033; 0.003 to 0.063 s, P = 0.027, ES; 95% CI [0.86; −0.06 to 1.78]). DISCUSSION: Short recovery periods of 1-min may be a time-efficient form of prescribing strength-power exercise in contrast loading schemes. Longer recovery periods do not appear to benefit immediate, subsequent performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7566756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75667562020-10-19 Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training Ritchie, Dean Keogh, Justin W.L. Reaburn, Peter Bartlett, Jonathan D. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology BACKGROUND: Little is known about contrast training and post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in a same day concurrent training model. The aim of the current study was to examine the use of two short duration (1-min and 4-min) recovery periods on drop jump performance in same day concurrently trained athletes. METHODS: Ten professional Australian Rules footballers (age, 20.6 ± 1.9 yr; height, 184.8 ± 6.9 cm; body mass, 85.8 ± 8.4 kg) completed two resistance training sessions with different PAPE recovery durations; 1-min and 4-min, 1 h following a field-based endurance session. Baseline (pre) drop jumps were compared to post-test maximal drop jumps, performed after each set of three squats (where each participant was encouraged to lift as heavy as they could), to determine changes between 1-min and 4-min recovery periods. Data were analysed by fitting a mixed model (significance was set at P ≤ 0.05). Corrected Hedges’ g standardised effect sizes ±95% confidence limits were calculated using group means ± SDs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between baseline and experimental sets 1, 2 and 3 for reactive strength index (RSI), flight time, and total and relative impulse for either recovery duration. However, for contact time, 1-min baseline was significantly different from set 2 (mean difference; 95% CI [0.029; 0.000–0.057 s], P = 0.047, ES; 95% CI [−0.27; −1.20 to 0.66]). For RSI and flight time, 1-min was significantly higher than 4-min (RSI: 0.367; 0.091 to 0.642, P = 0.010, ES; 95% CI [0.52; −0.37 to 1.42]; flight time: 0.033; 0.003 to 0.063 s, P = 0.027, ES; 95% CI [0.86; −0.06 to 1.78]). DISCUSSION: Short recovery periods of 1-min may be a time-efficient form of prescribing strength-power exercise in contrast loading schemes. Longer recovery periods do not appear to benefit immediate, subsequent performance. PeerJ Inc. 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7566756/ /pubmed/33083124 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10031 Text en © 2020 Ritchie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Ritchie, Dean
Keogh, Justin W.L.
Reaburn, Peter
Bartlett, Jonathan D.
Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
title Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
title_full Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
title_fullStr Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
title_full_unstemmed Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
title_short Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
title_sort utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training
topic Anatomy and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083124
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10031
work_keys_str_mv AT ritchiedean utilisingoneminuteandfourminuterecoverywhenemployingtheresistancetrainingcontrastmethoddoesnotnegativelyaffectsubsequentjumpperformanceinthepresenceofconcurrenttraining
AT keoghjustinwl utilisingoneminuteandfourminuterecoverywhenemployingtheresistancetrainingcontrastmethoddoesnotnegativelyaffectsubsequentjumpperformanceinthepresenceofconcurrenttraining
AT reaburnpeter utilisingoneminuteandfourminuterecoverywhenemployingtheresistancetrainingcontrastmethoddoesnotnegativelyaffectsubsequentjumpperformanceinthepresenceofconcurrenttraining
AT bartlettjonathand utilisingoneminuteandfourminuterecoverywhenemployingtheresistancetrainingcontrastmethoddoesnotnegativelyaffectsubsequentjumpperformanceinthepresenceofconcurrenttraining