Cargando…

On single point forecasts for fat-tailed variables

We discuss common errors and fallacies when using naive “evidence based” empiricism and point forecasts for fat-tailed variables, as well as the insufficiency of using naive first-order scientific methods for tail risk management. We use the COVID-19 pandemic as the background for the discussion and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, Bar-Yam, Yaneer, Cirillo, Pasquale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7572356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.008
Descripción
Sumario:We discuss common errors and fallacies when using naive “evidence based” empiricism and point forecasts for fat-tailed variables, as well as the insufficiency of using naive first-order scientific methods for tail risk management. We use the COVID-19 pandemic as the background for the discussion and as an example of a phenomenon characterized by a multiplicative nature, and what mitigating policies must result from the statistical properties and associated risks. In doing so, we also respond to the points raised by Ioannidis et al. (2020).