Cargando…

A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()

Rapid increases in young people’s time spent using digital technology (“screen time”) in the mobile internet era have led to anxiety about long-term effects. This mixed-method US study examines childhood experiences and contextual factors that shape screen time in the transition to adulthood. We rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mollborn, Stefanie, Fomby, Paula, Goode, Joshua A., Modile, Adenife
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100379
_version_ 1783597692196225024
author Mollborn, Stefanie
Fomby, Paula
Goode, Joshua A.
Modile, Adenife
author_facet Mollborn, Stefanie
Fomby, Paula
Goode, Joshua A.
Modile, Adenife
author_sort Mollborn, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description Rapid increases in young people’s time spent using digital technology (“screen time”) in the mobile internet era have led to anxiety about long-term effects. This mixed-method US study examines childhood experiences and contextual factors that shape screen time in the transition to adulthood. We recursively analyzed 56 qualitative interviews with young adults in a large metropolitan area in 2016–2018 and prospective longitudinal nationally representative survey data (PSID-CDS-2007 and PSID-TAS-2017) to articulate a conceptual framework of life course influences on young adults’ time spent using digital technologies. Inductive qualitative analyses built an initial framework, which was assessed with quantitative data, then further refined with qualitative analyses. Young adults drew on life course perspectives when discussing influences on their current digital technology use. As they suggested, in quantitative analyses more frequent adolescent technology use and greater device access weakly predicted increased technology frequency. Current school enrollment and several current peer factors predicted technology time. Interviewees emphasized the influence of parenting around technology use during adolescence, but parenting did not predict young adult screen time in quantitative analyses. Further qualitative analyses suggested that instead of influencing current technology time, earlier parenting shaped current emotional responses and imagined future technology use. We found young adults’ technology use frequency to be informed by earlier experiences but highly malleable. Past technology use and current social contexts matter, but only up to a point. Moving beyond time use to incorporate emotional responses and future plans can better capture how the life course shapes technology use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7574782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75747822020-10-21 A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood() Mollborn, Stefanie Fomby, Paula Goode, Joshua A. Modile, Adenife Current Perspectives on Aging and the Life Cycle Article Rapid increases in young people’s time spent using digital technology (“screen time”) in the mobile internet era have led to anxiety about long-term effects. This mixed-method US study examines childhood experiences and contextual factors that shape screen time in the transition to adulthood. We recursively analyzed 56 qualitative interviews with young adults in a large metropolitan area in 2016–2018 and prospective longitudinal nationally representative survey data (PSID-CDS-2007 and PSID-TAS-2017) to articulate a conceptual framework of life course influences on young adults’ time spent using digital technologies. Inductive qualitative analyses built an initial framework, which was assessed with quantitative data, then further refined with qualitative analyses. Young adults drew on life course perspectives when discussing influences on their current digital technology use. As they suggested, in quantitative analyses more frequent adolescent technology use and greater device access weakly predicted increased technology frequency. Current school enrollment and several current peer factors predicted technology time. Interviewees emphasized the influence of parenting around technology use during adolescence, but parenting did not predict young adult screen time in quantitative analyses. Further qualitative analyses suggested that instead of influencing current technology time, earlier parenting shaped current emotional responses and imagined future technology use. We found young adults’ technology use frequency to be informed by earlier experiences but highly malleable. Past technology use and current social contexts matter, but only up to a point. Moving beyond time use to incorporate emotional responses and future plans can better capture how the life course shapes technology use. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-03 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7574782/ /pubmed/36695150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100379 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Mollborn, Stefanie
Fomby, Paula
Goode, Joshua A.
Modile, Adenife
A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
title A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
title_full A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
title_fullStr A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
title_full_unstemmed A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
title_short A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
title_sort life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100379
work_keys_str_mv AT mollbornstefanie alifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT fombypaula alifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT goodejoshuaa alifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT modileadenife alifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT mollbornstefanie lifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT fombypaula lifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT goodejoshuaa lifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood
AT modileadenife lifecourseframeworkforunderstandingdigitaltechnologyuseinthetransitiontoadulthood