Cargando…

Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells cycle between lymphoid tissue sites where they actively proliferate, and the peripheral blood (PB) where they become quiescent. Strong evidence exists for a crucial role of B cell receptor (BCR) triggering, either by (self-)antigen or by receptor auto-engagem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haselager, Marco V., Kater, Arnon P., Eldering, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.592205
_version_ 1783598395172061184
author Haselager, Marco V.
Kater, Arnon P.
Eldering, Eric
author_facet Haselager, Marco V.
Kater, Arnon P.
Eldering, Eric
author_sort Haselager, Marco V.
collection PubMed
description Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells cycle between lymphoid tissue sites where they actively proliferate, and the peripheral blood (PB) where they become quiescent. Strong evidence exists for a crucial role of B cell receptor (BCR) triggering, either by (self-)antigen or by receptor auto-engagement in the lymph node (LN) to drive CLL proliferation and provide adhesion. The clinical success of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors is widely accepted to be based on blockade of the BCR signal. Additional signals in the LN that support CLL survival derive from surrounding cells, such as CD40L-presenting T helper cells, myeloid and stromal cells. It is not quite clear if and to what extent these non-BCR signals contribute to proliferation in situ. In vitro BCR triggering, in contrast, leads to low-level activation and does not result in cell division. Various combinations of non-BCR signals delivered via co-stimulatory receptors, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and/or soluble cytokines are applied, leading to comparatively modest and short-lived CLL proliferation in vitro. Thus, an unresolved gap exists between the condition in the patient as we now understand it and applicable knowledge that can be harnessed in the laboratory for future therapeutic applications. Even in this era of targeted drugs, CLL remains largely incurable with frequent relapses and emergence of resistance. Therefore, we require better insight into all aspects of CLL growth and potential rewiring of signaling pathways. We aim here to provide an overview of in vivo versus in vitro signals involved in CLL proliferation, point out areas of missing knowledge and suggest future directions for research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7578574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75785742020-10-30 Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing? Haselager, Marco V. Kater, Arnon P. Eldering, Eric Front Oncol Oncology Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells cycle between lymphoid tissue sites where they actively proliferate, and the peripheral blood (PB) where they become quiescent. Strong evidence exists for a crucial role of B cell receptor (BCR) triggering, either by (self-)antigen or by receptor auto-engagement in the lymph node (LN) to drive CLL proliferation and provide adhesion. The clinical success of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors is widely accepted to be based on blockade of the BCR signal. Additional signals in the LN that support CLL survival derive from surrounding cells, such as CD40L-presenting T helper cells, myeloid and stromal cells. It is not quite clear if and to what extent these non-BCR signals contribute to proliferation in situ. In vitro BCR triggering, in contrast, leads to low-level activation and does not result in cell division. Various combinations of non-BCR signals delivered via co-stimulatory receptors, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and/or soluble cytokines are applied, leading to comparatively modest and short-lived CLL proliferation in vitro. Thus, an unresolved gap exists between the condition in the patient as we now understand it and applicable knowledge that can be harnessed in the laboratory for future therapeutic applications. Even in this era of targeted drugs, CLL remains largely incurable with frequent relapses and emergence of resistance. Therefore, we require better insight into all aspects of CLL growth and potential rewiring of signaling pathways. We aim here to provide an overview of in vivo versus in vitro signals involved in CLL proliferation, point out areas of missing knowledge and suggest future directions for research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7578574/ /pubmed/33134182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.592205 Text en Copyright © 2020 Haselager, Kater and Eldering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Haselager, Marco V.
Kater, Arnon P.
Eldering, Eric
Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?
title Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?
title_full Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?
title_fullStr Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?
title_full_unstemmed Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?
title_short Proliferative Signals in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; What Are We Missing?
title_sort proliferative signals in chronic lymphocytic leukemia; what are we missing?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.592205
work_keys_str_mv AT haselagermarcov proliferativesignalsinchroniclymphocyticleukemiawhatarewemissing
AT katerarnonp proliferativesignalsinchroniclymphocyticleukemiawhatarewemissing
AT elderingeric proliferativesignalsinchroniclymphocyticleukemiawhatarewemissing