Cargando…

Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Walking school bus programs increase children’s physical activity through active travel to school; however, research to inform large-scale implementation of such programs is limited. We investigated contextual factors, implementation outcomes, and student outcomes in existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlson, Jordan A., Steel, Chelsea, Bejarano, Carolina M., Beauchamp, Marshall T., Davis, Ann M., Sallis, James F., Kerner, Jon, Brownson, Ross, Zimmerman, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059796
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200061
_version_ 1783600151673176064
author Carlson, Jordan A.
Steel, Chelsea
Bejarano, Carolina M.
Beauchamp, Marshall T.
Davis, Ann M.
Sallis, James F.
Kerner, Jon
Brownson, Ross
Zimmerman, Sara
author_facet Carlson, Jordan A.
Steel, Chelsea
Bejarano, Carolina M.
Beauchamp, Marshall T.
Davis, Ann M.
Sallis, James F.
Kerner, Jon
Brownson, Ross
Zimmerman, Sara
author_sort Carlson, Jordan A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Walking school bus programs increase children’s physical activity through active travel to school; however, research to inform large-scale implementation of such programs is limited. We investigated contextual factors, implementation outcomes, and student outcomes in existing walking school bus programs in the United States and internationally. INTERVENTION APPROACH: Walking school bus programs involve a group of children walking to school together with an adult leader. On the trip to school, these adults provide social support, address potential traffic and interpersonal safety, and serve as role models to the children while children increase their physical activity levels. EVALUATION METHODS: We conducted surveys with existing walking school bus programs identified through internet searches, referrals, and relevant email listservs. Leaders from 184 programs that operated at least 1 trip per week completed the survey. We used regression analyses to compare differences in contextual factors by area income and location, associations between contextual factors and implementation outcomes, and associations between implementation outcomes and student outcomes. RESULTS: Walking school bus programs in low-income communities had more route leaders and engaged in more active travel to school-related activities of being sustained than those in higher income. Programs that had no external funding, multiple route leaders, and coordination by a school or district staff member (as opposed to a parent) had greater student participation than other programs. Providing more trips than other programs per week was associated with reduced tardiness, reduced bullying, and improved neighborhood walkability. The greatest barriers to implementation were recruiting and maintaining students and identifying and maintaining route leaders. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Walking school bus programs can be implemented successfully in many contexts using various models. The involvement of several people in leadership roles is critical for sustainability. Evidence-based implementation strategies that overcome barriers can improve reach, implementation, and sustainability of walking school bus programs and can increase children’s physical activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7587300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75873002020-10-28 Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018 Carlson, Jordan A. Steel, Chelsea Bejarano, Carolina M. Beauchamp, Marshall T. Davis, Ann M. Sallis, James F. Kerner, Jon Brownson, Ross Zimmerman, Sara Prev Chronic Dis Implementation Evaluation PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Walking school bus programs increase children’s physical activity through active travel to school; however, research to inform large-scale implementation of such programs is limited. We investigated contextual factors, implementation outcomes, and student outcomes in existing walking school bus programs in the United States and internationally. INTERVENTION APPROACH: Walking school bus programs involve a group of children walking to school together with an adult leader. On the trip to school, these adults provide social support, address potential traffic and interpersonal safety, and serve as role models to the children while children increase their physical activity levels. EVALUATION METHODS: We conducted surveys with existing walking school bus programs identified through internet searches, referrals, and relevant email listservs. Leaders from 184 programs that operated at least 1 trip per week completed the survey. We used regression analyses to compare differences in contextual factors by area income and location, associations between contextual factors and implementation outcomes, and associations between implementation outcomes and student outcomes. RESULTS: Walking school bus programs in low-income communities had more route leaders and engaged in more active travel to school-related activities of being sustained than those in higher income. Programs that had no external funding, multiple route leaders, and coordination by a school or district staff member (as opposed to a parent) had greater student participation than other programs. Providing more trips than other programs per week was associated with reduced tardiness, reduced bullying, and improved neighborhood walkability. The greatest barriers to implementation were recruiting and maintaining students and identifying and maintaining route leaders. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Walking school bus programs can be implemented successfully in many contexts using various models. The involvement of several people in leadership roles is critical for sustainability. Evidence-based implementation strategies that overcome barriers can improve reach, implementation, and sustainability of walking school bus programs and can increase children’s physical activity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7587300/ /pubmed/33059796 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200061 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Preventing Chronic Disease is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Implementation Evaluation
Carlson, Jordan A.
Steel, Chelsea
Bejarano, Carolina M.
Beauchamp, Marshall T.
Davis, Ann M.
Sallis, James F.
Kerner, Jon
Brownson, Ross
Zimmerman, Sara
Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018
title Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018
title_full Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018
title_fullStr Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018
title_full_unstemmed Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018
title_short Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017–2018
title_sort walking school bus programs: implementation factors, implementation outcomes, and student outcomes, 2017–2018
topic Implementation Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059796
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200061
work_keys_str_mv AT carlsonjordana walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT steelchelsea walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT bejaranocarolinam walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT beauchampmarshallt walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT davisannm walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT sallisjamesf walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT kernerjon walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT brownsonross walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018
AT zimmermansara walkingschoolbusprogramsimplementationfactorsimplementationoutcomesandstudentoutcomes20172018