Cargando…

Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?

The main goal of this study was to assess the impact of the cambered bar (CB) during the bench press exercise on power output and bar velocity when compared to a standard bar (SB). Ten healthy strength-trained men (age = 27.9 ± 3.7 years; body mass = 90.1 ± 12.5 kg; resistance training experience =...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krzysztofik, Michal, Zajac, Adam, Żmijewski, Piotr, Wilk, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.577400
_version_ 1783604547452665856
author Krzysztofik, Michal
Zajac, Adam
Żmijewski, Piotr
Wilk, Michal
author_facet Krzysztofik, Michal
Zajac, Adam
Żmijewski, Piotr
Wilk, Michal
author_sort Krzysztofik, Michal
collection PubMed
description The main goal of this study was to assess the impact of the cambered bar (CB) during the bench press exercise on power output and bar velocity when compared to a standard bar (SB). Ten healthy strength-trained men (age = 27.9 ± 3.7 years; body mass = 90.1 ± 12.5 kg; resistance training experience = 6.5 ± 2.7 years; bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) = 118.5 ± 21 kg) performed a single set of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise with an SB and a CB at 50%1RM to assess differences in peak power output (PP), mean power output (MP), peak bar velocity (PV), and mean bar velocity (MV), range of motion (ROM), and positive work time under load (TUL) between conditions. The t-test indicated significantly higher mean ROM for the cambered bar in comparison to the standard bar (52.7 vs. 44.9 cm; P < 0.01; ES = 1.40). Further, there was a significantly higher PP (907 vs. 817 W; P < 0.01; ES = 0.35), MP (556 vs. 496 W; P < 0.01; ES = 0.46), PV (1.24 vs. 1.14 m/s; P < 0.01; ES = 0.35) and MV (0.89 vs. 0.82 m/s; P < 0.01; ES = 0.34) for the CB condition when compared to the SB. A significantly longer TUL for the CB was observed, when compared to the SB (1.89 vs. 1.51 s; P < 0.01; ES = 1.38). The results of this study showed that the CB significantly increased power output and bar velocity in the bench press exercise at 50%1RM compared to the SB. Therefore, the additional ROM, made possible through the use of the CB, allows for the acceleration of the bar through a significantly longer displacement, which has a positive impact on power output. However, a simultaneous increase in TUL may cause higher fatigue when the bench press is performed with the CB compared to the SB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7606977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76069772020-11-13 Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise? Krzysztofik, Michal Zajac, Adam Żmijewski, Piotr Wilk, Michal Front Physiol Physiology The main goal of this study was to assess the impact of the cambered bar (CB) during the bench press exercise on power output and bar velocity when compared to a standard bar (SB). Ten healthy strength-trained men (age = 27.9 ± 3.7 years; body mass = 90.1 ± 12.5 kg; resistance training experience = 6.5 ± 2.7 years; bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) = 118.5 ± 21 kg) performed a single set of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise with an SB and a CB at 50%1RM to assess differences in peak power output (PP), mean power output (MP), peak bar velocity (PV), and mean bar velocity (MV), range of motion (ROM), and positive work time under load (TUL) between conditions. The t-test indicated significantly higher mean ROM for the cambered bar in comparison to the standard bar (52.7 vs. 44.9 cm; P < 0.01; ES = 1.40). Further, there was a significantly higher PP (907 vs. 817 W; P < 0.01; ES = 0.35), MP (556 vs. 496 W; P < 0.01; ES = 0.46), PV (1.24 vs. 1.14 m/s; P < 0.01; ES = 0.35) and MV (0.89 vs. 0.82 m/s; P < 0.01; ES = 0.34) for the CB condition when compared to the SB. A significantly longer TUL for the CB was observed, when compared to the SB (1.89 vs. 1.51 s; P < 0.01; ES = 1.38). The results of this study showed that the CB significantly increased power output and bar velocity in the bench press exercise at 50%1RM compared to the SB. Therefore, the additional ROM, made possible through the use of the CB, allows for the acceleration of the bar through a significantly longer displacement, which has a positive impact on power output. However, a simultaneous increase in TUL may cause higher fatigue when the bench press is performed with the CB compared to the SB. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7606977/ /pubmed/33192580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.577400 Text en Copyright © 2020 Krzysztofik, Zajac, Żmijewski and Wilk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Krzysztofik, Michal
Zajac, Adam
Żmijewski, Piotr
Wilk, Michal
Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?
title Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?
title_full Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?
title_fullStr Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?
title_full_unstemmed Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?
title_short Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?
title_sort can the cambered bar enhance acute performance in the bench press exercise?
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.577400
work_keys_str_mv AT krzysztofikmichal canthecamberedbarenhanceacuteperformanceinthebenchpressexercise
AT zajacadam canthecamberedbarenhanceacuteperformanceinthebenchpressexercise
AT zmijewskipiotr canthecamberedbarenhanceacuteperformanceinthebenchpressexercise
AT wilkmichal canthecamberedbarenhanceacuteperformanceinthebenchpressexercise