Cargando…

Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?

The present community-based study evaluated the effect of three different exercise interventions on sleep quality. Older adults were enrolled in one of three exercise intervention groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 20), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 19) or stretc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bullock, Alexis, Kovacevic, Ana, Kuhn, Tara, Heisz, Jennifer J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576316
_version_ 1783605058810675200
author Bullock, Alexis
Kovacevic, Ana
Kuhn, Tara
Heisz, Jennifer J.
author_facet Bullock, Alexis
Kovacevic, Ana
Kuhn, Tara
Heisz, Jennifer J.
author_sort Bullock, Alexis
collection PubMed
description The present community-based study evaluated the effect of three different exercise interventions on sleep quality. Older adults were enrolled in one of three exercise intervention groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 20), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 19) or stretching (STRETCH; n = 22). Prior to and following the intervention, sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI was used to classify participants as poor (global PSQI score ≥5) or good (global PSQI score >5) sleepers and the effect of the intervention was examined on poor sleepers only. Around 70% of our sample was classified as poor sleepers. Poor sleepers were significantly impaired across all PSQI components, except for the use of sleeping medication, such that neither group was heavily prescribed. Exercise improved sleep quality for poor sleepers, but the intensity mattered. Specifically, MICT and STRETCH improved sleep efficiency for poor sleepers, whereas HIIT did not (p < 0.05). The results suggest that both MICT and STRETCH may be more effective than HIIT for optimizing sleep in poor sleepers. These findings help to inform exercise guidelines for enhancing sleep in the aging population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7609693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76096932020-11-13 Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? Bullock, Alexis Kovacevic, Ana Kuhn, Tara Heisz, Jennifer J. Front Psychol Psychology The present community-based study evaluated the effect of three different exercise interventions on sleep quality. Older adults were enrolled in one of three exercise intervention groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 20), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 19) or stretching (STRETCH; n = 22). Prior to and following the intervention, sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI was used to classify participants as poor (global PSQI score ≥5) or good (global PSQI score >5) sleepers and the effect of the intervention was examined on poor sleepers only. Around 70% of our sample was classified as poor sleepers. Poor sleepers were significantly impaired across all PSQI components, except for the use of sleeping medication, such that neither group was heavily prescribed. Exercise improved sleep quality for poor sleepers, but the intensity mattered. Specifically, MICT and STRETCH improved sleep efficiency for poor sleepers, whereas HIIT did not (p < 0.05). The results suggest that both MICT and STRETCH may be more effective than HIIT for optimizing sleep in poor sleepers. These findings help to inform exercise guidelines for enhancing sleep in the aging population. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7609693/ /pubmed/33192886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576316 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bullock, Kovacevic, Kuhn and Heisz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bullock, Alexis
Kovacevic, Ana
Kuhn, Tara
Heisz, Jennifer J.
Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
title Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
title_full Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
title_fullStr Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
title_short Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
title_sort optimizing sleep in older adults: where does high-intensity interval training fit?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576316
work_keys_str_mv AT bullockalexis optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit
AT kovacevicana optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit
AT kuhntara optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit
AT heiszjenniferj optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit