Cargando…
Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?
The present community-based study evaluated the effect of three different exercise interventions on sleep quality. Older adults were enrolled in one of three exercise intervention groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 20), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 19) or stretc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576316 |
_version_ | 1783605058810675200 |
---|---|
author | Bullock, Alexis Kovacevic, Ana Kuhn, Tara Heisz, Jennifer J. |
author_facet | Bullock, Alexis Kovacevic, Ana Kuhn, Tara Heisz, Jennifer J. |
author_sort | Bullock, Alexis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present community-based study evaluated the effect of three different exercise interventions on sleep quality. Older adults were enrolled in one of three exercise intervention groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 20), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 19) or stretching (STRETCH; n = 22). Prior to and following the intervention, sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI was used to classify participants as poor (global PSQI score ≥5) or good (global PSQI score >5) sleepers and the effect of the intervention was examined on poor sleepers only. Around 70% of our sample was classified as poor sleepers. Poor sleepers were significantly impaired across all PSQI components, except for the use of sleeping medication, such that neither group was heavily prescribed. Exercise improved sleep quality for poor sleepers, but the intensity mattered. Specifically, MICT and STRETCH improved sleep efficiency for poor sleepers, whereas HIIT did not (p < 0.05). The results suggest that both MICT and STRETCH may be more effective than HIIT for optimizing sleep in poor sleepers. These findings help to inform exercise guidelines for enhancing sleep in the aging population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7609693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76096932020-11-13 Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? Bullock, Alexis Kovacevic, Ana Kuhn, Tara Heisz, Jennifer J. Front Psychol Psychology The present community-based study evaluated the effect of three different exercise interventions on sleep quality. Older adults were enrolled in one of three exercise intervention groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 20), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 19) or stretching (STRETCH; n = 22). Prior to and following the intervention, sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI was used to classify participants as poor (global PSQI score ≥5) or good (global PSQI score >5) sleepers and the effect of the intervention was examined on poor sleepers only. Around 70% of our sample was classified as poor sleepers. Poor sleepers were significantly impaired across all PSQI components, except for the use of sleeping medication, such that neither group was heavily prescribed. Exercise improved sleep quality for poor sleepers, but the intensity mattered. Specifically, MICT and STRETCH improved sleep efficiency for poor sleepers, whereas HIIT did not (p < 0.05). The results suggest that both MICT and STRETCH may be more effective than HIIT for optimizing sleep in poor sleepers. These findings help to inform exercise guidelines for enhancing sleep in the aging population. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7609693/ /pubmed/33192886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576316 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bullock, Kovacevic, Kuhn and Heisz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Bullock, Alexis Kovacevic, Ana Kuhn, Tara Heisz, Jennifer J. Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? |
title | Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? |
title_full | Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? |
title_fullStr | Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? |
title_short | Optimizing Sleep in Older Adults: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit? |
title_sort | optimizing sleep in older adults: where does high-intensity interval training fit? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bullockalexis optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit AT kovacevicana optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit AT kuhntara optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit AT heiszjenniferj optimizingsleepinolderadultswheredoeshighintensityintervaltrainingfit |