Cargando…

Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students

BACKGROUND: Medical schools have traditionally assessed medical students using long and short cases. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been found to be more reliable. AIM: To compare OSCE and traditional method of assessment in the summative assessment of final-year medical studen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N, Edeh, Anthony Jude, Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223808
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_19_20
_version_ 1783608877694058496
author Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N
Edeh, Anthony Jude
Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna
author_facet Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N
Edeh, Anthony Jude
Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna
author_sort Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical schools have traditionally assessed medical students using long and short cases. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been found to be more reliable. AIM: To compare OSCE and traditional method of assessment in the summative assessment of final-year medical students. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Enugu State University of Science and Technology College of Medicine. The Department of Internal Medicine organized clinical examinations consisting of long and short cases. The Department of Surgery organized an OSCE consisting of two parts (picture OSCE and clinical OSCE). Students' scores in both internal medicine and surgery were collated and subjected to analysis with SPSS version 23 (IBM; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlations, paired t-test was used to compare the mean scores, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of the 73 candidates, 41 were female and 32 were male giving a female: male ratio of 1.3:1. Using paired sample t test, there were significant differences between the mean score in long case (mean = 52.86, standard deviation [SD] = 4.315) and mean score in clinical OSCE (mean = 58.356, SD = 7.906), t (72) = −7.181, P = 0.000; mean score in short case (mean = 52.86, SD = 4.097) and mean score in picture OSCE (mean = 48.580, SD = 8.992, t (72) =4.558, P = 0.000; no significant difference between the mean total score in internal medicine clinicals (mean = 105.712, SD = 6.680) and mean total score in surgery clinicals (mean = 106.915, SD = 15.846), t (72) = −0.788, P = 0.433. The Cronbach's alpha for traditional examination and OSCE was 0.437 and 0.863, respectively. CONCLUSION: OSCE gives a similar mean score to traditional method, but OSCE is more reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7659750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76597502020-11-19 Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N Edeh, Anthony Jude Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna Niger J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Medical schools have traditionally assessed medical students using long and short cases. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been found to be more reliable. AIM: To compare OSCE and traditional method of assessment in the summative assessment of final-year medical students. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Enugu State University of Science and Technology College of Medicine. The Department of Internal Medicine organized clinical examinations consisting of long and short cases. The Department of Surgery organized an OSCE consisting of two parts (picture OSCE and clinical OSCE). Students' scores in both internal medicine and surgery were collated and subjected to analysis with SPSS version 23 (IBM; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlations, paired t-test was used to compare the mean scores, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of the 73 candidates, 41 were female and 32 were male giving a female: male ratio of 1.3:1. Using paired sample t test, there were significant differences between the mean score in long case (mean = 52.86, standard deviation [SD] = 4.315) and mean score in clinical OSCE (mean = 58.356, SD = 7.906), t (72) = −7.181, P = 0.000; mean score in short case (mean = 52.86, SD = 4.097) and mean score in picture OSCE (mean = 48.580, SD = 8.992, t (72) =4.558, P = 0.000; no significant difference between the mean total score in internal medicine clinicals (mean = 105.712, SD = 6.680) and mean total score in surgery clinicals (mean = 106.915, SD = 15.846), t (72) = −0.788, P = 0.433. The Cronbach's alpha for traditional examination and OSCE was 0.437 and 0.863, respectively. CONCLUSION: OSCE gives a similar mean score to traditional method, but OSCE is more reliable. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7659750/ /pubmed/33223808 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_19_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Nigerian Journal of Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N
Edeh, Anthony Jude
Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna
Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
title Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
title_full Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
title_fullStr Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
title_short Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
title_sort comparing objective structured clinical examinations and traditional clinical examinations in the summative evaluation of final-year medical students
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223808
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_19_20
work_keys_str_mv AT ezebalantineugochukwun comparingobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsandtraditionalclinicalexaminationsinthesummativeevaluationoffinalyearmedicalstudents
AT edehanthonyjude comparingobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsandtraditionalclinicalexaminationsinthesummativeevaluationoffinalyearmedicalstudents
AT ugochukwuanthonyikemefuna comparingobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsandtraditionalclinicalexaminationsinthesummativeevaluationoffinalyearmedicalstudents