Cargando…
Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students
BACKGROUND: Medical schools have traditionally assessed medical students using long and short cases. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been found to be more reliable. AIM: To compare OSCE and traditional method of assessment in the summative assessment of final-year medical studen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223808 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_19_20 |
_version_ | 1783608877694058496 |
---|---|
author | Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N Edeh, Anthony Jude Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna |
author_facet | Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N Edeh, Anthony Jude Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna |
author_sort | Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical schools have traditionally assessed medical students using long and short cases. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been found to be more reliable. AIM: To compare OSCE and traditional method of assessment in the summative assessment of final-year medical students. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Enugu State University of Science and Technology College of Medicine. The Department of Internal Medicine organized clinical examinations consisting of long and short cases. The Department of Surgery organized an OSCE consisting of two parts (picture OSCE and clinical OSCE). Students' scores in both internal medicine and surgery were collated and subjected to analysis with SPSS version 23 (IBM; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlations, paired t-test was used to compare the mean scores, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of the 73 candidates, 41 were female and 32 were male giving a female: male ratio of 1.3:1. Using paired sample t test, there were significant differences between the mean score in long case (mean = 52.86, standard deviation [SD] = 4.315) and mean score in clinical OSCE (mean = 58.356, SD = 7.906), t (72) = −7.181, P = 0.000; mean score in short case (mean = 52.86, SD = 4.097) and mean score in picture OSCE (mean = 48.580, SD = 8.992, t (72) =4.558, P = 0.000; no significant difference between the mean total score in internal medicine clinicals (mean = 105.712, SD = 6.680) and mean total score in surgery clinicals (mean = 106.915, SD = 15.846), t (72) = −0.788, P = 0.433. The Cronbach's alpha for traditional examination and OSCE was 0.437 and 0.863, respectively. CONCLUSION: OSCE gives a similar mean score to traditional method, but OSCE is more reliable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7659750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76597502020-11-19 Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N Edeh, Anthony Jude Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna Niger J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Medical schools have traditionally assessed medical students using long and short cases. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been found to be more reliable. AIM: To compare OSCE and traditional method of assessment in the summative assessment of final-year medical students. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Enugu State University of Science and Technology College of Medicine. The Department of Internal Medicine organized clinical examinations consisting of long and short cases. The Department of Surgery organized an OSCE consisting of two parts (picture OSCE and clinical OSCE). Students' scores in both internal medicine and surgery were collated and subjected to analysis with SPSS version 23 (IBM; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlations, paired t-test was used to compare the mean scores, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of the 73 candidates, 41 were female and 32 were male giving a female: male ratio of 1.3:1. Using paired sample t test, there were significant differences between the mean score in long case (mean = 52.86, standard deviation [SD] = 4.315) and mean score in clinical OSCE (mean = 58.356, SD = 7.906), t (72) = −7.181, P = 0.000; mean score in short case (mean = 52.86, SD = 4.097) and mean score in picture OSCE (mean = 48.580, SD = 8.992, t (72) =4.558, P = 0.000; no significant difference between the mean total score in internal medicine clinicals (mean = 105.712, SD = 6.680) and mean total score in surgery clinicals (mean = 106.915, SD = 15.846), t (72) = −0.788, P = 0.433. The Cronbach's alpha for traditional examination and OSCE was 0.437 and 0.863, respectively. CONCLUSION: OSCE gives a similar mean score to traditional method, but OSCE is more reliable. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7659750/ /pubmed/33223808 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_19_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Nigerian Journal of Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Eze, Balantine Ugochukwu N Edeh, Anthony Jude Ugochukwu, Anthony Ikemefuna Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students |
title | Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students |
title_full | Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students |
title_fullStr | Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students |
title_short | Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students |
title_sort | comparing objective structured clinical examinations and traditional clinical examinations in the summative evaluation of final-year medical students |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223808 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_19_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ezebalantineugochukwun comparingobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsandtraditionalclinicalexaminationsinthesummativeevaluationoffinalyearmedicalstudents AT edehanthonyjude comparingobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsandtraditionalclinicalexaminationsinthesummativeevaluationoffinalyearmedicalstudents AT ugochukwuanthonyikemefuna comparingobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsandtraditionalclinicalexaminationsinthesummativeevaluationoffinalyearmedicalstudents |