Cargando…
Empirical comparisons of multiple Mendelian randomization approaches in the presence of assortative mating
BACKGROUND: Mendelian randomization (MR) is widely used to unravel causal relationships in epidemiological studies. Whereas multiple MR methods have been developed to control for bias due to horizontal pleiotropy, their performance in the presence of other sources of bias, like non-random mating, ha...
Autores principales: | Minică, Camelia C, Boomsma, Dorret I, Dolan, Conor V, de Geus, Eco, Neale, Michael C |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa013 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Phenome-wide Mendelian-randomization study of genetically determined vitamin D on multiple health outcomes using the UK Biobank study
por: Meng, Xiangrui, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies
por: Swerdlow, Daniel I, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Contextualizing selection bias in Mendelian randomization: how bad is it likely to be?
por: Gkatzionis, Apostolos, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions
por: Rees, Jessica M B, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Cleft lip/palate and educational attainment: cause, consequence or correlation? A Mendelian randomization study
por: Dardani, Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)