Cargando…
Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method
BACKGROUND: Although electrocardiography is considered a core learning outcome for medical students, there is currently little curricular guidance for undergraduate ECG training. Owing to the absence of expert consensus on undergraduate ECG teaching, curricular content is subject to individual opini...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02354-4 |
_version_ | 1783610782296047616 |
---|---|
author | Viljoen, Charle André Millar, Rob Scott Manning, Kathryn Burch, Vanessa Celeste |
author_facet | Viljoen, Charle André Millar, Rob Scott Manning, Kathryn Burch, Vanessa Celeste |
author_sort | Viljoen, Charle André |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although electrocardiography is considered a core learning outcome for medical students, there is currently little curricular guidance for undergraduate ECG training. Owing to the absence of expert consensus on undergraduate ECG teaching, curricular content is subject to individual opinion. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to establish expert consensus amongst content and context experts on an ECG curriculum for medical students. METHODS: The Delphi technique, an established method of obtaining consensus, was used to develop an undergraduate ECG curriculum. Specialists involved in ECG teaching were invited to complete three rounds of online surveys. An undergraduate ECG curriculum was formulated from the topics of ECG instruction for which consensus (i.e. ≥75% agreement) was achieved. RESULTS: The panellists (n = 131) had a wide range of expertise (42.8% Internal Medicine, 22.9% Cardiology, 16% Family Medicine, 13.7% Emergency Medicine and 4.6% Health Professions Education). Topics that reached consensus to be included in the undergraduate ECG curriculum were classified under technical aspects of performing ECGs, basic ECG analysis, recognition of the normal ECG and abnormal rhythms and waveforms and using electrocardiography as part of a clinical diagnosis. This study emphasises that ECG teaching should be framed within the clinical context. Course conveners should not overload students with complex and voluminous content, but rather focus on commonly encountered and life-threatening conditions, where accurate diagnosis impacts on patient outcome. A list of 23 “must know” ECG diagnoses is therefore proposed. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary expert panel reached consensus on the ECG training priorities for medical students. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-020-02354-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7670661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76706612020-11-18 Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method Viljoen, Charle André Millar, Rob Scott Manning, Kathryn Burch, Vanessa Celeste BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Although electrocardiography is considered a core learning outcome for medical students, there is currently little curricular guidance for undergraduate ECG training. Owing to the absence of expert consensus on undergraduate ECG teaching, curricular content is subject to individual opinion. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to establish expert consensus amongst content and context experts on an ECG curriculum for medical students. METHODS: The Delphi technique, an established method of obtaining consensus, was used to develop an undergraduate ECG curriculum. Specialists involved in ECG teaching were invited to complete three rounds of online surveys. An undergraduate ECG curriculum was formulated from the topics of ECG instruction for which consensus (i.e. ≥75% agreement) was achieved. RESULTS: The panellists (n = 131) had a wide range of expertise (42.8% Internal Medicine, 22.9% Cardiology, 16% Family Medicine, 13.7% Emergency Medicine and 4.6% Health Professions Education). Topics that reached consensus to be included in the undergraduate ECG curriculum were classified under technical aspects of performing ECGs, basic ECG analysis, recognition of the normal ECG and abnormal rhythms and waveforms and using electrocardiography as part of a clinical diagnosis. This study emphasises that ECG teaching should be framed within the clinical context. Course conveners should not overload students with complex and voluminous content, but rather focus on commonly encountered and life-threatening conditions, where accurate diagnosis impacts on patient outcome. A list of 23 “must know” ECG diagnoses is therefore proposed. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary expert panel reached consensus on the ECG training priorities for medical students. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-020-02354-4. BioMed Central 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7670661/ /pubmed/33198726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02354-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Viljoen, Charle André Millar, Rob Scott Manning, Kathryn Burch, Vanessa Celeste Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method |
title | Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method |
title_full | Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method |
title_fullStr | Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method |
title_short | Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method |
title_sort | determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified delphi method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02354-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viljoencharleandre determiningelectrocardiographytrainingprioritiesformedicalstudentsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT millarrobscott determiningelectrocardiographytrainingprioritiesformedicalstudentsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT manningkathryn determiningelectrocardiographytrainingprioritiesformedicalstudentsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT burchvanessaceleste determiningelectrocardiographytrainingprioritiesformedicalstudentsusingamodifieddelphimethod |