Cargando…

Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations

Substrate‐binding domains (SBD) are important structural elements of substrate transporters mediating the transport of essential molecules across the cell membrane. The SBD2 domain of the glutamine (GLN) transporter from bacteria consists of two domains D1 and D2 that bind GLN in the space between t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kienlein, Maximilian, Zacharias, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3981
_version_ 1783612368291364864
author Kienlein, Maximilian
Zacharias, Martin
author_facet Kienlein, Maximilian
Zacharias, Martin
author_sort Kienlein, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description Substrate‐binding domains (SBD) are important structural elements of substrate transporters mediating the transport of essential molecules across the cell membrane. The SBD2 domain of the glutamine (GLN) transporter from bacteria consists of two domains D1 and D2 that bind GLN in the space between the domains in a closed conformation. In the absence of ligand, SBD2 adopts an open conformation with increased domain distance. In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the absence of ligands, no closing of the open conformation was observed on the MD time scale. Addition of GLN resulted in several reversible binding and unbinding events of GLN at the binding site on the D1 domain but did not induce domain closing indicating that binding and global domain closing do not occur simultaneously. The SBD2 structure remained in a closed state when starting from the GLN‐bound closed crystal structure and opened quickly to reach the open state upon removal of the GLN ligand. Free energy simulations to induce opening to closing indicated a barrier for closing in the absence and presence of ligand and a significant penalty for closing without GLN in the binding pocket. Simulations of a Leu480Ala mutation also indicate that an interaction of a C‐terminal D1‐tail(471‐484) with a D2‐helix(418‐427) (not contacting the substrate‐binding region) plays a decisive role for controlling the barrier of conformational switching in the SBD2 protein. The results allow us to derive a model of the molecular mechanism of substrate binding to SBD2 and associated conformational changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7679957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76799572020-11-27 Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations Kienlein, Maximilian Zacharias, Martin Protein Sci Full‐Length Papers Substrate‐binding domains (SBD) are important structural elements of substrate transporters mediating the transport of essential molecules across the cell membrane. The SBD2 domain of the glutamine (GLN) transporter from bacteria consists of two domains D1 and D2 that bind GLN in the space between the domains in a closed conformation. In the absence of ligand, SBD2 adopts an open conformation with increased domain distance. In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the absence of ligands, no closing of the open conformation was observed on the MD time scale. Addition of GLN resulted in several reversible binding and unbinding events of GLN at the binding site on the D1 domain but did not induce domain closing indicating that binding and global domain closing do not occur simultaneously. The SBD2 structure remained in a closed state when starting from the GLN‐bound closed crystal structure and opened quickly to reach the open state upon removal of the GLN ligand. Free energy simulations to induce opening to closing indicated a barrier for closing in the absence and presence of ligand and a significant penalty for closing without GLN in the binding pocket. Simulations of a Leu480Ala mutation also indicate that an interaction of a C‐terminal D1‐tail(471‐484) with a D2‐helix(418‐427) (not contacting the substrate‐binding region) plays a decisive role for controlling the barrier of conformational switching in the SBD2 protein. The results allow us to derive a model of the molecular mechanism of substrate binding to SBD2 and associated conformational changes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-11-03 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7679957/ /pubmed/33070437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3981 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full‐Length Papers
Kienlein, Maximilian
Zacharias, Martin
Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
title Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
title_full Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
title_fullStr Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
title_full_unstemmed Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
title_short Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
title_sort ligand binding and global adaptation of the glnpq substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
topic Full‐Length Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3981
work_keys_str_mv AT kienleinmaximilian ligandbindingandglobaladaptationoftheglnpqsubstratebindingdomain2revealedbymoleculardynamicssimulations
AT zachariasmartin ligandbindingandglobaladaptationoftheglnpqsubstratebindingdomain2revealedbymoleculardynamicssimulations