Cargando…
Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations
Substrate‐binding domains (SBD) are important structural elements of substrate transporters mediating the transport of essential molecules across the cell membrane. The SBD2 domain of the glutamine (GLN) transporter from bacteria consists of two domains D1 and D2 that bind GLN in the space between t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3981 |
_version_ | 1783612368291364864 |
---|---|
author | Kienlein, Maximilian Zacharias, Martin |
author_facet | Kienlein, Maximilian Zacharias, Martin |
author_sort | Kienlein, Maximilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Substrate‐binding domains (SBD) are important structural elements of substrate transporters mediating the transport of essential molecules across the cell membrane. The SBD2 domain of the glutamine (GLN) transporter from bacteria consists of two domains D1 and D2 that bind GLN in the space between the domains in a closed conformation. In the absence of ligand, SBD2 adopts an open conformation with increased domain distance. In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the absence of ligands, no closing of the open conformation was observed on the MD time scale. Addition of GLN resulted in several reversible binding and unbinding events of GLN at the binding site on the D1 domain but did not induce domain closing indicating that binding and global domain closing do not occur simultaneously. The SBD2 structure remained in a closed state when starting from the GLN‐bound closed crystal structure and opened quickly to reach the open state upon removal of the GLN ligand. Free energy simulations to induce opening to closing indicated a barrier for closing in the absence and presence of ligand and a significant penalty for closing without GLN in the binding pocket. Simulations of a Leu480Ala mutation also indicate that an interaction of a C‐terminal D1‐tail(471‐484) with a D2‐helix(418‐427) (not contacting the substrate‐binding region) plays a decisive role for controlling the barrier of conformational switching in the SBD2 protein. The results allow us to derive a model of the molecular mechanism of substrate binding to SBD2 and associated conformational changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7679957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76799572020-11-27 Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations Kienlein, Maximilian Zacharias, Martin Protein Sci Full‐Length Papers Substrate‐binding domains (SBD) are important structural elements of substrate transporters mediating the transport of essential molecules across the cell membrane. The SBD2 domain of the glutamine (GLN) transporter from bacteria consists of two domains D1 and D2 that bind GLN in the space between the domains in a closed conformation. In the absence of ligand, SBD2 adopts an open conformation with increased domain distance. In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the absence of ligands, no closing of the open conformation was observed on the MD time scale. Addition of GLN resulted in several reversible binding and unbinding events of GLN at the binding site on the D1 domain but did not induce domain closing indicating that binding and global domain closing do not occur simultaneously. The SBD2 structure remained in a closed state when starting from the GLN‐bound closed crystal structure and opened quickly to reach the open state upon removal of the GLN ligand. Free energy simulations to induce opening to closing indicated a barrier for closing in the absence and presence of ligand and a significant penalty for closing without GLN in the binding pocket. Simulations of a Leu480Ala mutation also indicate that an interaction of a C‐terminal D1‐tail(471‐484) with a D2‐helix(418‐427) (not contacting the substrate‐binding region) plays a decisive role for controlling the barrier of conformational switching in the SBD2 protein. The results allow us to derive a model of the molecular mechanism of substrate binding to SBD2 and associated conformational changes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-11-03 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7679957/ /pubmed/33070437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3981 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full‐Length Papers Kienlein, Maximilian Zacharias, Martin Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
title | Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
title_full | Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
title_fullStr | Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
title_short | Ligand binding and global adaptation of the GlnPQ substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
title_sort | ligand binding and global adaptation of the glnpq substrate binding domain 2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations |
topic | Full‐Length Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kienleinmaximilian ligandbindingandglobaladaptationoftheglnpqsubstratebindingdomain2revealedbymoleculardynamicssimulations AT zachariasmartin ligandbindingandglobaladaptationoftheglnpqsubstratebindingdomain2revealedbymoleculardynamicssimulations |