Cargando…

The higher the better? Defining the optimal beta-lactam target for critically ill patients to reach infection resolution and improve outcome

OBJECTIVES: Beta-lactam antibiotics are often subject to therapeutic drug monitoring, but breakpoints of target attainment are mostly based on expert opinions. Studies that show a correlation between target attainment and infection resolution are missing. This analysis investigated whether there is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scharf, Christina, Liebchen, Uwe, Paal, Michael, Taubert, Max, Vogeser, Michael, Irlbeck, Michael, Zoller, Michael, Schroeder, Ines
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00504-w
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Beta-lactam antibiotics are often subject to therapeutic drug monitoring, but breakpoints of target attainment are mostly based on expert opinions. Studies that show a correlation between target attainment and infection resolution are missing. This analysis investigated whether there is a difference in infection resolution based on two breakpoints of target attainment. METHODS: An outcome group out of 1392 critically ill patients treated with meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam was formed due to different selection criteria. Afterwards, three groups were created: group 1=free drug concentration (f) was < 100% of the time (T) above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (< 100% fT > (MIC)), group 2=100% fT > (MIC) < (4xMIC), and group 3=100% fT > (4xMIC). Parameters for infection control, renal and liver function, and estimated and observed in-hospital mortality were compared between those groups. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance, Tukey post hoc test, U test, and bivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The outcome group consisted of 55 patients (groups 1–3, 17, 24, and 14 patients, respectively). Patients allocated to group 2 or 3 had a significantly faster reduction of the C-reactive protein in contrast to patients allocated to group 1 (p = 0.033 and p = 0.026). Patients allocated to group 3 had a worse renal function, a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, were older, and had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to group 1 (p = 0.017) and group 2 (p = 0.001). The higher mortality was significantly influenced by worse liver function, higher APACHE II, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and norepinephrine therapy. CONCLUSION: Achieving the target 100% fT > (MIC) leads to faster infection resolution in the critically ill. However, there was no benefit for patients who reached the highest target of 100% fT > (4xMIC), although the mortality rate was higher possibly due to confounding effects. In conclusion, we recommend the target 100% fT > (MIC) < (4xMIC) for critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03985605 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-020-00504-w.