Cargando…

Contactless Measurement of Sheet Resistance of Nanomaterial Using Waveguide Reflection Method

Conductive nanomaterials are widely studied and used. The four-point probe method has been widely used to measure nanomaterials’ sheet resistance, denoted as [Formula: see text]. However, for materials sensitive to contamination or physical damage, contactless measurement is highly recommended if no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Ming, Tariq, Raja Usman, Zhao, Xiao-Long, Li, Wei-Da, He, Yong-Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225240
Descripción
Sumario:Conductive nanomaterials are widely studied and used. The four-point probe method has been widely used to measure nanomaterials’ sheet resistance, denoted as [Formula: see text]. However, for materials sensitive to contamination or physical damage, contactless measurement is highly recommended if not required. Feasibility of [Formula: see text] evaluation using a one-port rectangular waveguide working on the microwave band in a contact-free mode is studied. Compared with existed waveguide methods, the proposed method has three advantages: first, by introducing an air gap between the waveguide flange and the sample surface, it is truly contactless; second, within the specified range of [Formula: see text] , the substrate’s effect may be neglected; third, it does not require a matched load and/or metallization at the sample backside. Both theoretical derivation and simulation showed that the magnitude of the reflection coefficient [Formula: see text] decreased monotonously with increasing [Formula: see text]. Through calibration, a quantitative correlation of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] was established. Experimental results with various conductive glasses showed that, for [Formula: see text] in the range of ~10 to 400 Ohm/sq, the estimation error of sheet resistance was below ~20%. The potential effects of air gap size, sample size/location and measurement uncertainty of [Formula: see text] are discussed. The proposed method is particularly suitable for characterization of conductive glass or related nanomaterials with [Formula: see text] in the range of tens or hundreds of Ohm/sq.