Cargando…

A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique

OBJECTIVE: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school’s key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures. METHODS: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salgado, Teresa M., Reynolds, Taylor N., Frankart, Laura M., Holdford, David A., Dipiro, Joseph T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294062
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120
_version_ 1783616137876996096
author Salgado, Teresa M.
Reynolds, Taylor N.
Frankart, Laura M.
Holdford, David A.
Dipiro, Joseph T.
author_facet Salgado, Teresa M.
Reynolds, Taylor N.
Frankart, Laura M.
Holdford, David A.
Dipiro, Joseph T.
author_sort Salgado, Teresa M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school’s key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures. METHODS: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked, nine of which were university mandated, divided into 10 modules: admissions, community outreach, continuing education, diversity, faculty experience and success, fundraising, graduate program, research and scholarship, staff experience and success, and student experience and success. Using a three-round Delphi consensus technique, KPIs were reviewed by faculty and staff. Each participant responded whether they considered each KPI to be essential or not essential for school quality assessment and improvement. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively. RESULTS: Of 109 faculty and staff invited, 49 participated in the first round, 51 in the second, and 42 in the third. At the end of the third round, accumulated consensus was achieved for 35 out of 88 (39.8%) KPIs that were considered essential and 3 out of 88 (3.4%) that were considered non-essential. Consensus percentage per module was: 15.4% (2/13) admissions, 28.6% (2/7) community outreach, 33.3% (3/9) continuing education, 27.3% (3/11) diversity, 62.5% (5/8) faculty experience and success, 55.6% (5/9) fundraising, 40% (4/10) graduate program, 33.3% (3/9) research and scholarship, 57.1% (4/7) staff experience and success, and 66.7% (4/6) student experience and success. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, 35 KPIs achieved consensus as essential to measure achievement of benchmarks for the school, which totals 44 KPIs, including nine university mandated KPIs. The process facilitated faculty and staff involvement in KPI selection and achieved improved focus for programmatic assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7699828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76998282020-12-07 A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique Salgado, Teresa M. Reynolds, Taylor N. Frankart, Laura M. Holdford, David A. Dipiro, Joseph T. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school’s key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures. METHODS: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked, nine of which were university mandated, divided into 10 modules: admissions, community outreach, continuing education, diversity, faculty experience and success, fundraising, graduate program, research and scholarship, staff experience and success, and student experience and success. Using a three-round Delphi consensus technique, KPIs were reviewed by faculty and staff. Each participant responded whether they considered each KPI to be essential or not essential for school quality assessment and improvement. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively. RESULTS: Of 109 faculty and staff invited, 49 participated in the first round, 51 in the second, and 42 in the third. At the end of the third round, accumulated consensus was achieved for 35 out of 88 (39.8%) KPIs that were considered essential and 3 out of 88 (3.4%) that were considered non-essential. Consensus percentage per module was: 15.4% (2/13) admissions, 28.6% (2/7) community outreach, 33.3% (3/9) continuing education, 27.3% (3/11) diversity, 62.5% (5/8) faculty experience and success, 55.6% (5/9) fundraising, 40% (4/10) graduate program, 33.3% (3/9) research and scholarship, 57.1% (4/7) staff experience and success, and 66.7% (4/6) student experience and success. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, 35 KPIs achieved consensus as essential to measure achievement of benchmarks for the school, which totals 44 KPIs, including nine university mandated KPIs. The process facilitated faculty and staff involvement in KPI selection and achieved improved focus for programmatic assessment. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2020 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7699828/ /pubmed/33294062 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice and the Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Salgado, Teresa M.
Reynolds, Taylor N.
Frankart, Laura M.
Holdford, David A.
Dipiro, Joseph T.
A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
title A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
title_full A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
title_fullStr A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
title_full_unstemmed A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
title_short A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
title_sort key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified delphi consensus technique
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294062
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120
work_keys_str_mv AT salgadoteresam akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT reynoldstaylorn akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT frankartlauram akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT holdforddavida akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT dipirojosepht akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT salgadoteresam keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT reynoldstaylorn keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT frankartlauram keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT holdforddavida keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT dipirojosepht keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique
AT keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique