Cargando…
A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique
OBJECTIVE: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school’s key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures. METHODS: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294062 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120 |
_version_ | 1783616137876996096 |
---|---|
author | Salgado, Teresa M. Reynolds, Taylor N. Frankart, Laura M. Holdford, David A. Dipiro, Joseph T. |
author_facet | Salgado, Teresa M. Reynolds, Taylor N. Frankart, Laura M. Holdford, David A. Dipiro, Joseph T. |
author_sort | Salgado, Teresa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school’s key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures. METHODS: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked, nine of which were university mandated, divided into 10 modules: admissions, community outreach, continuing education, diversity, faculty experience and success, fundraising, graduate program, research and scholarship, staff experience and success, and student experience and success. Using a three-round Delphi consensus technique, KPIs were reviewed by faculty and staff. Each participant responded whether they considered each KPI to be essential or not essential for school quality assessment and improvement. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively. RESULTS: Of 109 faculty and staff invited, 49 participated in the first round, 51 in the second, and 42 in the third. At the end of the third round, accumulated consensus was achieved for 35 out of 88 (39.8%) KPIs that were considered essential and 3 out of 88 (3.4%) that were considered non-essential. Consensus percentage per module was: 15.4% (2/13) admissions, 28.6% (2/7) community outreach, 33.3% (3/9) continuing education, 27.3% (3/11) diversity, 62.5% (5/8) faculty experience and success, 55.6% (5/9) fundraising, 40% (4/10) graduate program, 33.3% (3/9) research and scholarship, 57.1% (4/7) staff experience and success, and 66.7% (4/6) student experience and success. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, 35 KPIs achieved consensus as essential to measure achievement of benchmarks for the school, which totals 44 KPIs, including nine university mandated KPIs. The process facilitated faculty and staff involvement in KPI selection and achieved improved focus for programmatic assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7699828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76998282020-12-07 A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique Salgado, Teresa M. Reynolds, Taylor N. Frankart, Laura M. Holdford, David A. Dipiro, Joseph T. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school’s key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures. METHODS: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked, nine of which were university mandated, divided into 10 modules: admissions, community outreach, continuing education, diversity, faculty experience and success, fundraising, graduate program, research and scholarship, staff experience and success, and student experience and success. Using a three-round Delphi consensus technique, KPIs were reviewed by faculty and staff. Each participant responded whether they considered each KPI to be essential or not essential for school quality assessment and improvement. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively. RESULTS: Of 109 faculty and staff invited, 49 participated in the first round, 51 in the second, and 42 in the third. At the end of the third round, accumulated consensus was achieved for 35 out of 88 (39.8%) KPIs that were considered essential and 3 out of 88 (3.4%) that were considered non-essential. Consensus percentage per module was: 15.4% (2/13) admissions, 28.6% (2/7) community outreach, 33.3% (3/9) continuing education, 27.3% (3/11) diversity, 62.5% (5/8) faculty experience and success, 55.6% (5/9) fundraising, 40% (4/10) graduate program, 33.3% (3/9) research and scholarship, 57.1% (4/7) staff experience and success, and 66.7% (4/6) student experience and success. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, 35 KPIs achieved consensus as essential to measure achievement of benchmarks for the school, which totals 44 KPIs, including nine university mandated KPIs. The process facilitated faculty and staff involvement in KPI selection and achieved improved focus for programmatic assessment. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2020 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7699828/ /pubmed/33294062 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice and the Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Salgado, Teresa M. Reynolds, Taylor N. Frankart, Laura M. Holdford, David A. Dipiro, Joseph T. A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique |
title | A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique |
title_full | A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique |
title_fullStr | A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique |
title_full_unstemmed | A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique |
title_short | A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique |
title_sort | key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified delphi consensus technique |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294062 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salgadoteresam akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT reynoldstaylorn akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT frankartlauram akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT holdforddavida akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT dipirojosepht akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT akeyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT salgadoteresam keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT reynoldstaylorn keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT frankartlauram keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT holdforddavida keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT dipirojosepht keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique AT keyperformanceindicatorsredefinitioninitiativeataschoolofpharmacyusingamodifieddelphiconsensustechnique |