Cargando…

Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country

BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of education, many academic medical institutions are investing in the application of blended education to support new teaching and learning methods. To take necessary measures to implement the blended learning smoothly, and to achieve its goals, we aimed to identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jebraeily, Mohamad, Pirnejad, Habibollah, Feizi, Aram, Niazkhani, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02388-8
_version_ 1783616653908508672
author Jebraeily, Mohamad
Pirnejad, Habibollah
Feizi, Aram
Niazkhani, Zahra
author_facet Jebraeily, Mohamad
Pirnejad, Habibollah
Feizi, Aram
Niazkhani, Zahra
author_sort Jebraeily, Mohamad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of education, many academic medical institutions are investing in the application of blended education to support new teaching and learning methods. To take necessary measures to implement the blended learning smoothly, and to achieve its goals, we aimed to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) from its key users’ viewpoints. METHODS: A qualitative study consisting of 24 interviews with lecturers and students and document analysis was conducted at Urmia University of Medical Sciences, in Iran, in 2018. The SWOT framework was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The most important strengths were the promotion of lecturer-student interactions, the focus on students’ learning needs and self-learning, and problem-solving skills. The supports of university executives, alignment with the national health education transformation plan, and access to the shared infrastructures of the national virtual medical science university were opportunities to facilitate its implementation. However, this endeavor had weaknesses such as bottlenecks in technical, organizational, and human resource infrastructures and lack of culture readiness. The threats envisioned for its maintenance were its dependency on the education transformation plan and the lack of an independent e-learning center for better planning and support services, lack of proper evaluation and supervision of virtual activities, and insufficiency of the privileges considered for users. CONCLUSIONS: One of the important implications of this study is that different aspects surrounding blended learning might work as a double-edge sword from time to time, which requires a thorough overview. While retaining the strengths and enjoying the opportunities in such interventions, the weaknesses should be recognized and threats are faced and addressed. Therefore, if the SWOT items are considered mindfully, they can help to adopt the right implementation strategies to reap full benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7703509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77035092020-12-01 Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country Jebraeily, Mohamad Pirnejad, Habibollah Feizi, Aram Niazkhani, Zahra BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of education, many academic medical institutions are investing in the application of blended education to support new teaching and learning methods. To take necessary measures to implement the blended learning smoothly, and to achieve its goals, we aimed to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) from its key users’ viewpoints. METHODS: A qualitative study consisting of 24 interviews with lecturers and students and document analysis was conducted at Urmia University of Medical Sciences, in Iran, in 2018. The SWOT framework was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The most important strengths were the promotion of lecturer-student interactions, the focus on students’ learning needs and self-learning, and problem-solving skills. The supports of university executives, alignment with the national health education transformation plan, and access to the shared infrastructures of the national virtual medical science university were opportunities to facilitate its implementation. However, this endeavor had weaknesses such as bottlenecks in technical, organizational, and human resource infrastructures and lack of culture readiness. The threats envisioned for its maintenance were its dependency on the education transformation plan and the lack of an independent e-learning center for better planning and support services, lack of proper evaluation and supervision of virtual activities, and insufficiency of the privileges considered for users. CONCLUSIONS: One of the important implications of this study is that different aspects surrounding blended learning might work as a double-edge sword from time to time, which requires a thorough overview. While retaining the strengths and enjoying the opportunities in such interventions, the weaknesses should be recognized and threats are faced and addressed. Therefore, if the SWOT items are considered mindfully, they can help to adopt the right implementation strategies to reap full benefits. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7703509/ /pubmed/33256714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02388-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jebraeily, Mohamad
Pirnejad, Habibollah
Feizi, Aram
Niazkhani, Zahra
Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
title Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
title_full Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
title_fullStr Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
title_short Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
title_sort evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: a qualitative study in a developing country
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02388-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jebraeilymohamad evaluationofblendedmedicaleducationfromlecturersandstudentsviewpointaqualitativestudyinadevelopingcountry
AT pirnejadhabibollah evaluationofblendedmedicaleducationfromlecturersandstudentsviewpointaqualitativestudyinadevelopingcountry
AT feiziaram evaluationofblendedmedicaleducationfromlecturersandstudentsviewpointaqualitativestudyinadevelopingcountry
AT niazkhanizahra evaluationofblendedmedicaleducationfromlecturersandstudentsviewpointaqualitativestudyinadevelopingcountry