Cargando…

Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a pectin biofilm on the preservation of refrigerated and unrefrigerated eggs during 5 wk of storage based on egg weight loss, albumen height, Haugh unit (HU), and the yolk index (YI). A total of 1,200 nonfertile eggs from GLK Bankiva laying hens (40 wk of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da S. Oliveira, Gabriel, dos Santos, Vinícius M., Rodrigues, Jullyana C., Santana, Ângela P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.057
_version_ 1783616881691721728
author da S. Oliveira, Gabriel
dos Santos, Vinícius M.
Rodrigues, Jullyana C.
Santana, Ângela P.
author_facet da S. Oliveira, Gabriel
dos Santos, Vinícius M.
Rodrigues, Jullyana C.
Santana, Ângela P.
author_sort da S. Oliveira, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a pectin biofilm on the preservation of refrigerated and unrefrigerated eggs during 5 wk of storage based on egg weight loss, albumen height, Haugh unit (HU), and the yolk index (YI). A total of 1,200 nonfertile eggs from GLK Bankiva laying hens (40 wk of age), which were freshly laid and came from a single collection, were obtained from a model poultry rearing system (Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil) that meets all animal welfare criteria. The experimental outline was entirely randomized, with 20 treatments in a factorial scheme of 2 × 2 × 5, with 2 biofilm treatments (with and without) × 2 storage temperatures (refrigeration: 5°C and ambient: 25°C) × 5 storage periods (7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d), with 12 repetitions per treatment. Starting from the third storage week, increased weight loss (%) was observed in noncoated eggs (4.46 ± 1.06; 5.61 ± 1.37; 6.93 ± 1.66%) compared with biofilm-coated eggs (3.57 ± 1.26; 4.74 ± 1.8; 6.05 ± 2.21%), respectively. The HU variation in the pectin-coated eggs (86.84–78.02) was smaller than that in the noncoated eggs (83.01–64.36) between the beginning (7 d) and the end (35 d) of the experimental period. Eggs with and without biofilm stored in the refrigerator presented average HU values of 91.26 ± 6.27 and 88.35 ± 6.96, respectively. In contrast, when kept at room temperature, eggs with the coating presented higher HU values (71.27 ± 10.78) than eggs without the coating (59.11 ± 15.97). Coated eggs (0.37 ± 0.16) showed higher YI values than noncoated eggs (0.35 ± 0.16). A pectin-based biofilm effectively maintained egg quality during the 35 d of storage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7705044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77050442020-12-08 Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating da S. Oliveira, Gabriel dos Santos, Vinícius M. Rodrigues, Jullyana C. Santana, Ângela P. Poult Sci Processing and Products This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a pectin biofilm on the preservation of refrigerated and unrefrigerated eggs during 5 wk of storage based on egg weight loss, albumen height, Haugh unit (HU), and the yolk index (YI). A total of 1,200 nonfertile eggs from GLK Bankiva laying hens (40 wk of age), which were freshly laid and came from a single collection, were obtained from a model poultry rearing system (Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil) that meets all animal welfare criteria. The experimental outline was entirely randomized, with 20 treatments in a factorial scheme of 2 × 2 × 5, with 2 biofilm treatments (with and without) × 2 storage temperatures (refrigeration: 5°C and ambient: 25°C) × 5 storage periods (7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d), with 12 repetitions per treatment. Starting from the third storage week, increased weight loss (%) was observed in noncoated eggs (4.46 ± 1.06; 5.61 ± 1.37; 6.93 ± 1.66%) compared with biofilm-coated eggs (3.57 ± 1.26; 4.74 ± 1.8; 6.05 ± 2.21%), respectively. The HU variation in the pectin-coated eggs (86.84–78.02) was smaller than that in the noncoated eggs (83.01–64.36) between the beginning (7 d) and the end (35 d) of the experimental period. Eggs with and without biofilm stored in the refrigerator presented average HU values of 91.26 ± 6.27 and 88.35 ± 6.96, respectively. In contrast, when kept at room temperature, eggs with the coating presented higher HU values (71.27 ± 10.78) than eggs without the coating (59.11 ± 15.97). Coated eggs (0.37 ± 0.16) showed higher YI values than noncoated eggs (0.35 ± 0.16). A pectin-based biofilm effectively maintained egg quality during the 35 d of storage. Elsevier 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7705044/ /pubmed/33248638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.057 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Processing and Products
da S. Oliveira, Gabriel
dos Santos, Vinícius M.
Rodrigues, Jullyana C.
Santana, Ângela P.
Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
title Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
title_full Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
title_fullStr Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
title_full_unstemmed Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
title_short Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
title_sort conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating
topic Processing and Products
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7705044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.057
work_keys_str_mv AT dasoliveiragabriel conservationoftheinternalqualityofeggsusingabiodegradablecoating
AT dossantosviniciusm conservationoftheinternalqualityofeggsusingabiodegradablecoating
AT rodriguesjullyanac conservationoftheinternalqualityofeggsusingabiodegradablecoating
AT santanaangelap conservationoftheinternalqualityofeggsusingabiodegradablecoating