Cargando…
INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels
Advances in genome editing technologies have enabled manipulation of genomes at the single base level. These technologies are based on programmable nucleases (PNs) that include meganucleases, zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and Clustered Regular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa975 |
_version_ | 1783617486077296640 |
---|---|
author | Bennett, Eric Paul Petersen, Bent Larsen Johansen, Ida Elisabeth Niu, Yiyuan Yang, Zhang Chamberlain, Christopher Aled Met, Özcan Wandall, Hans H Frödin, Morten |
author_facet | Bennett, Eric Paul Petersen, Bent Larsen Johansen, Ida Elisabeth Niu, Yiyuan Yang, Zhang Chamberlain, Christopher Aled Met, Özcan Wandall, Hans H Frödin, Morten |
author_sort | Bennett, Eric Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advances in genome editing technologies have enabled manipulation of genomes at the single base level. These technologies are based on programmable nucleases (PNs) that include meganucleases, zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) nucleases and have given researchers the ability to delete, insert or replace genomic DNA in cells, tissues and whole organisms. The great flexibility in re-designing the genomic target specificity of PNs has vastly expanded the scope of gene editing applications in life science, and shows great promise for development of the next generation gene therapies. PN technologies share the principle of inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) at a user-specified site in the genome, followed by cellular repair of the induced DSB. PN-elicited DSBs are mainly repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and the microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) pathways, which can elicit a variety of small insertion or deletion (indel) mutations. If indels are elicited in a protein coding sequence and shift the reading frame, targeted gene knock out (KO) can readily be achieved using either of the available PNs. Despite the ease by which gene inactivation in principle can be achieved, in practice, successful KO is not only determined by the efficiency of NHEJ and MMEJ repair; it also depends on the design and properties of the PN utilized, delivery format chosen, the preferred indel repair outcomes at the targeted site, the chromatin state of the target site and the relative activities of the repair pathways in the edited cells. These variables preclude accurate prediction of the nature and frequency of PN induced indels. A key step of any gene KO experiment therefore becomes the detection, characterization and quantification of the indel(s) induced at the targeted genomic site in cells, tissues or whole organisms. In this survey, we briefly review naturally occurring indels and their detection. Next, we review the methods that have been developed for detection of PN-induced indels. We briefly outline the experimental steps and describe the pros and cons of the various methods to help users decide a suitable method for their editing application. We highlight recent advances that enable accurate and sensitive quantification of indel events in cells regardless of their genome complexity, turning a complex pool of different indel events into informative indel profiles. Finally, we review what has been learned about PN-elicited indel formation through the use of the new methods and how this insight is helping to further advance the genome editing field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7708060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77080602020-12-07 INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels Bennett, Eric Paul Petersen, Bent Larsen Johansen, Ida Elisabeth Niu, Yiyuan Yang, Zhang Chamberlain, Christopher Aled Met, Özcan Wandall, Hans H Frödin, Morten Nucleic Acids Res Survey and Summary Advances in genome editing technologies have enabled manipulation of genomes at the single base level. These technologies are based on programmable nucleases (PNs) that include meganucleases, zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) nucleases and have given researchers the ability to delete, insert or replace genomic DNA in cells, tissues and whole organisms. The great flexibility in re-designing the genomic target specificity of PNs has vastly expanded the scope of gene editing applications in life science, and shows great promise for development of the next generation gene therapies. PN technologies share the principle of inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) at a user-specified site in the genome, followed by cellular repair of the induced DSB. PN-elicited DSBs are mainly repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and the microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) pathways, which can elicit a variety of small insertion or deletion (indel) mutations. If indels are elicited in a protein coding sequence and shift the reading frame, targeted gene knock out (KO) can readily be achieved using either of the available PNs. Despite the ease by which gene inactivation in principle can be achieved, in practice, successful KO is not only determined by the efficiency of NHEJ and MMEJ repair; it also depends on the design and properties of the PN utilized, delivery format chosen, the preferred indel repair outcomes at the targeted site, the chromatin state of the target site and the relative activities of the repair pathways in the edited cells. These variables preclude accurate prediction of the nature and frequency of PN induced indels. A key step of any gene KO experiment therefore becomes the detection, characterization and quantification of the indel(s) induced at the targeted genomic site in cells, tissues or whole organisms. In this survey, we briefly review naturally occurring indels and their detection. Next, we review the methods that have been developed for detection of PN-induced indels. We briefly outline the experimental steps and describe the pros and cons of the various methods to help users decide a suitable method for their editing application. We highlight recent advances that enable accurate and sensitive quantification of indel events in cells regardless of their genome complexity, turning a complex pool of different indel events into informative indel profiles. Finally, we review what has been learned about PN-elicited indel formation through the use of the new methods and how this insight is helping to further advance the genome editing field. Oxford University Press 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7708060/ /pubmed/33170255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa975 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Survey and Summary Bennett, Eric Paul Petersen, Bent Larsen Johansen, Ida Elisabeth Niu, Yiyuan Yang, Zhang Chamberlain, Christopher Aled Met, Özcan Wandall, Hans H Frödin, Morten INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
title | INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
title_full | INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
title_fullStr | INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
title_full_unstemmed | INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
title_short | INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
title_sort | indel detection, the ‘achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels |
topic | Survey and Summary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennettericpaul indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT petersenbentlarsen indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT johansenidaelisabeth indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT niuyiyuan indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT yangzhang indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT chamberlainchristopheraled indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT metozcan indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT wandallhansh indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels AT frodinmorten indeldetectiontheachillesheelofprecisegenomeeditingasurveyofmethodsforaccurateprofilingofgeneeditinginducedindels |