Cargando…
Do penalty-based pay-for-performance programs improve surgical care more effectively than other payment strategies? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review is to assess if penalty-based pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are more effective in improving quality and cost outcomes compared to two other payment strategies (i.e., rewards and a combination of rewards and penalties) for surgical care in the United...
Autores principales: | Kim, Kyung Mi, Max, Wendy, White, Justin S., Chapman, Susan A., Muench, Ulrike |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.060 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes Following Implementation of a Medicare Pay-for-Performance Program for Surgical Procedures
por: Kim, Kyung Mi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Penalties for Non-Payment of Arrears
Publicado: (1914) -
Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica’s PES Program
por: Arriagada, R. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Payment of Contributions in Currencies other than the Swiss Franc
Publicado: (2011) -
Correction: Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program
por: Arriagada, R. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)