“Vicarious thinking” was a key driver of score change in Delphi surveys for COS development and is facilitated by feedback of results

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this nested study were to (1) assess whether changes in scores between rounds altered the final degree of consensus achieved in three Delphi surveys conducted as part of COS development projects (anal, gastric, and prostate cancer), and (2) explore participants’ reasons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fish, Rebecca, MacLennan, Steven, Alkhaffaf, Bilal, Williamson, Paula R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.028

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.028

Ejemplares similares