Cargando…

Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years

PROBLEM: Opportunities for self-directed learning were missing from our medical school curriculum in general and on our radiology electives specifically. Our objective was to explore the feasibility and benefits of using medical students in the development of our student-created teaching files. APPR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bozung, Bryan R., Houston, Kaiulani, Lilly, John F., Jordan, Sheryl G., Fordham, Lynn A., Beck Dallaghan, Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33250037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1843356
_version_ 1783619370736418816
author Bozung, Bryan R.
Houston, Kaiulani
Lilly, John F.
Jordan, Sheryl G.
Fordham, Lynn A.
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
author_facet Bozung, Bryan R.
Houston, Kaiulani
Lilly, John F.
Jordan, Sheryl G.
Fordham, Lynn A.
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
author_sort Bozung, Bryan R.
collection PubMed
description PROBLEM: Opportunities for self-directed learning were missing from our medical school curriculum in general and on our radiology electives specifically. Our objective was to explore the feasibility and benefits of using medical students in the development of our student-created teaching files. APPROACH: In 2018, a website was developed at our institution to support medical student radiology education and create a repository for the online publication of student-developed teaching cases. Students participating in radiology clerkships at our institution had an opportunity to submit case presentations for publication to our online teaching file following peer review. The medical students participated in the peer review process facilitated by the faculty director of radiology undergraduate medical education. The faculty member oversaw the training of new student editors and the development of a peer review guide. OUTCOMES: The peer review guide included goals of the teaching file project and direction regarding the peer review process. Student editors were trained using the peer review guide in conjunction with individual meetings with the faculty mentor. At twenty-four months, 82 student-developed cases had been published to the online teaching file following medical student peer review. The teaching file had garnered 3884 page views. NEXT STEPS: The medical student-led peer review process meets core competencies in self-directed learning. The authors plan to explore the application of peer-assisted learning theories to the editing and peer-review process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77177842021-01-01 Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years Bozung, Bryan R. Houston, Kaiulani Lilly, John F. Jordan, Sheryl G. Fordham, Lynn A. Beck Dallaghan, Gary Med Educ Online Research Article PROBLEM: Opportunities for self-directed learning were missing from our medical school curriculum in general and on our radiology electives specifically. Our objective was to explore the feasibility and benefits of using medical students in the development of our student-created teaching files. APPROACH: In 2018, a website was developed at our institution to support medical student radiology education and create a repository for the online publication of student-developed teaching cases. Students participating in radiology clerkships at our institution had an opportunity to submit case presentations for publication to our online teaching file following peer review. The medical students participated in the peer review process facilitated by the faculty director of radiology undergraduate medical education. The faculty member oversaw the training of new student editors and the development of a peer review guide. OUTCOMES: The peer review guide included goals of the teaching file project and direction regarding the peer review process. Student editors were trained using the peer review guide in conjunction with individual meetings with the faculty mentor. At twenty-four months, 82 student-developed cases had been published to the online teaching file following medical student peer review. The teaching file had garnered 3884 page views. NEXT STEPS: The medical student-led peer review process meets core competencies in self-directed learning. The authors plan to explore the application of peer-assisted learning theories to the editing and peer-review process. Taylor & Francis 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7717784/ /pubmed/33250037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1843356 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bozung, Bryan R.
Houston, Kaiulani
Lilly, John F.
Jordan, Sheryl G.
Fordham, Lynn A.
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
title Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
title_full Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
title_fullStr Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
title_full_unstemmed Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
title_short Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
title_sort student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33250037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1843356
work_keys_str_mv AT bozungbryanr studentledpeerreviewofanonlineteachingfileperspectivesafter2years
AT houstonkaiulani studentledpeerreviewofanonlineteachingfileperspectivesafter2years
AT lillyjohnf studentledpeerreviewofanonlineteachingfileperspectivesafter2years
AT jordansherylg studentledpeerreviewofanonlineteachingfileperspectivesafter2years
AT fordhamlynna studentledpeerreviewofanonlineteachingfileperspectivesafter2years
AT beckdallaghangary studentledpeerreviewofanonlineteachingfileperspectivesafter2years