Cargando…
A systematic review of the “promising zone” design
INTRODUCTION: Sample size calculations require assumptions regarding treatment response and variability. Incorrect assumptions can result in under- or overpowered trials, posing ethical concerns. Sample size re-estimation (SSR) methods investigate the validity of these assumptions and increase the s...
Autores principales: | Edwards, Julia M., Walters, Stephen J., Kunz, Cornelia, Julious, Steven A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7718653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04931-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
A retrospective analysis of conditional power assumptions in clinical trials with continuous or binary endpoints
por: Edwards, Julia M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Design considerations and analysis planning of a phase 2a proof of concept study in rheumatoid arthritis in the presence of possible non-monotonicity
por: Liu, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Optimal promising zone designs
por: Hsiao, Samuel T., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Are pilot trials useful for predicting randomisation and attrition rates in definitive studies: A review of publicly funded trials
por: Cooper, Cindy L, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
An investigation of the constancy of effect in Cochrane systematic reviews in context with the assumptions for noninferiority trials
por: Duro, Enass M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)