A systematic evaluation of the design and context dependencies of massively parallel reporter assays

Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) functionally screen thousands of sequences for regulatory activity in parallel. To date, there has been no systematic comparison of differences in MPRA design. Here, we screen a library of 2,440 candidate liver enhancers and controls for regulatory activity in HepG2 cells using nine different MPRA designs. We identify subtle but significant differences that correlate with epigenetic and sequence-level features, as well as differences in dynamic range and reproducibility. We also validate en masse that enhancer activity is robustly independent of orientation, at least for our library and designs. Finally, with a new method, we assemble and test the same enhancers as 192-mers, 354-mers, and 678-mers, and observe surprisingly large differences. This work provides a framework for the experimental design of high-throughput reporter assays, suggesting that the extended sequence context of tested elements, and to a lesser degree the precise assay, influence MPRA results.