Cargando…
A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition
Efficient S phase entry is essential for development, tissue repair, and immune defences. However, hyperactive or expedited S phase entry causes replication stress, DNA damage and oncogenesis, highlighting the need for strict regulation. Recent paradigm shifts and conflicting reports demonstrate the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1002 |
_version_ | 1783622842305216512 |
---|---|
author | Hume, Samuel Dianov, Grigory L Ramadan, Kristijan |
author_facet | Hume, Samuel Dianov, Grigory L Ramadan, Kristijan |
author_sort | Hume, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Efficient S phase entry is essential for development, tissue repair, and immune defences. However, hyperactive or expedited S phase entry causes replication stress, DNA damage and oncogenesis, highlighting the need for strict regulation. Recent paradigm shifts and conflicting reports demonstrate the requirement for a discussion of the G1/S transition literature. Here, we review the recent studies, and propose a unified model for the S phase entry decision. In this model, competition between mitogen and DNA damage signalling over the course of the mother cell cycle constitutes the predominant control mechanism for S phase entry of daughter cells. Mitogens and DNA damage have distinct sensing periods, giving rise to three Commitment Points for S phase entry (CP1-3). S phase entry is mitogen-independent in the daughter G1 phase, but remains sensitive to DNA damage, such as single strand breaks, the most frequently-occurring lesions that uniquely threaten DNA replication. To control CP1-3, dedicated hubs integrate the antagonistic mitogenic and DNA damage signals, regulating the stoichiometric cyclin: CDK inhibitor ratio for ultrasensitive control of CDK4/6 and CDK2. This unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition combines the findings of decades of study, and provides an updated foundation for cell cycle research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7736809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77368092020-12-17 A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition Hume, Samuel Dianov, Grigory L Ramadan, Kristijan Nucleic Acids Res Survey and Summary Efficient S phase entry is essential for development, tissue repair, and immune defences. However, hyperactive or expedited S phase entry causes replication stress, DNA damage and oncogenesis, highlighting the need for strict regulation. Recent paradigm shifts and conflicting reports demonstrate the requirement for a discussion of the G1/S transition literature. Here, we review the recent studies, and propose a unified model for the S phase entry decision. In this model, competition between mitogen and DNA damage signalling over the course of the mother cell cycle constitutes the predominant control mechanism for S phase entry of daughter cells. Mitogens and DNA damage have distinct sensing periods, giving rise to three Commitment Points for S phase entry (CP1-3). S phase entry is mitogen-independent in the daughter G1 phase, but remains sensitive to DNA damage, such as single strand breaks, the most frequently-occurring lesions that uniquely threaten DNA replication. To control CP1-3, dedicated hubs integrate the antagonistic mitogenic and DNA damage signals, regulating the stoichiometric cyclin: CDK inhibitor ratio for ultrasensitive control of CDK4/6 and CDK2. This unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition combines the findings of decades of study, and provides an updated foundation for cell cycle research. Oxford University Press 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7736809/ /pubmed/33166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1002 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Survey and Summary Hume, Samuel Dianov, Grigory L Ramadan, Kristijan A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition |
title | A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition |
title_full | A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition |
title_fullStr | A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition |
title_full_unstemmed | A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition |
title_short | A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition |
title_sort | unified model for the g1/s cell cycle transition |
topic | Survey and Summary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT humesamuel aunifiedmodelfortheg1scellcycletransition AT dianovgrigoryl aunifiedmodelfortheg1scellcycletransition AT ramadankristijan aunifiedmodelfortheg1scellcycletransition AT humesamuel unifiedmodelfortheg1scellcycletransition AT dianovgrigoryl unifiedmodelfortheg1scellcycletransition AT ramadankristijan unifiedmodelfortheg1scellcycletransition |