Cargando…

Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study

Background: Variable intensity training (VIT) characteristic of stop-and-go team sport exercise may reduce performance capacity when performed on successive days but also represent a strategy to induce rapid training-induced increases in exercise capacity. Although post-exercise protein enhances mus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hannaian, Sarkis J., Orlando, Mark N., Abou Sawan, Sidney, Mazzulla, Michael, West, Daniel W. D., Moore, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.568740
_version_ 1783623365051809792
author Hannaian, Sarkis J.
Orlando, Mark N.
Abou Sawan, Sidney
Mazzulla, Michael
West, Daniel W. D.
Moore, Daniel R.
author_facet Hannaian, Sarkis J.
Orlando, Mark N.
Abou Sawan, Sidney
Mazzulla, Michael
West, Daniel W. D.
Moore, Daniel R.
author_sort Hannaian, Sarkis J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Variable intensity training (VIT) characteristic of stop-and-go team sport exercise may reduce performance capacity when performed on successive days but also represent a strategy to induce rapid training-induced increases in exercise capacity. Although post-exercise protein enhances muscle protein synthesis, the timing of protein ingestion following variable intensity training (VIT) on next-day recovery and short-term performance adaptation is unknown. Purpose: To determine if immediate (IMM) as compared to delayed (DEL) protein ingestion supports greater acute recovery of exercise performance during successive days of VIT and/or supports chronic training adaptations. Methods: Sixteen habitually active men performed 5 consecutive days of variable intensity training (VIT) in the evening prior to consuming a beverage providing carbohydrate and whey protein (IMM; 0.7 g and 0.3 g/kg, respectively) or carbohydrates alone (DEL; 1 g/kg) with the reciprocal beverage consumed the following morning. Performance was assessed before each VIT (recovery) and 2 days after the final VIT (adaptation). Results: Five consecutive days of VIT progressively decreased anaerobic peak power (~7%) and muscle strength (MVC; ~8%) with no impact of protein timing. Following 2 days of recovery, VIT increased maximal voluntary contraction and predicted VO(2peak) by ~10 and ~5%, respectively, with a moderate beneficial effect of IMM on predicted VO(2peak) (ES = 0.78). Conclusion: Successive days of simulated team sport exercise decreases markers of next-day performance capacity with no effect of protein timing on acute recovery. However, practical VIT increases muscle strength and aerobic capacity in as little as 5 days with the latter potentially enhanced by immediate post-exercise protein consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77396392020-12-17 Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study Hannaian, Sarkis J. Orlando, Mark N. Abou Sawan, Sidney Mazzulla, Michael West, Daniel W. D. Moore, Daniel R. Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Background: Variable intensity training (VIT) characteristic of stop-and-go team sport exercise may reduce performance capacity when performed on successive days but also represent a strategy to induce rapid training-induced increases in exercise capacity. Although post-exercise protein enhances muscle protein synthesis, the timing of protein ingestion following variable intensity training (VIT) on next-day recovery and short-term performance adaptation is unknown. Purpose: To determine if immediate (IMM) as compared to delayed (DEL) protein ingestion supports greater acute recovery of exercise performance during successive days of VIT and/or supports chronic training adaptations. Methods: Sixteen habitually active men performed 5 consecutive days of variable intensity training (VIT) in the evening prior to consuming a beverage providing carbohydrate and whey protein (IMM; 0.7 g and 0.3 g/kg, respectively) or carbohydrates alone (DEL; 1 g/kg) with the reciprocal beverage consumed the following morning. Performance was assessed before each VIT (recovery) and 2 days after the final VIT (adaptation). Results: Five consecutive days of VIT progressively decreased anaerobic peak power (~7%) and muscle strength (MVC; ~8%) with no impact of protein timing. Following 2 days of recovery, VIT increased maximal voluntary contraction and predicted VO(2peak) by ~10 and ~5%, respectively, with a moderate beneficial effect of IMM on predicted VO(2peak) (ES = 0.78). Conclusion: Successive days of simulated team sport exercise decreases markers of next-day performance capacity with no effect of protein timing on acute recovery. However, practical VIT increases muscle strength and aerobic capacity in as little as 5 days with the latter potentially enhanced by immediate post-exercise protein consumption. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7739639/ /pubmed/33345126 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.568740 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hannaian, Orlando, Abou Sawan, Mazzulla, West and Moore. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Hannaian, Sarkis J.
Orlando, Mark N.
Abou Sawan, Sidney
Mazzulla, Michael
West, Daniel W. D.
Moore, Daniel R.
Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study
title Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study
title_full Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study
title_short Protein Timing Does Not Affect Next-Day Recovery of Strength or Power but May Enhance Aerobic Adaptations to Short-Term Variable Intensity Exercise Training in Recreationally Active Males: A Pilot Study
title_sort protein timing does not affect next-day recovery of strength or power but may enhance aerobic adaptations to short-term variable intensity exercise training in recreationally active males: a pilot study
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345126
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.568740
work_keys_str_mv AT hannaiansarkisj proteintimingdoesnotaffectnextdayrecoveryofstrengthorpowerbutmayenhanceaerobicadaptationstoshorttermvariableintensityexercisetraininginrecreationallyactivemalesapilotstudy
AT orlandomarkn proteintimingdoesnotaffectnextdayrecoveryofstrengthorpowerbutmayenhanceaerobicadaptationstoshorttermvariableintensityexercisetraininginrecreationallyactivemalesapilotstudy
AT abousawansidney proteintimingdoesnotaffectnextdayrecoveryofstrengthorpowerbutmayenhanceaerobicadaptationstoshorttermvariableintensityexercisetraininginrecreationallyactivemalesapilotstudy
AT mazzullamichael proteintimingdoesnotaffectnextdayrecoveryofstrengthorpowerbutmayenhanceaerobicadaptationstoshorttermvariableintensityexercisetraininginrecreationallyactivemalesapilotstudy
AT westdanielwd proteintimingdoesnotaffectnextdayrecoveryofstrengthorpowerbutmayenhanceaerobicadaptationstoshorttermvariableintensityexercisetraininginrecreationallyactivemalesapilotstudy
AT mooredanielr proteintimingdoesnotaffectnextdayrecoveryofstrengthorpowerbutmayenhanceaerobicadaptationstoshorttermvariableintensityexercisetraininginrecreationallyactivemalesapilotstudy