Cargando…
Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial
BACKGROUND: Cost-effective methods to facilitate practical medical education are in high demand and the “mixed-reality” (MR) technology seems suitable to provide students with instructions when learning a new practical task. To evaluate a step-by-step mixed reality (MR) guidance system for instructi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02450-5 |
_version_ | 1783624619489492992 |
---|---|
author | Schoeb, D. S. Schwarz, J. Hein, S. Schlager, D. Pohlmann, P. F. Frankenschmidt, A. Gratzke, C. Miernik, A. |
author_facet | Schoeb, D. S. Schwarz, J. Hein, S. Schlager, D. Pohlmann, P. F. Frankenschmidt, A. Gratzke, C. Miernik, A. |
author_sort | Schoeb, D. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cost-effective methods to facilitate practical medical education are in high demand and the “mixed-reality” (MR) technology seems suitable to provide students with instructions when learning a new practical task. To evaluate a step-by-step mixed reality (MR) guidance system for instructing a practical medical procedure, we conducted a randomized, single-blinded prospective trial on medical students learning bladder catheter placement. METHODS: We enrolled 164 medical students. Students were randomized into 2 groups and received instructions on how to perform bladder catheter placement on a male catheterization training model. One group (107 students) were given their instructions by an instructor, while the other group (57 students) were instructed via an MR guidance system using a Microsoft HoloLens. Both groups did hands on training. A standardized questionnaire covering previous knowledge, interest in modern technologies and a self-evaluation was filled out. In addition, students were asked to evaluate the system’s usability. We assessed both groups’s learning outcome via a standardized OSCE (objective structured clinical examination). RESULTS: Our evaluation of the learning outcome revealed an average point value of 19.96 ± 2,42 for the control group and 21.49 ± 2.27 for the MR group - the MR group’s result was significantly better (p = 0.00). The self-evaluations revealed no difference between groups, however, the control group gave higher ratings when evaluating the quality of instructions. The MR system’s assessment showed less usability, with a cumulative SUS (system usability scale) score of 56.6 (lower half) as well as a cumulative score of 24.2 ± 7.3 (n = 52) out of 100 in the NASA task load index. CONCLUSIONS: MR is a promising tool for instructing practical skills, and has the potential to enable superior learning outcomes. Advances in MR technology are necessary to improve the usability of current systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register ID: DRKS00013186 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7745503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77455032020-12-18 Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial Schoeb, D. S. Schwarz, J. Hein, S. Schlager, D. Pohlmann, P. F. Frankenschmidt, A. Gratzke, C. Miernik, A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Cost-effective methods to facilitate practical medical education are in high demand and the “mixed-reality” (MR) technology seems suitable to provide students with instructions when learning a new practical task. To evaluate a step-by-step mixed reality (MR) guidance system for instructing a practical medical procedure, we conducted a randomized, single-blinded prospective trial on medical students learning bladder catheter placement. METHODS: We enrolled 164 medical students. Students were randomized into 2 groups and received instructions on how to perform bladder catheter placement on a male catheterization training model. One group (107 students) were given their instructions by an instructor, while the other group (57 students) were instructed via an MR guidance system using a Microsoft HoloLens. Both groups did hands on training. A standardized questionnaire covering previous knowledge, interest in modern technologies and a self-evaluation was filled out. In addition, students were asked to evaluate the system’s usability. We assessed both groups’s learning outcome via a standardized OSCE (objective structured clinical examination). RESULTS: Our evaluation of the learning outcome revealed an average point value of 19.96 ± 2,42 for the control group and 21.49 ± 2.27 for the MR group - the MR group’s result was significantly better (p = 0.00). The self-evaluations revealed no difference between groups, however, the control group gave higher ratings when evaluating the quality of instructions. The MR system’s assessment showed less usability, with a cumulative SUS (system usability scale) score of 56.6 (lower half) as well as a cumulative score of 24.2 ± 7.3 (n = 52) out of 100 in the NASA task load index. CONCLUSIONS: MR is a promising tool for instructing practical skills, and has the potential to enable superior learning outcomes. Advances in MR technology are necessary to improve the usability of current systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register ID: DRKS00013186 BioMed Central 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7745503/ /pubmed/33327963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02450-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schoeb, D. S. Schwarz, J. Hein, S. Schlager, D. Pohlmann, P. F. Frankenschmidt, A. Gratzke, C. Miernik, A. Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
title | Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
title_full | Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
title_fullStr | Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
title_short | Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
title_sort | mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02450-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoebds mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT schwarzj mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT heins mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT schlagerd mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT pohlmannpf mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT frankenschmidta mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT gratzkec mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial AT miernika mixedrealityforteachingcatheterplacementtomedicalstudentsarandomizedsingleblindedprospectivetrial |