Cargando…

Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study

High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meroni, Alice, Muirhead, Roslyn P., Atkinson, Fiona S., Fogelholm, Mikael, Raben, Anne, Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33365325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.603801
_version_ 1783625456307666944
author Meroni, Alice
Muirhead, Roslyn P.
Atkinson, Fiona S.
Fogelholm, Mikael
Raben, Anne
Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
author_facet Meroni, Alice
Muirhead, Roslyn P.
Atkinson, Fiona S.
Fogelholm, Mikael
Raben, Anne
Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
author_sort Meroni, Alice
collection PubMed
description High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate protein-moderate GI diet (MPMG). This post hoc analysis included 161 participants with overweight and pre-diabetes from the Australian cohort of the PREVIEW study (clinical trial registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1) who were randomly assigned to a HPLG diet (25% energy from protein, dietary GI ≤ 50, n = 85) or a MPMG diet (15% energy from protein, dietary GI ≥ 56, n = 76). Food records were collected at 0-mo (baseline) and at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo (dietary intervention period). Linear mixed models were used to compare the differences in total energy, macro- and micronutrients, dietary GI, glycemic load (GL) and body weight between the two diet groups at the 4 dietary intervention time points. At 3 y, 74% participants from the HPLG diet and 74% participants from the MPMG diet completed the trial. The HPLG group showed significantly higher protein intake and lower dietary GI and GL than the MPMG group (group fixed effect P < 0.001 for all three parameters). By 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo there was a 3.0, 2.7, 2.2, and 1.4% point difference in protein intake and 6.2, 4.1, 4.8, and 3.9 GI unit difference between the groups. The intake of energy and saturated fat decreased (mostly in the first 6-mo), while the intake of dietary fiber increased (from mo-0 to mo-12 only) in both diets, with no significant differences between the diets. The dietary intakes of zinc (group fixed effect P = 0.05), selenium (P = 0.01), niacin (P = 0.01), vitamin B12 (P = 0.01) and dietary cholesterol (group by time fixed effect P = 0.001) were higher in the HPLG group than in the MPMG group. Despite both diets being designed to be nutritionally complete, a HPLG diet was found to be more nutritious in relation to some micronutrients, but not cholesterol, than a MPMG diet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7750310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77503102020-12-22 Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study Meroni, Alice Muirhead, Roslyn P. Atkinson, Fiona S. Fogelholm, Mikael Raben, Anne Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Front Nutr Nutrition High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate protein-moderate GI diet (MPMG). This post hoc analysis included 161 participants with overweight and pre-diabetes from the Australian cohort of the PREVIEW study (clinical trial registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1) who were randomly assigned to a HPLG diet (25% energy from protein, dietary GI ≤ 50, n = 85) or a MPMG diet (15% energy from protein, dietary GI ≥ 56, n = 76). Food records were collected at 0-mo (baseline) and at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo (dietary intervention period). Linear mixed models were used to compare the differences in total energy, macro- and micronutrients, dietary GI, glycemic load (GL) and body weight between the two diet groups at the 4 dietary intervention time points. At 3 y, 74% participants from the HPLG diet and 74% participants from the MPMG diet completed the trial. The HPLG group showed significantly higher protein intake and lower dietary GI and GL than the MPMG group (group fixed effect P < 0.001 for all three parameters). By 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo there was a 3.0, 2.7, 2.2, and 1.4% point difference in protein intake and 6.2, 4.1, 4.8, and 3.9 GI unit difference between the groups. The intake of energy and saturated fat decreased (mostly in the first 6-mo), while the intake of dietary fiber increased (from mo-0 to mo-12 only) in both diets, with no significant differences between the diets. The dietary intakes of zinc (group fixed effect P = 0.05), selenium (P = 0.01), niacin (P = 0.01), vitamin B12 (P = 0.01) and dietary cholesterol (group by time fixed effect P = 0.001) were higher in the HPLG group than in the MPMG group. Despite both diets being designed to be nutritionally complete, a HPLG diet was found to be more nutritious in relation to some micronutrients, but not cholesterol, than a MPMG diet. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7750310/ /pubmed/33365325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.603801 Text en Copyright © 2020 Meroni, Muirhead, Atkinson, Fogelholm, Raben and Brand-Miller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Meroni, Alice
Muirhead, Roslyn P.
Atkinson, Fiona S.
Fogelholm, Mikael
Raben, Anne
Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study
title Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study
title_full Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study
title_fullStr Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study
title_full_unstemmed Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study
title_short Is a Higher Protein-Lower Glycemic Index Diet More Nutritious Than a Conventional Diet? A PREVIEW Sub-study
title_sort is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? a preview sub-study
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33365325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.603801
work_keys_str_mv AT meronialice isahigherproteinlowerglycemicindexdietmorenutritiousthanaconventionaldietapreviewsubstudy
AT muirheadroslynp isahigherproteinlowerglycemicindexdietmorenutritiousthanaconventionaldietapreviewsubstudy
AT atkinsonfionas isahigherproteinlowerglycemicindexdietmorenutritiousthanaconventionaldietapreviewsubstudy
AT fogelholmmikael isahigherproteinlowerglycemicindexdietmorenutritiousthanaconventionaldietapreviewsubstudy
AT rabenanne isahigherproteinlowerglycemicindexdietmorenutritiousthanaconventionaldietapreviewsubstudy
AT brandmillerjenniec isahigherproteinlowerglycemicindexdietmorenutritiousthanaconventionaldietapreviewsubstudy