Cargando…

Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition

We designed experiments to assess whether fungal cell wall mannans function as an immune shield or an immune agonist. Fungal cell wall β-(1,3)-glucan normally plays a major and dominant role in immune activation. The outer mannan layer has been variously described as an immune shield, because it has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Bhawna, Mora-Montes, Héctor M., Wagener, Jeanette, Cunningham, Iain, West, Lara, Haynes, Ken, Brown, Alistair J.P., Gow, Neil A.R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042
_version_ 1783625536721911808
author Yadav, Bhawna
Mora-Montes, Héctor M.
Wagener, Jeanette
Cunningham, Iain
West, Lara
Haynes, Ken
Brown, Alistair J.P.
Gow, Neil A.R.
author_facet Yadav, Bhawna
Mora-Montes, Héctor M.
Wagener, Jeanette
Cunningham, Iain
West, Lara
Haynes, Ken
Brown, Alistair J.P.
Gow, Neil A.R.
author_sort Yadav, Bhawna
collection PubMed
description We designed experiments to assess whether fungal cell wall mannans function as an immune shield or an immune agonist. Fungal cell wall β-(1,3)-glucan normally plays a major and dominant role in immune activation. The outer mannan layer has been variously described as an immune shield, because it has the potential to mask the underlying β-(1,3)-glucan, or an immune activator, as it also has the potential to engage with a wide range of mannose detecting PRRs. To resolve this conundrum we examined species-specific differences in host immune recognition in the och1Δ N-mannosylation-deficient mutant background in four species of yeast-like fungi. Irrespective of the fungal species, the cytokine response (TNFα and IL-6) induced by the och1Δ mutants in human monocytes was reduced compared to that of the wild type. In contrast, TNFα production induced by och1Δ was increased, relative to wild type, due to increased β-glucan exposure, when mouse or human macrophages were used. These observations suggest that N-mannan is not a major PAMP for macrophages and that in these cells mannan does shield the fungus from recognition of the inner cell wall β-glucan. However, N-mannan is a significant inducer of cytokine for monocytes. Therefore the metaphor of the fungal “mannan shield” can only be applied to some, but not all, myeloid cells used in immune profiling experiments of fungal species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7750734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77507342020-12-23 Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition Yadav, Bhawna Mora-Montes, Héctor M. Wagener, Jeanette Cunningham, Iain West, Lara Haynes, Ken Brown, Alistair J.P. Gow, Neil A.R. Cell Surf Article We designed experiments to assess whether fungal cell wall mannans function as an immune shield or an immune agonist. Fungal cell wall β-(1,3)-glucan normally plays a major and dominant role in immune activation. The outer mannan layer has been variously described as an immune shield, because it has the potential to mask the underlying β-(1,3)-glucan, or an immune activator, as it also has the potential to engage with a wide range of mannose detecting PRRs. To resolve this conundrum we examined species-specific differences in host immune recognition in the och1Δ N-mannosylation-deficient mutant background in four species of yeast-like fungi. Irrespective of the fungal species, the cytokine response (TNFα and IL-6) induced by the och1Δ mutants in human monocytes was reduced compared to that of the wild type. In contrast, TNFα production induced by och1Δ was increased, relative to wild type, due to increased β-glucan exposure, when mouse or human macrophages were used. These observations suggest that N-mannan is not a major PAMP for macrophages and that in these cells mannan does shield the fungus from recognition of the inner cell wall β-glucan. However, N-mannan is a significant inducer of cytokine for monocytes. Therefore the metaphor of the fungal “mannan shield” can only be applied to some, but not all, myeloid cells used in immune profiling experiments of fungal species. Elsevier 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7750734/ /pubmed/33364531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yadav, Bhawna
Mora-Montes, Héctor M.
Wagener, Jeanette
Cunningham, Iain
West, Lara
Haynes, Ken
Brown, Alistair J.P.
Gow, Neil A.R.
Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
title Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
title_full Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
title_fullStr Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
title_full_unstemmed Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
title_short Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
title_sort differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: n-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavbhawna differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT moramonteshectorm differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT wagenerjeanette differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT cunninghamiain differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT westlara differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT haynesken differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT brownalistairjp differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition
AT gowneilar differencesinfungalimmunerecognitionbymonocytesandmacrophagesnmannancanbeashieldoractivatorofimmunerecognition