Cargando…

Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity

Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouthelier, Antonio, Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda, Urrutia, Andrés A., Aragonés, Julián
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249401
_version_ 1783628238231175168
author Bouthelier, Antonio
Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda
Urrutia, Andrés A.
Aragonés, Julián
author_facet Bouthelier, Antonio
Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda
Urrutia, Andrés A.
Aragonés, Julián
author_sort Bouthelier, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7764359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77643592020-12-27 Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity Bouthelier, Antonio Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda Urrutia, Andrés A. Aragonés, Julián Int J Mol Sci Article Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed. MDPI 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7764359/ /pubmed/33321829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249401 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bouthelier, Antonio
Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda
Urrutia, Andrés A.
Aragonés, Julián
Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
title Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
title_full Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
title_fullStr Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
title_full_unstemmed Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
title_short Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
title_sort differential contribution of n- and c-terminal regions of hif1α and hif2α to their target gene selectivity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249401
work_keys_str_mv AT bouthelierantonio differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity
AT melendezrodriguezflorinda differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity
AT urrutiaandresa differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity
AT aragonesjulian differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity