Cargando…
Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity
Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent ge...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249401 |
_version_ | 1783628238231175168 |
---|---|
author | Bouthelier, Antonio Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda Urrutia, Andrés A. Aragonés, Julián |
author_facet | Bouthelier, Antonio Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda Urrutia, Andrés A. Aragonés, Julián |
author_sort | Bouthelier, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7764359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77643592020-12-27 Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity Bouthelier, Antonio Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda Urrutia, Andrés A. Aragonés, Julián Int J Mol Sci Article Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed. MDPI 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7764359/ /pubmed/33321829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249401 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bouthelier, Antonio Meléndez-Rodríguez, Florinda Urrutia, Andrés A. Aragonés, Julián Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity |
title | Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity |
title_full | Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity |
title_fullStr | Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity |
title_short | Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity |
title_sort | differential contribution of n- and c-terminal regions of hif1α and hif2α to their target gene selectivity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bouthelierantonio differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity AT melendezrodriguezflorinda differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity AT urrutiaandresa differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity AT aragonesjulian differentialcontributionofnandcterminalregionsofhif1aandhif2atotheirtargetgeneselectivity |