Cargando…
Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Experiential learning sessions as a teaching aid have been applied early in the medical undergraduate curriculum to improve the knowledge and inculcate research interest. We compared the ability of 1(st)-year medical undergraduates to answer the molecular biology questions among those wh...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33426110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_462_20 |
_version_ | 1783630306225422336 |
---|---|
author | Prashant, Akila Devegowda, Devananda Vishwanath, Prashant Nataraj, Suma M. |
author_facet | Prashant, Akila Devegowda, Devananda Vishwanath, Prashant Nataraj, Suma M. |
author_sort | Prashant, Akila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Experiential learning sessions as a teaching aid have been applied early in the medical undergraduate curriculum to improve the knowledge and inculcate research interest. We compared the ability of 1(st)-year medical undergraduates to answer the molecular biology questions among those who had attended the experiential learning sessions of molecular biology techniques versus those who did not attend. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was carried out with 200 1(st)-year medical undergraduates, among whom 69 students were selected by simple random sampling for the demonstration of the molecular biology techniques, such as isolation of genomic DNA, polymerase chain reaction, cell culture techniques, western blotting, and high-performance liquid chromatography for 1-week duration. Student's feedback was collected on a five-point Likert sc ale at the end of the session to understand how they agree or disagree with a particular statement. The content validity rate (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) of the questionnaire were determined, and its internal consistency was examined by Cronbach's alpha. The internal assessment marks of these students, valued by faculty who were blinded to their training sessions, were compared with the rest of the 131 students by independent t-test to know the outcome of these experiential learning sessions. RESULTS: On CVR and CVI assessment, all the questions scored more than 0.70 and 0.85, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for the whole questionnaire was 0.85. Student's feedback indicated that these sessions did complement the cognitive skills acquired for these techniques. We also found a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.006) in the examination performance between the students who attended versus those who did not attend the experiential learning sessions. CONCLUSION: Experiential learning, through demonstration and hands-on experience, enhance d the learning of molecular biology techniques among 1(st)-year medical undergraduates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7774624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77746242021-01-07 Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial Prashant, Akila Devegowda, Devananda Vishwanath, Prashant Nataraj, Suma M. J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: Experiential learning sessions as a teaching aid have been applied early in the medical undergraduate curriculum to improve the knowledge and inculcate research interest. We compared the ability of 1(st)-year medical undergraduates to answer the molecular biology questions among those who had attended the experiential learning sessions of molecular biology techniques versus those who did not attend. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was carried out with 200 1(st)-year medical undergraduates, among whom 69 students were selected by simple random sampling for the demonstration of the molecular biology techniques, such as isolation of genomic DNA, polymerase chain reaction, cell culture techniques, western blotting, and high-performance liquid chromatography for 1-week duration. Student's feedback was collected on a five-point Likert sc ale at the end of the session to understand how they agree or disagree with a particular statement. The content validity rate (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) of the questionnaire were determined, and its internal consistency was examined by Cronbach's alpha. The internal assessment marks of these students, valued by faculty who were blinded to their training sessions, were compared with the rest of the 131 students by independent t-test to know the outcome of these experiential learning sessions. RESULTS: On CVR and CVI assessment, all the questions scored more than 0.70 and 0.85, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for the whole questionnaire was 0.85. Student's feedback indicated that these sessions did complement the cognitive skills acquired for these techniques. We also found a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.006) in the examination performance between the students who attended versus those who did not attend the experiential learning sessions. CONCLUSION: Experiential learning, through demonstration and hands-on experience, enhance d the learning of molecular biology techniques among 1(st)-year medical undergraduates. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7774624/ /pubmed/33426110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_462_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Education and Health Promotion http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Prashant, Akila Devegowda, Devananda Vishwanath, Prashant Nataraj, Suma M. Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | impact of experiential learning among medical undergraduates: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33426110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_462_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prashantakila impactofexperientiallearningamongmedicalundergraduatesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT devegowdadevananda impactofexperientiallearningamongmedicalundergraduatesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vishwanathprashant impactofexperientiallearningamongmedicalundergraduatesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT natarajsumam impactofexperientiallearningamongmedicalundergraduatesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |