Cargando…

1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service

BACKGROUND: Timely, efficient, and effective feedback strategies are crucial for enhancing faculty-trainee communication and trainee education. Here we describe attitudes, practices, and perceived behaviors regarding giving feedback to medical trainees rotating on Infectious Diseases (ID) inpatient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Eva, Kulkarni, Prathit, Mohajer, Mayar Al, Rose, Stacey, Serpa, Jose, Singhal, Geeta, Giordano, Thomas Giordano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776358/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1315
_version_ 1783630663926153216
author Clark, Eva
Kulkarni, Prathit
Mohajer, Mayar Al
Rose, Stacey
Serpa, Jose
Singhal, Geeta
Giordano, Thomas Giordano
author_facet Clark, Eva
Kulkarni, Prathit
Mohajer, Mayar Al
Rose, Stacey
Serpa, Jose
Singhal, Geeta
Giordano, Thomas Giordano
author_sort Clark, Eva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Timely, efficient, and effective feedback strategies are crucial for enhancing faculty-trainee communication and trainee education. Here we describe attitudes, practices, and perceived behaviors regarding giving feedback to medical trainees rotating on Infectious Diseases (ID) inpatient consult services. METHODS: An anonymous survey on feedback strategies was distributed to our adult ID Section in February 2020 as part of a facilitated discussion on optimizing trainee clinical education. RESULTS: Twenty-six ID Section members completed the survey (18 faculty, 8 trainees). Most trainees (62.5%) and faculty (66.7%) felt that trainees are “sometimes” comfortable voicing concerns to faculty; however, no trainees but 11.1% of faculty indicated that trainees are “always” comfortable voicing concerns to faculty. Most trainees (87.5%) felt that conversations about team expectations occur “sometimes” or “often.” In contrast, most faculty (72.2%) felt that these conversations “always” occur. Although most faculty felt that both informal (94.4%) and formal (83.3%) feedback should be given to trainees, 22.2% of faculty responded that they do not explicitly use the term “feedback” when discussing feedback with a trainee. No trainees and 22.2% of faculty indicated that they utilize a feedback tool. Regarding quantity of feedback trainees perceive they receive from faculty, 37.5% of trainees felt they needed more feedback while 50% felt they received adequate feedback. Most faculty (88.9%) responded that they encourage trainees to give feedback to faculty, although most trainees (62.5%) responded “sometimes” regarding how comfortable they feel doing so. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found differences between faculty and trainees regarding two important aspects of medical education: setting expectations and providing feedback. While most faculty feel that conversations regarding these topics occur invariably, trainees do not always share this perception. Trainees felt less comfortable voicing concerns and giving feedback to faculty than faculty perceived them to be. Overall, the data suggest that there is room for improvement to ensure that trainees and faculty are operating from a shared mental model regarding setting team expectations and providing/receiving feedback. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77763582021-01-07 1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service Clark, Eva Kulkarni, Prathit Mohajer, Mayar Al Rose, Stacey Serpa, Jose Singhal, Geeta Giordano, Thomas Giordano Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Timely, efficient, and effective feedback strategies are crucial for enhancing faculty-trainee communication and trainee education. Here we describe attitudes, practices, and perceived behaviors regarding giving feedback to medical trainees rotating on Infectious Diseases (ID) inpatient consult services. METHODS: An anonymous survey on feedback strategies was distributed to our adult ID Section in February 2020 as part of a facilitated discussion on optimizing trainee clinical education. RESULTS: Twenty-six ID Section members completed the survey (18 faculty, 8 trainees). Most trainees (62.5%) and faculty (66.7%) felt that trainees are “sometimes” comfortable voicing concerns to faculty; however, no trainees but 11.1% of faculty indicated that trainees are “always” comfortable voicing concerns to faculty. Most trainees (87.5%) felt that conversations about team expectations occur “sometimes” or “often.” In contrast, most faculty (72.2%) felt that these conversations “always” occur. Although most faculty felt that both informal (94.4%) and formal (83.3%) feedback should be given to trainees, 22.2% of faculty responded that they do not explicitly use the term “feedback” when discussing feedback with a trainee. No trainees and 22.2% of faculty indicated that they utilize a feedback tool. Regarding quantity of feedback trainees perceive they receive from faculty, 37.5% of trainees felt they needed more feedback while 50% felt they received adequate feedback. Most faculty (88.9%) responded that they encourage trainees to give feedback to faculty, although most trainees (62.5%) responded “sometimes” regarding how comfortable they feel doing so. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found differences between faculty and trainees regarding two important aspects of medical education: setting expectations and providing feedback. While most faculty feel that conversations regarding these topics occur invariably, trainees do not always share this perception. Trainees felt less comfortable voicing concerns and giving feedback to faculty than faculty perceived them to be. Overall, the data suggest that there is room for improvement to ensure that trainees and faculty are operating from a shared mental model regarding setting team expectations and providing/receiving feedback. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776358/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1315 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Clark, Eva
Kulkarni, Prathit
Mohajer, Mayar Al
Rose, Stacey
Serpa, Jose
Singhal, Geeta
Giordano, Thomas Giordano
1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service
title 1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service
title_full 1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service
title_fullStr 1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service
title_full_unstemmed 1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service
title_short 1129. Optimizing Feedback Strategies on the Infectious Diseases Inpatient Service
title_sort 1129. optimizing feedback strategies on the infectious diseases inpatient service
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776358/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1315
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkeva 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice
AT kulkarniprathit 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice
AT mohajermayaral 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice
AT rosestacey 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice
AT serpajose 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice
AT singhalgeeta 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice
AT giordanothomasgiordano 1129optimizingfeedbackstrategiesontheinfectiousdiseasesinpatientservice