Cargando…
qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies
Gene and cell therapy fields have experienced remarkable growth during the past decade. Demands for preclinical and clinical safety assessments of these cell and gene therapy test articles (TAs) have effectively increased the necessity for regulated biodistribution, vector shedding, gene expression,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33473355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.11.007 |
_version_ | 1783632550920454144 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Haiyan Bell, Kristin N. Loker, Rossi N. |
author_facet | Ma, Haiyan Bell, Kristin N. Loker, Rossi N. |
author_sort | Ma, Haiyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gene and cell therapy fields have experienced remarkable growth during the past decade. Demands for preclinical and clinical safety assessments of these cell and gene therapy test articles (TAs) have effectively increased the necessity for regulated biodistribution, vector shedding, gene expression, and/or pharmacokinetics bioanalysis studies. Guidance documents issued from numerous international regulatory authorities recommend the use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and/or quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) assays due to their highly sensitive and robust target-specific detection. However, only preclinical biodistribution assay sensitivity is specified in these documents. Criteria such as accuracy, precision, and repeatability are not yet defined. This guidance void has resulted in several conflicting institutional interpretations of essential parameters necessary for the development and validation of robust assays to support safety assessments of gene and cell therapy TAs. There is an urgent need for an ongoing discussion among bioanalytical scientists in this field to generate a “best practice” consensus around preclinical and clinical qPCR/qRT-PCR assay design. With regard to this need, we offer critical points to consider when developing, validating, running sample analysis, and reporting qPCR/qRT-PCR assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7786041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77860412021-01-19 qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies Ma, Haiyan Bell, Kristin N. Loker, Rossi N. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Review Gene and cell therapy fields have experienced remarkable growth during the past decade. Demands for preclinical and clinical safety assessments of these cell and gene therapy test articles (TAs) have effectively increased the necessity for regulated biodistribution, vector shedding, gene expression, and/or pharmacokinetics bioanalysis studies. Guidance documents issued from numerous international regulatory authorities recommend the use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and/or quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) assays due to their highly sensitive and robust target-specific detection. However, only preclinical biodistribution assay sensitivity is specified in these documents. Criteria such as accuracy, precision, and repeatability are not yet defined. This guidance void has resulted in several conflicting institutional interpretations of essential parameters necessary for the development and validation of robust assays to support safety assessments of gene and cell therapy TAs. There is an urgent need for an ongoing discussion among bioanalytical scientists in this field to generate a “best practice” consensus around preclinical and clinical qPCR/qRT-PCR assay design. With regard to this need, we offer critical points to consider when developing, validating, running sample analysis, and reporting qPCR/qRT-PCR assays. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7786041/ /pubmed/33473355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.11.007 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ma, Haiyan Bell, Kristin N. Loker, Rossi N. qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
title | qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
title_full | qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
title_fullStr | qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
title_full_unstemmed | qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
title_short | qPCR and qRT-PCR analysis: Regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
title_sort | qpcr and qrt-pcr analysis: regulatory points to consider when conducting biodistribution and vector shedding studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33473355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.11.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahaiyan qpcrandqrtpcranalysisregulatorypointstoconsiderwhenconductingbiodistributionandvectorsheddingstudies AT bellkristinn qpcrandqrtpcranalysisregulatorypointstoconsiderwhenconductingbiodistributionandvectorsheddingstudies AT lokerrossin qpcrandqrtpcranalysisregulatorypointstoconsiderwhenconductingbiodistributionandvectorsheddingstudies |