Cargando…

Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey

It is well-established in the literature that biases (e. g., related to body size, ethnicity, race etc.) can occur during the employment interview and that applicants' fairness perceptions related to selection procedures can influence attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward the recruiting o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nørskov, Sladjana, Damholdt, Malene F., Ulhøi, John P., Jensen, Morten B., Ess, Charles, Seibt, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.586263
_version_ 1783636407605002240
author Nørskov, Sladjana
Damholdt, Malene F.
Ulhøi, John P.
Jensen, Morten B.
Ess, Charles
Seibt, Johanna
author_facet Nørskov, Sladjana
Damholdt, Malene F.
Ulhøi, John P.
Jensen, Morten B.
Ess, Charles
Seibt, Johanna
author_sort Nørskov, Sladjana
collection PubMed
description It is well-established in the literature that biases (e. g., related to body size, ethnicity, race etc.) can occur during the employment interview and that applicants' fairness perceptions related to selection procedures can influence attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward the recruiting organization. This study explores how social robotics may affect this situation. Using an online, video vignette-based experimental survey (n = 235), the study examines applicant fairness perceptions of two types of job interviews: a face-to-face and a robot-mediated interview. To reduce the risk of socially desirable responses, desensitize the topic, and detect any inconsistencies in the respondents' reactions to vignette scenarios, the study employs a first-person and a third-person perspective. In the robot-mediated interview, two teleoperated robots are used as fair proxies for the applicant and the interviewer, thus providing symmetrical visual anonymity unlike prior research that relied on asymmetrical anonymity, in which only one party was anonymized. This design is intended to eliminate visual cues that typically cause implicit biases and discrimination of applicants, but also to prevent biasing the interviewer's assessment through impression management tactics typically used by applicants. We hypothesize that fairness perception (i.e., procedural fairness and interactional fairness) and behavioral intentions (i.e., intentions of job acceptance, reapplication intentions, and recommendation intentions) will be higher in a robot-mediated job interview than in a face-to-face job interview, and that this effect will be stronger for introvert applicants. The study shows, contrary to our expectations, that the face-to-face interview is perceived as fairer, and that the applicant's personality (introvert vs. extravert) does not affect this perception. We discuss this finding and its implications, and address avenues for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78058992021-01-25 Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey Nørskov, Sladjana Damholdt, Malene F. Ulhøi, John P. Jensen, Morten B. Ess, Charles Seibt, Johanna Front Robot AI Robotics and AI It is well-established in the literature that biases (e. g., related to body size, ethnicity, race etc.) can occur during the employment interview and that applicants' fairness perceptions related to selection procedures can influence attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward the recruiting organization. This study explores how social robotics may affect this situation. Using an online, video vignette-based experimental survey (n = 235), the study examines applicant fairness perceptions of two types of job interviews: a face-to-face and a robot-mediated interview. To reduce the risk of socially desirable responses, desensitize the topic, and detect any inconsistencies in the respondents' reactions to vignette scenarios, the study employs a first-person and a third-person perspective. In the robot-mediated interview, two teleoperated robots are used as fair proxies for the applicant and the interviewer, thus providing symmetrical visual anonymity unlike prior research that relied on asymmetrical anonymity, in which only one party was anonymized. This design is intended to eliminate visual cues that typically cause implicit biases and discrimination of applicants, but also to prevent biasing the interviewer's assessment through impression management tactics typically used by applicants. We hypothesize that fairness perception (i.e., procedural fairness and interactional fairness) and behavioral intentions (i.e., intentions of job acceptance, reapplication intentions, and recommendation intentions) will be higher in a robot-mediated job interview than in a face-to-face job interview, and that this effect will be stronger for introvert applicants. The study shows, contrary to our expectations, that the face-to-face interview is perceived as fairer, and that the applicant's personality (introvert vs. extravert) does not affect this perception. We discuss this finding and its implications, and address avenues for future research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7805899/ /pubmed/33501344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.586263 Text en Copyright © 2020 Nørskov, Damholdt, Ulhøi, Jensen, Ess and Seibt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Robotics and AI
Nørskov, Sladjana
Damholdt, Malene F.
Ulhøi, John P.
Jensen, Morten B.
Ess, Charles
Seibt, Johanna
Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey
title Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey
title_full Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey
title_fullStr Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey
title_full_unstemmed Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey
title_short Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey
title_sort applicant fairness perceptions of a robot-mediated job interview: a video vignette-based experimental survey
topic Robotics and AI
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.586263
work_keys_str_mv AT nørskovsladjana applicantfairnessperceptionsofarobotmediatedjobinterviewavideovignettebasedexperimentalsurvey
AT damholdtmalenef applicantfairnessperceptionsofarobotmediatedjobinterviewavideovignettebasedexperimentalsurvey
AT ulhøijohnp applicantfairnessperceptionsofarobotmediatedjobinterviewavideovignettebasedexperimentalsurvey
AT jensenmortenb applicantfairnessperceptionsofarobotmediatedjobinterviewavideovignettebasedexperimentalsurvey
AT esscharles applicantfairnessperceptionsofarobotmediatedjobinterviewavideovignettebasedexperimentalsurvey
AT seibtjohanna applicantfairnessperceptionsofarobotmediatedjobinterviewavideovignettebasedexperimentalsurvey