Cargando…
A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy
The production of optimized strains of a specific phenotype requires the construction and testing of a large number of genome modifications and combinations thereof. Most bacterial iterative genome-editing methods include essential steps to eliminate selection markers, or to cure plasmids. Additiona...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1141 |
_version_ | 1783640498546671616 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jichao Sui, Xinyue Ding, Yamei Fu, Yingxin Feng, Xinjun Liu, Min Zhang, Youming Xian, Mo Zhao, Guang |
author_facet | Wang, Jichao Sui, Xinyue Ding, Yamei Fu, Yingxin Feng, Xinjun Liu, Min Zhang, Youming Xian, Mo Zhao, Guang |
author_sort | Wang, Jichao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The production of optimized strains of a specific phenotype requires the construction and testing of a large number of genome modifications and combinations thereof. Most bacterial iterative genome-editing methods include essential steps to eliminate selection markers, or to cure plasmids. Additionally, the presence of escapers leads to time-consuming separate single clone picking and subsequent cultivation steps. Herein, we report a genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) strategy. Each of three constructed sgRNA plasmids can cure, or be cured by, the other two plasmids in the system; plasmids from a previous round of editing can be cured while the current round of editing takes place. Due to the enhanced curing efficiency and embedded double check mechanism, separate steps for plasmid curing or confirmation are not necessary, and only two times of cultivation are needed per genome-editing round. This method was successfully demonstrated in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with both gene deletions and replacements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fastest and most robust iterative genome-editing method, with the least times of cultivation decreasing the possibilities of spontaneous genome mutations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7826264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78262642021-01-27 A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy Wang, Jichao Sui, Xinyue Ding, Yamei Fu, Yingxin Feng, Xinjun Liu, Min Zhang, Youming Xian, Mo Zhao, Guang Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online The production of optimized strains of a specific phenotype requires the construction and testing of a large number of genome modifications and combinations thereof. Most bacterial iterative genome-editing methods include essential steps to eliminate selection markers, or to cure plasmids. Additionally, the presence of escapers leads to time-consuming separate single clone picking and subsequent cultivation steps. Herein, we report a genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) strategy. Each of three constructed sgRNA plasmids can cure, or be cured by, the other two plasmids in the system; plasmids from a previous round of editing can be cured while the current round of editing takes place. Due to the enhanced curing efficiency and embedded double check mechanism, separate steps for plasmid curing or confirmation are not necessary, and only two times of cultivation are needed per genome-editing round. This method was successfully demonstrated in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with both gene deletions and replacements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fastest and most robust iterative genome-editing method, with the least times of cultivation decreasing the possibilities of spontaneous genome mutations. Oxford University Press 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7826264/ /pubmed/33270888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1141 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Wang, Jichao Sui, Xinyue Ding, Yamei Fu, Yingxin Feng, Xinjun Liu, Min Zhang, Youming Xian, Mo Zhao, Guang A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy |
title | A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy |
title_full | A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy |
title_fullStr | A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy |
title_short | A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy |
title_sort | fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a rock-paper-scissors strategy |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjichao afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT suixinyue afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT dingyamei afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT fuyingxin afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT fengxinjun afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT liumin afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT zhangyouming afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT xianmo afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT zhaoguang afastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT wangjichao fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT suixinyue fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT dingyamei fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT fuyingxin fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT fengxinjun fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT liumin fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT zhangyouming fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT xianmo fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy AT zhaoguang fastandrobustiterativegenomeeditingmethodbasedonarockpaperscissorsstrategy |