Cargando…

16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys

Sequencing 16S rRNA gene amplicons is the gold standard to uncover the composition of prokaryotic communities. The presence of multiple copies of this gene makes the community abundance data distorted and gene copy normalization (GCN) necessary for correction. Even though GCN of 16S data provided a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starke, Robert, Pylro, Victor Satler, Morais, Daniel Kumazawa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01586-7
_version_ 1783642494556176384
author Starke, Robert
Pylro, Victor Satler
Morais, Daniel Kumazawa
author_facet Starke, Robert
Pylro, Victor Satler
Morais, Daniel Kumazawa
author_sort Starke, Robert
collection PubMed
description Sequencing 16S rRNA gene amplicons is the gold standard to uncover the composition of prokaryotic communities. The presence of multiple copies of this gene makes the community abundance data distorted and gene copy normalization (GCN) necessary for correction. Even though GCN of 16S data provided a picture closer to the metagenome before, it should also be compared with communities of known composition due to the fact that library preparation is prone to methodological biases. Here, we process 16S rRNA gene amplicon data from eleven simple mock communities with DADA2 and estimate the impact of GCN. In all cases, the mock community composition derived from the 16S sequencing differs from those expected, and GCN fails to improve the classification for most of the analysed communities. Our approach provides empirical evidence that GCN does not improve the 16S target sequencing analyses in real scenarios. We therefore question the use of GCN for metataxonomic surveys until a more comprehensive catalogue of copy numbers becomes available. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00248-020-01586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78353102021-02-01 16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys Starke, Robert Pylro, Victor Satler Morais, Daniel Kumazawa Microb Ecol Note Sequencing 16S rRNA gene amplicons is the gold standard to uncover the composition of prokaryotic communities. The presence of multiple copies of this gene makes the community abundance data distorted and gene copy normalization (GCN) necessary for correction. Even though GCN of 16S data provided a picture closer to the metagenome before, it should also be compared with communities of known composition due to the fact that library preparation is prone to methodological biases. Here, we process 16S rRNA gene amplicon data from eleven simple mock communities with DADA2 and estimate the impact of GCN. In all cases, the mock community composition derived from the 16S sequencing differs from those expected, and GCN fails to improve the classification for most of the analysed communities. Our approach provides empirical evidence that GCN does not improve the 16S target sequencing analyses in real scenarios. We therefore question the use of GCN for metataxonomic surveys until a more comprehensive catalogue of copy numbers becomes available. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00248-020-01586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-08-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7835310/ /pubmed/32862246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01586-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Note
Starke, Robert
Pylro, Victor Satler
Morais, Daniel Kumazawa
16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys
title 16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys
title_full 16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys
title_fullStr 16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys
title_full_unstemmed 16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys
title_short 16S rRNA Gene Copy Number Normalization Does Not Provide More Reliable Conclusions in Metataxonomic Surveys
title_sort 16s rrna gene copy number normalization does not provide more reliable conclusions in metataxonomic surveys
topic Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01586-7
work_keys_str_mv AT starkerobert 16srrnagenecopynumbernormalizationdoesnotprovidemorereliableconclusionsinmetataxonomicsurveys
AT pylrovictorsatler 16srrnagenecopynumbernormalizationdoesnotprovidemorereliableconclusionsinmetataxonomicsurveys
AT moraisdanielkumazawa 16srrnagenecopynumbernormalizationdoesnotprovidemorereliableconclusionsinmetataxonomicsurveys