Cargando…

Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice

Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4, the LPS receptor, plays a central role in the control of leptospirosis and absence of TLR4 results in lethal infection in mice. Because human TLR4 does not sense the atypical leptospiral-LPS, we hypothesized that TLR4/MD-2 humanized transgenic mice (huTLR4) may be more su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nair, Nisha, Guedes, Mariana S., Hajjar, Adeline M., Werts, Catherine, Gomes-Solecki, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572999
_version_ 1783644164435476480
author Nair, Nisha
Guedes, Mariana S.
Hajjar, Adeline M.
Werts, Catherine
Gomes-Solecki, Maria
author_facet Nair, Nisha
Guedes, Mariana S.
Hajjar, Adeline M.
Werts, Catherine
Gomes-Solecki, Maria
author_sort Nair, Nisha
collection PubMed
description Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4, the LPS receptor, plays a central role in the control of leptospirosis and absence of TLR4 results in lethal infection in mice. Because human TLR4 does not sense the atypical leptospiral-LPS, we hypothesized that TLR4/MD-2 humanized transgenic mice (huTLR4) may be more susceptible to leptospirosis than wild-type mice, and thus may constitute a model of acute human leptospirosis. We infected huTLR4 mice, which express human TLR4 but not murine TLR4, with a high dose of L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni FioCruz (Leptospira) in comparison to C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and, as a control, a congenic strain in which the tlr4 coding sequences are deleted (muTLR4(Lps-del)). We show that the huTLR4 gene is fully functional in the murine background. We found that dissemination of Leptospira in blood, shedding in urine, colonization of the kidney and overall kinetics of leptospirosis progression is equivalent between WT and huTLR4 C57BL/6J mice. Furthermore, inflammation of the kidney appeared to be subdued in huTLR4 compared to WT mice in that we observed less infiltrates of mononuclear lymphocytes, less innate immune markers and no relevant differences in fibrosis markers. Thus, huTLR4 mice showed less inflammation and kidney pathology, and are not more susceptible to leptospirosis than WT mice. This study is significant as it indicates that one intact TLR4 gene, be it mouse or human, is necessary to control acute leptospirosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7843520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78435202021-01-30 Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice Nair, Nisha Guedes, Mariana S. Hajjar, Adeline M. Werts, Catherine Gomes-Solecki, Maria Front Immunol Immunology Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4, the LPS receptor, plays a central role in the control of leptospirosis and absence of TLR4 results in lethal infection in mice. Because human TLR4 does not sense the atypical leptospiral-LPS, we hypothesized that TLR4/MD-2 humanized transgenic mice (huTLR4) may be more susceptible to leptospirosis than wild-type mice, and thus may constitute a model of acute human leptospirosis. We infected huTLR4 mice, which express human TLR4 but not murine TLR4, with a high dose of L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni FioCruz (Leptospira) in comparison to C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and, as a control, a congenic strain in which the tlr4 coding sequences are deleted (muTLR4(Lps-del)). We show that the huTLR4 gene is fully functional in the murine background. We found that dissemination of Leptospira in blood, shedding in urine, colonization of the kidney and overall kinetics of leptospirosis progression is equivalent between WT and huTLR4 C57BL/6J mice. Furthermore, inflammation of the kidney appeared to be subdued in huTLR4 compared to WT mice in that we observed less infiltrates of mononuclear lymphocytes, less innate immune markers and no relevant differences in fibrosis markers. Thus, huTLR4 mice showed less inflammation and kidney pathology, and are not more susceptible to leptospirosis than WT mice. This study is significant as it indicates that one intact TLR4 gene, be it mouse or human, is necessary to control acute leptospirosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7843520/ /pubmed/33519799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572999 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nair, Guedes, Hajjar, Werts and Gomes-Solecki http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Nair, Nisha
Guedes, Mariana S.
Hajjar, Adeline M.
Werts, Catherine
Gomes-Solecki, Maria
Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice
title Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice
title_full Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice
title_fullStr Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice
title_full_unstemmed Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice
title_short Role of TLR4 in Persistent Leptospira interrogans Infection: A Comparative In Vivo Study in Mice
title_sort role of tlr4 in persistent leptospira interrogans infection: a comparative in vivo study in mice
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572999
work_keys_str_mv AT nairnisha roleoftlr4inpersistentleptospirainterrogansinfectionacomparativeinvivostudyinmice
AT guedesmarianas roleoftlr4inpersistentleptospirainterrogansinfectionacomparativeinvivostudyinmice
AT hajjaradelinem roleoftlr4inpersistentleptospirainterrogansinfectionacomparativeinvivostudyinmice
AT wertscatherine roleoftlr4inpersistentleptospirainterrogansinfectionacomparativeinvivostudyinmice
AT gomessoleckimaria roleoftlr4inpersistentleptospirainterrogansinfectionacomparativeinvivostudyinmice